Skip to main content
Download PDF

SIgA in various pulmonary diseases

European Journal of Medical Research volume 28, Article number: 299 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) is one of the most abundant immunoglobulin subtypes among mucosa, which plays an indispensable role in the first-line protection against invading pathogens and antigens. Therefore, the role of respiratory SIgA in respiratory mucosal immune diseases has attracted more and more attention. Although the role of SIgA in intestinal mucosal immunity has been widely studied, the cell types responsible for SIgA and the interactions between cells are still unclear. Here, we conducted a wide search of relevant studies and sorted out the relationship between SIgA and some pulmonary diseases (COPD, asthma, tuberculosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, COVID-19, lung cancer), which found SIgA is involved in the pathogenesis and progression of various lung diseases, intending to provide new ideas for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of related lung diseases.

Introduction

SIgA is a kind of immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody, which is mainly distributed in milk, tears, saliva, airway, gastrointestinal secretions, and other mucosal secretions, playing an important role in mucosal immune response, tumor formation, anti-allergy, and other aspects. For the respiratory system, with every breath, we inhale thousands of particles into the airway, posing many potential threats to the integrity of the lungs. The airway mucosal immune system serves as a powerful protective mechanism, providing innate and adaptive responses to these inhaled particles, inflammatory responses to harmful antigens, and tolerance mechanisms to harmless antigens. The failure of these responses may lead to increased antigen infiltration and repeated infections, or excessive immune response to harmless antigens, all of which may lead to chronic airway disease and a series of related lung diseases [1]. In this review, we summarized relevant information on SIgA mucosal immune system and investigated how its dysfunction affects the pathogenesis and clinical course of a series of lung diseases.

Overview of SIgA

Synthesis of SIgA

Typical SIgA molecules are composed of IgA, J chains, and secretory components (SC). IgA and J chains are synthesized from plasma cells, which are located in the lamina propria of the respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, urogenital tract, and other mucous membranes. After synthesis, one J chain connects two monomer IgA to form dimer IgA (dIgA). After the formation of dIgA, it is secreted from plasma cells and forms a dIgA–pIgR complex with the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR) expressed by epithelial cells [2]. Subsequently, under the action of proteolytic enzymes, the extracellular segment of pIgR, namely, SC, combines with dIgA and finally forms SIgA [3, 4].

Function of SIgA

SIgA is the main antibody involved in local immunity. As the main responding factor of the mucosal immune system, it plays an indispensable role in resisting the invasion of external pathogenic microorganisms. It not only neutralizes bacterial toxins but also participates in the formation of the immune barrier and immune clearance. It can affect the progress of autoimmune diseases by mediating immune response [5].

Factors affecting the level of SIgA

Studies have shown that SIgA level may be related to the level of steroid hormones. In particular, there is a remarkable positive correlation between the sex hormones, such as testosterone and estrogen and SIgA [6]. The level of SIgA is also regulated by different types of immune cells. T lymphocytes participate in the production of IgA. B lymphocytes, micro pleated epithelial cells (M cells), and the molecules expressed by M cells (activating inducible cytidine deaminase and TGF‐β) are also essential for the production of IgA [7, 8]. In addition, various cytokines and the external environment can also regulate the level of SIgA. Studies have shown that there is a relationship between SIgA production and cytokine production [9], TNF-β can up-regulate the expression of fpIgR and the production of SC, which is modulated by PI3K and NF-κB signal pathway [10]. IL-10, IL-4, retinoic acid, and IgA-induced proteins were also identified as stimulators of IgA production [11]. In addition, it has been found in recent years that cold exposure may inhibit the production of B lymphocyte activating factor, leading to the inhibition of IgA secretion in bronchial epithelium, thus increasing the frequency of acute viral respiratory infection in cold weather. Therefore, it is suggested that temperature can affect mucosal immune function by regulating the production of SIgA [12].

The relationship between SIgA and pulmonary diseases

Pulmonary bronchial epithelium is a pseudostratified epithelium composed of many cell types, and its proportion is strictly controlled [13, 14]. Bronchial airway epithelium is mostly composed of ciliary and goblet cells. In addition, it also includes basal cells, globular cells, neuroendocrine cells, and rare ionic cells [15]. Ciliary and goblet cells work together to remove foreign particles and other irritant stimuli of the air spaces by Mucociliary transport or clearance. Among them, Goblet cells account for 5–15% of the airway epithelial cells of healthy people and their main function is to produce mucus. Goblet cells, are mostly absent in small airways. Ciliary cells are the most prominent of all epithelial cells, accounting for over 50% of airway epithelial cells. The synchronous swinging of their cilia produces the mucus layer to the trachea and throat [16]; Basal cells are pluripotent stem cells, whose proportion in respiratory bronchioles is relatively less compared to trachea [17], They not only strengthen the epithelium and the underlying lamina propria, but also help promote the steady and regular regeneration of epithelium after injury [18, 19]; Globular cells are involved in host defense, accounting for 20% of small airway epithelial cells [20, 21]; Neuroendocrine cells are rare [22], which are considered to be related to oxygen induction, smooth muscle tension and immune response [23, 24]; The rare ionic cells seem to control the viscosity of fluid and mucus on the airway surface [25]. Among them ciliary cells, goblet cells, globular cells and ionic cells have been shown to express pIgR, take part in the process of d-IgA formation and promote SIgA secretion to the apical mucus layer [26,27,28] (Fig. 1). Along the airway epithelium, SIgA helps to provide first-line mucosal protection against inhaled particles and pathogens. The dIgA produced by mucosal Plasma cell is transported to the apex of airway epithelial cells through pIgR, where it is released as SIgA. SIgA mediated immune response is involved in a series of lung diseases [1]. In Table 1, we summarized the association between SIgA mediated mucosal immune changes and SIgA dysfunction with the most common lung diseases (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Production of SIgA in lung epithelial mucosa and its role in resisting the invasion of external pathogenic microorganisms. (1) Plasma cells in the lamina propria secrete dIgA. (2) DIgA binds to pIgR produced by pulmonary bronchial epithelial cells and stimulates endocytosis to form dIgA pIgR complex. (3) Under the action of proteolytic enzyme, the extracellular segment of pIgR, namely, SC, combines with dIgA to form SIgA, which is released into the top mucus layer. (4) SIgA drives immune rejection, agglutinates, intercepts and eliminates pathogenic microorganisms. Acknowledgements: the figure is drawn by Figdraw

Full size image
Table 1 Overview of SIgA levels in pulmonary diseases and the significance of impaired SIgA response
Full size table

SIgA and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic and complex respiratory disease characterized by persistent airflow limitation and respiratory symptoms [52]. Modern medical research finds that decrease or lack of SIgA secretion in respiratory epithelium plays a role in the pathogenesis of COPD, due to a dysfunction of local immune response [29, 30, 53]. The destruction of the SIgA immune barrier will cause a pathological crosstalk cycle between the immune system and its adaptive branches, making COPD patients unable to normally drive the activation of adaptive immunity [54]. The loss of the SIgA immune barrier in small airways of patients with severe COPD is a complex process, which may be caused by pIgR-dependent defects in IgA transfection and SIgA degradation [27]. The lack of pIgR/SIgA in the airway will result in the continuous activation of the innate immune response, leading to progressive small airway remodeling and emphysema [55]. Gohy et al. linked the down-regulation of pIgR with bronchial epithelial reprogramming driven by TGF-β [31]. The inflammatory environment of COPD patients’ lungs is initiated by chronic infiltration of neutrophils. Inflammation leads to downregulation of pIgR through TGF, causing impaired IgA transport and subsequently a decrease in SIgA levels on the mucosa, and eventually contributing to the impaired lung IgA immune function in COPD patients [1, 56]. Polosukhin et al. found that the expression of pIgR in the bronchial epithelium was reduced, and the IgA secreted in bronchoalveolar lavage was also reduced in the bronchial mucosa area covered by the pseudostratified epithelium of COPD patients [53]. This may be connected with the reduced expression of pIgR gene in ciliated cells in the airway [57]. In COPD, the down-regulation of pIgR is clearer in the remodeling area of bronchial epithelium [53]. Richmond et al. found that pIgR-deficient mice lacking SIgA would spontaneously develop into mice with COPD-like changes in their bronchial epithelium with age [55].

In addition, the reduction of SIgA or pIgR levels is also related to the severity of COPD. A study found, the level of pIgR in the bronchial epithelium of severe COPD patients was lower than that in the control group, and the pIgR and IgA transport in the bronchial epithelial cell of severe COPD patients was reduced [31], This may be related to the chronic accumulation of CD8+ T lymphocytes in the small airways. Compared with the IgA positive airways, the intraepithelial and submucosal CD8+ T lymphocyte infiltration in the airways with IgA deficiency increases [53]. To our knowledge, there is no direct study on whether regional bronchial IgA scarcity is related to the rate and intensity of COPD exacerbations. However, an observational SPIROMICS cohort study showed that COPD patients with significantly reduced IgA levels of serum experienced more frequent and severe deterioration [29]. Since the lack of SIgA on the small airway surface is related to the progress of COPD, it can be considered a potential new therapeutic target for COPD.

SIgA and asthma

Asthma is a chronic bronchitis disease characterized by chronic airway inflammation, airway remodeling, airway hyperresponsiveness, and elevated serum allergen-specific IgE concentrations. As an important factor involved in inflammation and regulating immunity, SIgA goes together with the occurrence and development of asthma. It may be used as an index to evaluate the susceptibility, severity, and treatment effect of asthma.

Some scholars found that the level of serum IgA was positively correlated with the results of asthma control test, and the IgA level of asthma patients has significant negative correlation with the prevalence of moderate–severe asthma. With the increase of serum IgA level, the severity of asthma could be better controlled and improved [58]. SIgA levels can be induced by different stimuli, such as cytokine IL-4 [59], or TGF produced by dendritic cells-β [60]. In asthma, pIgR expression is downregulated due to the release of IL-4 and IL-13 by Th2-cells [32]. The decrease in mucosal SIgA leads to a decrease in immune rejection of allergens, while the immune system’s allergic response is enhanced; In addition, the immune regulatory effect of SIgA on dendritic cells and subsequent inflammatory suppression are impaired [1, 33]. In a study done by Shkalim et al. among children in Israel, it was found that that asthma was the most common allergic disease in patients with selective immunoglobulin A deficiency (SIgAD), based on evaluation of their clinical and immunological characteristics [61]. This may be related to the fact that patients with SIgAD cannot neutralize or prevent the absorption of allergens so they are prone to allergic diseases, such as asthma and food allergy [34]. Urm et al. conducted a case–control study and found that asthma patients are more susceptible to SIgAD than non-asthma patients, and SIgAD increases the risk of bacterial infections and recurring infections among patients with asthma. It was also found that an elevated white blood cell count is associated with low levels of serum IgA in asthma patients with recurring infections [34, 61,62,63,64]. However, some studies have concluded that SIgAD, as an immunodeficiency disease, may be related to increased serum IgE levels [61]. Shahin et al. have also reached a similar conclusion. They have revealed serum IgA level is correlated with serum IgE level, and the correlation is significantly negative [65]. Several studies have confirmed that serum IgE levels of asthmatic patients are elevated [66, 67]. This further shows that the progression of asthma is closely related to SIgA.

In spite of all its protective effects on infectious, allergic and autoimmune disease, some studies have shown that SIgA has some negative effects on human biology. For instance, because of its function as esonophil and basophil activator, SIgA can perpetuate allergic reactions and exacerbations of asthma, although this is supposed to have a protective effect on parasitic infestations [68, 69]. Further research is needed to understand the correlation of SIgA levels to severity of asthma. Overall, can be a potential target for treatment of asthma in future.

SIgA and tuberculosis

Pulmonary tuberculosis is a potentially fatal infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A growing number of studies have shown a protective effect of SIgA on various viral and bacterial infections, such as tuberculosis [70]. SIgA protects the mucosal epithelial barrier through different mechanisms [39]. On one hand, it can prevent bacteria from entering the lung by preventing bacterial antigens from adhering to the mucosal surface through the SC [37, 39, 71]. On the other hand, it can accelerate the clearance of immune complexes through respiratory ciliary movement [72], and stimulate antigen-presenting cells to activate T cells [38], thus activating protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection [73]. However, When the body's immune system declines, the strong mucosal immunity cannot trigger a decrease in SIgA production, making the body more susceptible to infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis [36].

In mice, infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, SIgA has shown to induce formation of great organized granuloma, which is a sign of effective immune activation and disease control. SIgA has also shown to greatly reduce bacterial load of lung and as a consequence the damage to lung is minimized [70, 74]. Respiratory immunization with a DNA vaccine prepared with chitosan can protect tuberculosis by enhancing the production of SIgA in lung bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) [75, 76]. NP, a potential new nanoparticle adjuvant of the tuberculosis subunit vaccine, can also increase SIgA and other immune proteins in lung lavage fluid to induce strong cellular and humoral immune responses [77]. Mice with reduced IgA and pIgR levels were more susceptible to BCG infection [78]. Rodriguez et al. showed that IgA-deficient mice immunized with Mycobacterium cell surface antigen were more susceptible to intranasal BCG infection than wild-type mice [78]. Further research is needed to understand if the stimulation of respiratory SIgA would modulate the pathogenic effects of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This remains an important yet unexplored area.

SIgA and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common disease in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. It has a poor prognosis and is a fatal respiratory disease [79], characterized by excessive deposition of fibrous tissue in the alveolar septal area [41, 80].

Some studies have shown that SIgA may promote the proliferation of human lung fibroblasts by promoting inflammation by induction of various cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 [81], thereby further promoting the proliferation of human pulmonary fibroblasts and collagen contraction [40]. The excessive proliferation of lung fibroblasts will in turn results in excess production of extracellular matrix and thereby promoting human lung fibrosis [40, 82]. In addition, Mota P et al. proposed that the bronchiolar epithelium secretes IgA into the airway cavity through pIgR, forming mucus rich in SIgA, which accumulates in the IPF lung [41, 42]. It is worth noting that the accumulation of this mucus is related to the decrease of FVC. Some studies have shown that SIgA can bind to the surface of A549 cells. A549 is usually used as a cell line with AT2 cell phenotype in vitro experiments, which can promote the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and transforming growth factor (TGF)‐β [83]. Notably, these cytokines are involved in the pathogenesis of IPF [84,85,86]. In addition, research suggests that TGF‐β is the strongest cytokine for fibrosis formation in IPF [87], and is crucial for the production of SIgA. In addition, it can induce conversion of B lymphocytes to IgA production. Therefore, an environment rich in TGF‐β may increase the number of IgA lymphocytes and the concentration of IgA. In the lungs of IPF patients, a tertiary lymphatic structure can be observed, which is the formation of ectopic lymphocytes composed of a large number of IgA B lymphocytes. This circulating feedback leads to an increase in sIgA levels in the lungs of IPF patients [43]. However, the origin of fibroblasts accumulated in IPF remains elusive. Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a possible mechanism [88]. In EMT, airway epithelial cells and alveolar epithelial cells located near the bronchiole lumen acquire mesenchymal characteristics and become fibroblasts [89], and these cells react to SIgA in airway mucus after coming in contact with it, thus intensifying the formation of fibrosis [90]. Some research shows that this may be related to TGF-β/Smad pathway [91]. Therefore, this pathway can be used as a target for treating the pulmonary interstitial fibrosis. In the bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis mouse model, dasatinib, an inhibitor of the TGF-β/Smad pathway, can inhibit the EMT of mouse alveolar and bronchial epithelial cells, thereby slowing down the progress of pulmonary fibrosis by reducing the reaction with SIgA [91]. In addition, Ten Klooster L et al. found, that serum IgA level can be treated as a prognostic biomarker of IPF, and high serum IgA level indicates a worse prognosis [92]. The above studies fully show that SIgA is significantly related to the progress and prognosis of IPF patients.

In addition, studies have shown that SIgA can promote the occurrence and development of IPF due to its ability to bind to transferrin receptor (TfR) CD71, thereby blocking the binding of SIgA and CD71 [40]. This also provides a new target for the treatment of IPF. However, other studies show that CD71 does not seem to be the only receptor involved. Because as a key receptor for human life, CD71 is necessary for both cell iron introduction and cell maintenance. Therefore, it seems that it is not feasible to eliminate the effect of SIgA on some fibrogenic diseases by targeting CD71, and its feasibility needs to be further studied [93]. Recently, it has been found that ANXA2, which is expressed in airway epithelial cells, is a new receptor for SIgA. Immunohistochemistry of lung sections shows that ANXA2 is clearly expressed in airway epithelial cells [94]. Further research is needed to explore the interaction between ANXA2 or other possible receptors and SIgA in IPF, which can provide new ideas for our treatment of IPF.

SIgA and COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has carried a large threat to public health. The main transmission route of SARS-CoV-2 is inhaling respiratory droplets which contain virus particles [95], inducing the body to produce SIgA antibodies in saliva, nasal juice, and nasal cavity, thereby activating mucosal immune response and limiting the virus to the upper respiratory tract, resulting in asymptomatic infection or only mild symptoms [49]. SIgA plays a part in antiviral protective immunity. The determination of IgA in saliva and serum as a marker deserves further study in SARS-CoV-2 infection [96].

It has been found that SIgA in the saliva of severe COVID-19 patients is also reactive to non-novel coronavirus, and this heterologous immune response consists of a non-protective cross-reaction [97]. Similarly, another study showed that cross reactive SARS-CoV-2 SIgA also existed in the saliva of people non-infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, indicating that SIgA may be helpful in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection [98]. An investigation found that the positive rate of SARS-CoV-2 reactive saliva IgA antibody in Japanese people not infected with novel coronavirus was unexpectedly high, which may be an important reason for the low prevalence of COVID-19 in Japan [99].

There is evidence that the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection increases with age, the positive rate of reactive saliva IgA antibody in minors is higher than that in adults, which helps reduce their susceptibility to the virus [99]. In contrast, the susceptibility of the elderly is much higher [100, 101], which may be related to the decrease of SARS-CoV-2 reactive saliva IgA antibody with age [102], or the lack of mannose-binding lectin [103]. These studies indicate that individuals with a lack of saliva IgA antibodies, or individuals with negative reactions between saliva IgA antibodies and SARS-CoV-2, have a high risk of virus infection [104], which may also be the reason for the ineffectiveness of severe COVID-19 vaccine [105].

There are other routes of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. For example, the gastrointestinal tract may also be an important entrance or interaction site, and the role of the intestinal mucosal immune system as the first line of physical and immune defense is crucial [106]. In terms of vertical transmission, injecting the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine during pregnancy and lactation can induce an anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA reaction in milk [107]. The SARS-CoV-2-infected mother is in good health and can start or continue breastfeeding [95]. Some studies even advocate that breastfeeding can be maintained during infection, because the SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody and free secretory component (fSC) secreted in breast milk can provide passive immunity for infants [108], and protect them from COVID-19 disease and gastrointestinal-related diseases [109, 110].

The most effective measure to control the COVID-19 pandemic is to vaccinate against SARS-CoV-2. The systemic and mucosal IgA responses caused by mRNA vaccination are different, so the effect of preventing subsequent infection is also different. The new SARS-CoV-2 is constantly changing, and the development of the COVID-19 vaccine that causes high levels of IgA may reduce human-to-human transmission [111]. In individuals not previously exposed to SARS-CoV-2, vaccination can induce minimal mucosal SIgA reaction, while in patients with a history of COVID-19, SIgA induction after vaccination is more effective [112]. The widespread use of vaccine preparations is likely to be very useful in determining the individual immune status of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 or vaccinated [113]. Similar studies have found that vaccine adjuvants can also affect the mucosal immunity of the respiratory tract to COVID-19 by affecting the level of SIgA. Cao et al. believe that the recombinant virus encoding the trimeric SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain can produce a high level of serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus IgA and alveolar lavage fluid RBD-specific SIgA, causing a strong systemic immune response and mucosal neutralizing antibodies, which is expected to be used as a new SARS-CoV-2 vaccine [114]. Zheng et al. found that the inhalable nanovaccine with a bionic coronavirus structure can bind to the coronavirus by secreting high titer SIgA, thus triggering the mucosal immunity of respiratory tract to COVID-19 [115]. In addition, it has been suggested that SIgA in BALF of mice inoculated with live attenuated vaccine d16 developed with SARS-CoV-2 lacking nsp16 can effectively activate mucosal immunity against SARS-CoV-2 [116]. As a potential protective factor, Vitamin A have an effect on SARS-CoV-2 infection because of the fact that retinoic acid, the active metabolite of vitamin A, can mediate the production of SIgA in the respiratory tract, thus exerting the immune regulation function [117]. In addition, The supplement of neutrophil elastase inhibitor can promote the development of mucosal immunity including SIgA [118, 119], by stimulation of B cell activating factor, proliferation inducing ligand and IL-10 of TNF family [120], it can help to produce SIgA to prevent infection of pathogens at one or more mucosal sites, which is of great significance for the development of future vaccines.

In addition to the beneficial effects of mucosal IgA response in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, the harmful effects of IgA in COVID-19 have also been observed. Especially in the later stages of COVID-19, when the virus neutralizing activity of SIgA is lost, the result may be fatal [47, 121]. For example, Staats et al. described the correlation between anti SARS-CoV-2 IgA antibody in the serum of severe COVID-19 patients and the formation of Neutrophil extracellular traps (NET). They found that subclass IgA antibodies, in particular, are effective activators of neutrophil inflammation and NET formation [122]. In COVID-19, as reported by several research groups, the enhanced formation of NET is associated with fatal outcomes [47, 123,124,125]. Therefore, LaSalle et al. hypothesized that in the early stages, IgA induced NET release is beneficial for preventing SARS-CoV-2 entry into the mucosal region, while NET release may be harmful to circulation and promote tissue damage in the later stage [48]. This provides a breakthrough for the development and application of COVID-19 therapy based on IgA.

SIgA and lung cancer

In many human malignancies, such as lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, and hematopoietic cell cancers, studies have confirmed that the expression level of SIgA in patients with disease, is different from that in healthy people [126, 127]. Therefore, it has been further proposed by early relevant studies that the secreted IgA antibody is specific for tumor cell clearance, and the relevant immune response can be used for the early detection of cancer [128]. The IgA antibody isolated or screened from tissues can directly act on tumor cells in vitro or in vivo, so it may be used for tumor treatment [129]. IgA deficiency was significantly associated with cancer risk and cancer mortality [50, 51]. It has been found that, compared with patients without neoplastic bronchopulmonary disease, 30% of patients with lung cancer, especially those with squamous cell carcinoma, have increased levels of SIgA synthesis in normal bronchial tissues. The determination of SIgA in bronchial mucosa can be regarded as a valuable early diagnostic aid for suspected lung tumors [130, 131]. The decreased concentration of SIgA in the airway of lung cancer patients may have adverse effects on airway resistance to bacterial colonization [132].

However, the relationship between SIgA and lung cancer is complex and subject to confusion and reverse causation. On one hand, low SIgA levels were significantly associated with cancer risk and cancer mortality [50, 51], possibly because of reduced immune surveillance of mucosal sites and glands discharging into the mucosa. On the other hand, a high level of SIgA is considered to be an indicator of an existing underlying disease. At some point, immune cells in lung cancer patients interact with tumor cells to cause an immune response that promotes SIgA production. Moreover, since the occurrence of lung cancer is closely linked to environmental factors [50], other lung diseases caused by environmental factors may also detect an increase in SIgA. Therefore, the measurement of SIgA is unlikely to be clinically significant in the diagnosis of lung malignancy. Atis et al. found that the SIgA level of bronchial lavage fluid in chronic bronchitis, bronchiectasis, and lung cancer groups was no significant difference between the groups. They believed that SIgA was not useful in distinguishing the respiratory epithelial injury or inflammatory reaction of patients with different pulmonary diseases [133]. At present, SIgA has not been used as a potential breakthrough in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. However, perhaps, there will be discoveries in the future, which need further research.

Conclusion

To sum up, SIgA is involved in the pathogenesis and progression of various lung diseases and has complex and effective immune functions. With the advancement of this field, SIgA can serve as a potential target for the treatment of lung diseases. However, there have been few previous studies using SIgA as a therapeutic antibody, and there is a lack of evidence at both preclinical and clinical levels on whether SIgA-related antibodies can provide clinical benefits for patients with airway diseases. Preliminary studies have shown that intervention on the level of SIgA in lung diseases can delay the progress of the disease to a certain extent. SIgA can be used as a promising biomarker. Through further exploration of its functions, receptor complexes, induced effects and mechanisms, related drugs, and their interaction, we believe that the mechanisms of SIgA in lung diseases will be gradually clarified, which can provide new ideas and targets for the prevention, treatment and diagnosis of various lung diseases. In addition, with the further development of recombinant antibody production, complex and polymeric SIgA molecules may be produced on a large scale and with high quality, thus making the widespread application of therapeutic SIgA formulations possible.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable: the data sets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the PubMed.

Abbreviations

SIgA:

Secretory immunoglobulin A

IgA:

Immunoglobulin A

dIgA:

Dimer IgA

SC:

Secretory component

fSC:

Free secretory component

pIgR:

Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor

M cells:

Micro pleated epithelial cells

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

SIgAD:

Selective immunoglobulin A deficiency

BALF:

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

IPF:

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

IL:

Interleukin

MCP:

Monocyte chemoattractant protein

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

TGF:

Transforming growth factor

EMT:

Epithelial mesenchymal transition

TfR:

Transferrin receptor

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

References

  1. de Fays C, Carlier FM, Gohy S, Pilette C. Secretory immunoglobulin A immunity in chronic obstructive respiratory diseases. Cells. 2022;11(8):1324.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Li Y, Jin L, Chen T. The effects of secretory iga in the mucosal immune system. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:2032057.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaetzel CS, Mestecky J, Johansen FE. Two cells, one antibody: the discovery of the cellular origins and transport of secretory IgA. J Immunol. 2017;198(5):1765–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johansen FE, Kaetzel CS. Regulation of the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor and IgA transport: new advances in environmental factors that stimulate pIgR expression and its role in mucosal immunity. Mucosal Immunol. 2011;4(6):598–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rees F, Doherty M, Grainge MJ, Lanyon P, Zhang W. The worldwide incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56(11):1945–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hodges-Simeon CR, Prall SP, Blackwell AD, Gurven M, Gaulin SJC. Adrenal maturation, nutritional status, and mucosal immunity in Bolivian youth. Am J Hum Biol. 2017;29(5):e23025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Suzuki K, Nakajima A. New aspects of IgA synthesis in the gut. Int Immunol. 2014;26(9):489–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Suzuki K, Fagarasan S. Diverse regulatory pathways for IgA synthesis in the gut. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;2(6):468–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salerno-Goncalves R, Safavie F, Fasano A, Sztein MB. Free and complexed-secretory immunoglobulin A triggers distinct intestinal epithelial cell responses. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;185(3):338–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheng X, Guo Y, Tang Q, Tang X, Xing J, Chi H, et al. Upregulation of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor expression in flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) gill cells by cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α via activating PI3K and NF-κB signaling pathways. Mol Immunol. 2021;135:170–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Spencer J, Sollid LM. The human intestinal B-cell response. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9(5):1113–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshino Y, Yamamoto A, Misu K, Wakabayashi Y, Kitazawa T, Ota Y. Exposure to low temperatures suppresses the production of B-cell activating factor via TLR3 in BEAS-2B cells. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2020;24: 100809.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis JD, Wypych TP. Cellular and functional heterogeneity of the airway epithelium. Mucosal Immunol. 2021;14(5):978–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gohy S, Hupin C, Ladjemi MZ, Hox V, Pilette C. Key role of the epithelium in chronic upper airways diseases. Clin Exp Allergy. 2020;50(2):135–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Travaglini KJ, Nabhan AN, Penland L, Sinha R, Gillich A, Sit RV, et al. A molecular cell atlas of the human lung from single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature. 2020;587(7835):619–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Knight DA, Holgate ST. The airway epithelium: structural and functional properties in health and disease. Respirology. 2003;8(4):432–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boers JE, Ambergen AW, Thunnissen FB. Number and proliferation of basal and parabasal cells in normal human airway epithelium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(6 Pt 1):2000–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rock JR, Randell SH, Hogan BL. Airway basal stem cells: a perspective on their roles in epithelial homeostasis and remodeling. Dis Model Mech. 2010;3(9–10):545–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hogan BL, Barkauskas CE, Chapman HA, Epstein JA, Jain R, Hsia CC, et al. Repair and regeneration of the respiratory system: complexity, plasticity, and mechanisms of lung stem cell function. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(2):123–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zuo WL, Shenoy SA, Li S, O’Beirne SL, Strulovici-Barel Y, Leopold PL, et al. Ontogeny and biology of human small airway epithelial club cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(11):1375–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hiemstra PS, Bourdin A. Club cells, CC10 and self-control at the epithelial surface. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(4):831–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boers JE, den Brok JL, Koudstaal J, Arends JW, Thunnissen FB. Number and proliferation of neuroendocrine cells in normal human airway epithelium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154(3 Pt 1):758–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Linnoila RI. Functional facets of the pulmonary neuroendocrine system. Lab Invest. 2006;86(5):425–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Branchfield K, Nantie L, Verheyden JM, Sui P, Wienhold MD, Sun X. Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells function as airway sensors to control lung immune response. Science. 2016;351(6274):707–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Montoro DT, Haber AL, Biton M, Vinarsky V, Lin B, Birket SE, et al. A revised airway epithelial hierarchy includes CFTR-expressing ionocytes. Nature. 2018;560(7718):319–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. He WH, Zhang WD, Cheng CC, Lu J, Liu L, Chen ZH, et al. Expression characteristics of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor in Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) lungs. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3): e0264815.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Blackburn JB, Schaff JA, Gutor S, Du RH, Nichols D, Sherrill T, et al. Secretory cells are the primary source of pIgR in small airways. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2022;67(3):334–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Schiller HB, Montoro DT, Simon LM, Rawlins EL, Meyer KB, Strunz M, et al. The human lung cell atlas: a high-resolution reference map of the human lung in health and disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2019;61(1):31–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Putcha N, Paul GG, Azar A, Wise RA, O’Neal WK, Dransfield MT, et al. Lower serum IgA is associated with COPD exacerbation risk in SPIROMICS. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(4): e0194924.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Polosukhin VV, Richmond BW, Du RH, Cates JM, Wu P, Nian H, et al. Secretory IgA deficiency in individual small airways is associated with persistent inflammation and remodeling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(8):1010–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gohy ST, Detry BR, Lecocq M, Bouzin C, Weynand BA, Amatngalim GD, et al. Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor down-regulation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Persistence in the cultured epithelium and role of transforming growth factor-β. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(5):509–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ladjemi MZ, Gras D, Dupasquier S, Detry B, Lecocq M, Garulli C, et al. Bronchial epithelial IgA secretion is impaired in asthma. Role of IL-4/IL-13. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(11):1396–409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Diana J, Moura IC, Vaugier C, Gestin A, Tissandie E, Beaudoin L, et al. Secretory IgA induces tolerogenic dendritic cells through SIGNR1 dampening autoimmunity in mice. J Immunol. 2013;191(5):2335–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Abo Ali FH, Mahmoud NE, El-Sayed AYM, Abdelmaksoud MF, Shata AK, Fouad SH. Selective IgA deficiency a probable risk of recurrent chest infections in asthmatics. J Asthma Allergy. 2021;14:1323–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim WJ, Choi IS, Kim CS, Lee JH, Kang HW. Relationship between serum IgA level and allergy/asthma. Korean J Intern Med. 2017;32(1):137–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Xiao JN, Xiong Y, Chen Y, Xiao YJ, Ji P, Li Y, et al. Determination of lipoprotein Z-specific IgA in tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:495.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tjärnlund A, Rodríguez A, Cardona PJ, Guirado E, Ivanyi J, Singh M, et al. Polymeric IgR knockout mice are more susceptible to mycobacterial infections in the respiratory tract than wild-type mice. Int Immunol. 2006;18(5):807–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Arulanandam BP, Raeder RH, Nedrud JG, Bucher DJ, Le J, Metzger DW. IgA immunodeficiency leads to inadequate Th cell priming and increased susceptibility to influenza virus infection. J Immunol. 2001;166(1):226–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaetzel CS, Robinson JK, Chintalacharuvu KR, Vaerman JP, Lamm ME. The polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (secretory component) mediates transport of immune complexes across epithelial cells: a local defense function for IgA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(19):8796–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Arakawa S, Suzukawa M, Watanabe K, Kobayashi K, Matsui H, Nagai H, et al. Secretory immunoglobulin A induces human lung fibroblasts to produce inflammatory cytokines and undergo activation. Clin Exp Immunol. 2019;195(3):287–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mota P, Soares M, Vasconcelos C, Ferreira A, Lima B, Manduchi E, et al. Predictive value of common genetic variants in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis survival. J Mol Med (Berl). 2022;100(9):1341–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang Q, Wang Y, Qu D, Yu J, Yang J. MUC5B the possible pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis considering. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:9712464.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Heukels P, van Hulst JAC, van Nimwegen M, Boorsma CE, Melgert BN, von der Thusen JH, et al. Enhanced Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in B-cells and autoreactive IgA in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):232.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Padoan A, Sciacovelli L, Basso D, Negrini D, Zuin S, Cosma C, et al. IgA-Ab response to spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19: a longitudinal study. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;507:164–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sterlin D, Mathian A, Miyara M, Mohr A, Anna F, Claër L, et al. IgA dominates the early neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(577):eabd2223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chan RWY, Chan KCC, Lui GCY, Tsun JGS, Chan KYY, Yip JSK, et al. Mucosal antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in paediatric and adult patients: a longitudinal study. Pathogens. 2022;11(4):397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. LaSalle TJ, Gonye ALK, Freeman SS, Kaplonek P, Gushterova I, Kays KR, et al. Longitudinal characterization of circulating neutrophils uncovers phenotypes associated with severity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Cell Rep Med. 2022;3(10): 100779.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Okba NMA, Müller MA, Li W, Wang C, GeurtsvanKessel CH, Corman VM, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibody responses in coronavirus disease patients. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(7):1478–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Russell MW, Mestecky J. Mucosal immunity: the missing link in comprehending SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission. Front Immunol. 2022;13:957107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Phillips AC, Carroll D, Drayson MT, Der G. Salivary immunoglobulin A secretion rate is negatively associated with cancer mortality: the west of scotland twenty-07 study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0145083.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Cunningham-Rundles C. The many faces of common variable immunodeficiency. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012;2012:301–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Shen YC, Chen L, Wen FQ. Inter[retation of 2019 global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018;98(48):3913–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Polosukhin VV, Cates JM, Lawson WE, Zaynagetdinov R, Milstone AP, Massion PP, et al. Bronchial secretory immunoglobulin a deficiency correlates with airway inflammation and progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(3):317–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Richmond BW, Mansouri S, Serezani A, Novitskiy S, Blackburn JB, Du RH, et al. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells link localized secretory IgA deficiency to adaptive immune activation in COPD. Mucosal Immunol. 2021;14(2):431–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Richmond BW, Brucker RM, Han W, Du RH, Zhang Y, Cheng DS, et al. Airway bacteria drive a progressive COPD-like phenotype in mice with polymeric immunoglobulin receptor deficiency. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Bohländer F. A new hope? Possibilities of therapeutic IgA antibodies in the treatment of inflammatory lung diseases. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1127339.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Zuo WL, Rostami MR, Shenoy SA, LeBlanc MG, Salit J, Strulovici-Barel Y, et al. Cell-specific expression of lung disease risk-related genes in the human small airway epithelium. Respir Res. 2020;21(1):200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Balzar S, Strand M, Nakano T, Wenzel SE. Subtle immunodeficiency in severe asthma: IgA and IgG2 correlate with lung function and symptoms. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2006;140(2):96–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Stavnezer J, Guikema JE, Schrader CE. Mechanism and regulation of class switch recombination. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:261–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Ruane D, Chorny A, Lee H, Faith J, Pandey G, Shan M, et al. Microbiota regulate the ability of lung dendritic cells to induce IgA class-switch recombination and generate protective gastrointestinal immune responses. J Exp Med. 2016;213(1):53–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Shkalim V, Monselize Y, Segal N, Zan-Bar I, Hoffer V, Garty BZ. Selective IgA deficiency in children in Israel. J Clin Immunol. 2010;30(5):761–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Urm SH, Yun HD, Fenta YA, Yoo KH, Abraham RS, Hagan J, et al. Asthma and risk of selective IgA deficiency or common variable immunodeficiency: a population-based case-control study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(8):813–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang W, Yao T, Zhang T, Quan M, Wang C, Wang C, et al. Selective immunoglobulin A deficiency (SIgAD) primarily leads to recurrent infections and autoimmune diseases: a retrospective study of Chinese patients in the past 40 years. Genes Dis. 2020;7(1):115–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Dieguez-Alvarez M, Carballo I, Alonso-Sampedro M, Sopeña B, Gude F, Gonzalez-Quintela A. Serum immunoglobulin-A (IgA) concentrations in a general adult population: association with demographics and prevalence of selective IgA deficiency. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58(4):e109–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Shahin RY, Ali FHA, Melek NAN, Elateef IAA, Attia MY. Study of selective immunoglobulin A deficiency among Egyptian patients with food allergy. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2020;45(2):184–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Mallah N, Rodriguez-Segade S, Gonzalez-Barcala FJ, Takkouche B. Blood eosinophil count as predictor of asthma exacerbation. A meta-analysis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2021;32(3):465–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Eger KA, Bel EH. The emergence of new biologics for severe asthma. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2019;46:108–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Abu-Ghazaleh RI, Fujisawa T, Mestecky J, Kyle RA, Gleich GJ. IgA-induced eosinophil degranulation. J Immunol. 1989;142(7):2393–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Iikura M, Yamaguchi M, Fujisawa T, Miyamasu M, Takaishi T, Morita Y, et al. Secretory IgA induces degranulation of IL-3-primed basophils. J Immunol. 1998;161(3):1510–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Alvarez N, Otero O, Camacho F, Borrero R, Tirado Y, Puig A, et al. Passive administration of purified secretory IgA from human colostrum induces protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a murine model of progressive pulmonary infection. BMC Immunol. 2013;14(Suppl 1):S3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Phalipon A, Corthésy B. Novel functions of the polymeric Ig receptor: well beyond transport of immunoglobulins. Trends Immunol. 2003;24(2):55–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Tagliabue A, Boraschi D, Villa L, Keren DF, Lowell GH, Rappuoli R, et al. IgA-dependent cell-mediated activity against enteropathogenic bacteria: distribution, specificity, and characterization of the effector cells. J Immunol. 1984;133(2):988–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. de Vallière S, Abate G, Blazevic A, Heuertz RM, Hoft DF. Enhancement of innate and cell-mediated immunity by antimycobacterial antibodies. Infect Immun. 2005;73(10):6711–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Alvarez N, Infante JF, Borrero R, Mata D, Payan JB, Hossain MM, et al. Histopathological study of the lungs of mice receiving human secretory IgA and challenged with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Malays J Med Sci. 2014;21(3):31–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Wu M, Zhao H, Li M, Yue Y, Xiong S, Xu W. Intranasal vaccination with mannosylated chitosan formulated DNA vaccine enables robust IgA and cellular response induction in the lungs of mice and improves protection against pulmonary Mycobacterial challenge. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:445.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Ai W, Yue Y, Xiong S, Xu W. Enhanced protection against pulmonary mycobacterial challenge by chitosan-formulated polyepitope gene vaccine is associated with increased pulmonary secretory IgA and gamma-interferon(+) T cell responses. Microbiol Immunol. 2013;57(3):224–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Du X, Tan D, Gong Y, Zhang Y, Han J, Lv W, et al. A new poly(I:C)-decorated PLGA-PEG nanoparticle promotes Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion protein to induce comprehensive immune in mice. Microbial Pathog. 2022;162:1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Rodríguez A, Tjärnlund A, Ivanji J, Singh M, García I, Williams A, et al. Role of IgA in the defense against respiratory infections IgA deficient mice exhibited increased susceptibility to intranasal infection with Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Vaccine. 2005;23(20):2565–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Bjoraker J, Ryu J, Edwin M, Myers J, Tazelaar H, Schroeder D, et al. Prognostic significance of histopathologic subsets in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(1):199–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Khiroya R, Macaluso C, Montero M, Wells A, Chua F, Kokosi M, et al. Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: a review of histopathologic features and the relationship between histologic parameters and survival. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41(12):1683–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Shiomi A, Usui T. Pivotal roles of GM-CSF in autoimmunity and inflammation. Mediat Inflamm. 2015;2015: 568543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. van de Graaf EA, Out TA, Kobesen A, Jansen HM. Lactoferrin and secretory IgA in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with a stable asthma. Lung. 1991;169(5):275–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Kobayashi K, Suzukawa M, Watanabe K, Arakawa S, Igarashi S, Asari I, et al. Secretory IgA accumulated in the airspaces of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and promoted VEGF, TGF-β and IL-8 production by A549 cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 2020;199(3):326–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Aschner Y, Downey G. Transforming growth factor-β: master regulator of the respiratory system in health and disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2016;54(5):647–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Barratt S, Blythe T, Jarrett C, Ourradi K, Shelley-Fraser G, Day M, et al. Differential expression of VEGF-A isoforms is critical for development of pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(4):479–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. King TE Jr, Pardo A, Selman M. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lancet. 2011;378(9807):1949–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Borsutzky S, Cazac BB, Roes J, Guzmán CA. TGF-beta receptor signaling is critical for mucosal IgA responses. J Immunol. 2004;173(5):3305–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Chapman HA. Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in pulmonary fibrosis. Annu Rev Physiol. 2011;73:413–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kim KK, Kugler MC, Wolters PJ, Robillard L, Galvez MG, Brumwell AN, et al. Alveolar epithelial cell mesenchymal transition develops in vivo during pulmonary fibrosis and is regulated by the extracellular matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(35):13180–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Stockley RA, Burnett D. Local IgA production in patients with chronic bronchitis: effect of acute respiratory infection. Thorax. 1980;35(3):202–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Kanemaru R, Takahashi F, Kato M, Mitsuishi Y, Tajima K, Ihara H, et al. Dasatinib suppresses TGFβ-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition in alveolar epithelial cells and inhibits pulmonary fibrosis. Lung. 2018;196(5):531–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Ten Klooster L, van Moorsel CH, Kwakkel-van Erp JM, van Velzen-Blad H, Grutters JC. Immunoglobulin A in serum: an old acquaintance as a new prognostic biomarker in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015;181(2):357–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Graham RM, Chua AC, Herbison CE, Olynyk JK, Trinder D. Liver iron transport. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(35):4725–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Watanabe S, Kobayashi K, Suzukawa M, Igarashi S, Takada K, Imoto S, et al. Identification of ANXA2 on epithelial cells as a new receptor for secretory IgA using immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry. Clin Exp Immunol. 2022;208(3):351–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Powell RLR. Safety of breast/chest-feeding by those infected by SARS-CoV-2. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2022;25(2):129–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Li D, Calderone R, Nsouli TM, Reznikov E, Bellanti JA. Salivary and serum IgA and IgG responses to SARS-CoV-2-spike protein following SARS-CoV-2 infection and after immunization with COVID-19 vaccines. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2022;43(5):419–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Smit WL, van Tol S, van der Wal S, van Vulpen F, la Grouw S, van Lelyveld L, et al. Heterologous immune responses of serum IgG and secretory IgA against the spike protein of endemic coronaviruses during severe COVID-19. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 839367.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Tsukinoki K, Yamamoto T, Handa K, Iwamiya M, Saruta J, Ino S, et al. Detection of cross-reactive immunoglobulin A against the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 spike 1 subunit in saliva. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11): e0249979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Tsukinoki K, Yamamoto T, Saito J, Sakaguchi W, Iguchi K, Inoue Y, et al. Prevalence of saliva immunoglobulin A antibodies reactive with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 among Japanese people unexposed to the virus. Microbiol Immunol. 2022;66(8):403–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Jing QL, Liu MJ, Zhang ZB, Fang LQ, Yuan J, Zhang AR, et al. Household secondary attack rate of COVID-19 and associated determinants in Guangzhou, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(10):1141–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Zhang J, Litvinova M, Liang Y, Wang Y, Wang W, Zhao S, et al. Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Science. 2020;368(6498):1481–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Jafarzadeh A, Sadeghi M, Karam GA, Vazirinejad R. Salivary IgA and IgE levels in healthy subjects: relation to age and gender. Braz Oral Res. 2010;24(1):21–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Zhou Y, Lu K, Pfefferle S, Bertram S, Glowacka I, Drosten C, et al. A single asparagine-linked glycosylation site of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike glycoprotein facilitates inhibition by mannose-binding lectin through multiple mechanisms. J Virol. 2010;84(17):8753–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Byars SG, Stearns SC, Boomsma JJ. Association of long-term risk of respiratory, allergic, and infectious diseases with removal of adenoids and tonsils in childhood. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(7):594–603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Quinti I, Mortari EP, Fernandez Salinas A, Milito C, Carsetti R. IgA antibodies and IgA deficiency in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11: 655896.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Velikova T, Snegarova V, Kukov A, Batselova H, Mihova A, Nakov R. Gastrointestinal mucosal immunity and COVID-19. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(30):5047–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Hunagund S, Golan Y, Asiodu IV, Prahl M, Gaw SL. Effects of vaccination against influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19 on human milk antibodies: current evidence and implications for health equity. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 910383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Demers-Mathieu V, DaPra C, Fels S, Medo E. Receptor-binding domain severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibodies in human milk from mothers with coronavirus disease 2019 polymerase chain reaction or with symptoms suggestive of coronavirus disease 2019. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021;73(1):125–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Vasques da Costa A, Purcell Goes C, Gama P. Breastfeeding importance and its therapeutic potential against SARS-CoV-2. Physiol Rep. 2021;9(3):e14744.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Demers-Mathieu V, Do DM, Mathijssen GB, Sela DA, Seppo A, Järvinen KM, et al. Difference in levels of SARS-CoV-2 S1 and S2 subunits- and nucleocapsid protein-reactive SIgM/IgM, IgG and SIgA/IgA antibodies in human milk. J Perinatol. 2021;41(4):850–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Sheikh-Mohamed S, Isho B, Chao GYC, Zuo M, Cohen C, Lustig Y, et al. Systemic and mucosal IgA responses are variably induced in response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination and are associated with protection against subsequent infection. Mucosal Immunol. 2022;15(5):799–808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Sano K, Bhavsar D, Singh G, Floda D, Srivastava K, Gleason C, et al. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination induces mucosal antibody responses in previously infected individuals. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Ruetalo N, Flehmig B, Schindler M, Pridzun L, Haage A, Reichenbächer M, et al. Long-term humoral immune response against SARS-CoV-2 after natural infection and subsequent vaccination according to WHO international binding antibody units (BAU/mL). Viruses. 2021;13(12):2336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Cao X, Zai J, Zhao Q, Xie L, Li Y. Intranasal immunization with recombinant Vaccinia virus encoding trimeric SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain induces neutralizing antibody. Vaccine. 2022;40(40):5757–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Zheng B, Peng W, Guo M, Huang M, Gu Y, Wang T, et al. Inhalable nanovaccine with biomimetic coronavirus structure to trigger mucosal immunity of respiratory tract against COVID-19. Chem Eng J. 2021;418:129392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Ye ZW, Ong CP, Tang K, Fan Y, Luo C, Zhou R, et al. Intranasal administration of a single dose of a candidate live attenuated vaccine derived from an NSP16-deficient SARS-CoV-2 strain confers sterilizing immunity in animals. Cell Mol Immunol. 2022;19(5):588–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Turrubiates-Hernández FJ, Hernández-Bello J, Oregón-Romero E, González-Estevez G, Muñoz-Valle JF. The involvement of vitamin A in the production of secretory IgA in the respiratory epithelium for potential protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Rev Alerg Mex. 2021;68(3):185–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Kim E, Attia Z, Woodfint RM, Zeng C, Kim SH, Steiner HE, et al. Inhibition of elastase enhances the adjuvanticity of alum and promotes anti-SARS-CoV-2 systemic and mucosal immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(34):e2102435118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Rowe JC, Attia Z, Kim E, Cormet-Boyaka E, Boyaka PN. A novel supplementation approach to enhance host response to sublingual vaccination. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):715.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Attia Z, Rowe JC, Kim E, Varikuti S, Steiner HE, Zaghawa A, et al. Inhibitors of elastase stimulate murine B lymphocyte differentiation into IgG- and IgA-producing cells. Eur J Immunol. 2018;48(8):1295–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Ruiz MJ, Siracusano G, Cottignies-Calamarte A, Tudor D, Real F, Zhu A, et al. Persistent but dysfunctional mucosal SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA and low lung IL-1β associate with COVID-19 fatal outcome: a cross-sectional analysis. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 842468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Staats LAN, Pfeiffer H, Knopf J, Lindemann A, Fürst J, Kremer AE, et al. IgA2 antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 correlate with NET formation and fatal outcome in severely diseased COVID-19 patients. Cells. 2020;9(12):2676.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Melero I, Villalba-Esparza M, Recalde-Zamacona B, Jiménez-Sánchez D, Teijeira Á, Argueta A, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps, local IL-8 expression, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response in the lungs of patients with fatal COVID-19. Chest. 2022;162(5):1006–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Middleton EA, He XY, Denorme F, Campbell RA, Ng D, Salvatore SP, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to immunothrombosis in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Blood. 2020;136(10):1169–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Masso-Silva JA, Moshensky A, Lam MTY, Odish MF, Patel A, Xu L, et al. Increased peripheral blood neutrophil activation phenotypes and neutrophil extracellular trap formation in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: a case series and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74(3):479–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Sun H, Chen Y, Zou X, Li Q, Li H, Shu Y, et al. Salivary secretory immunoglobulin (SIgA) and lysozyme in malignant tumor patients. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8701423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Zheng H, Li M, Ren W, Zeng L, Liu H-D, Hu D, et al. Expression and secretion of immunoglobulin alpha heavy chain with diverse VDJ recombinations by human epithelial cancer cells. Mol Immunol. 2007;44(9):2221–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Dudas SP, Chatterjee M, Tainsky MA. Usage of cancer associated autoantibodies in the detection of disease. Cancer Biomark. 2010;6(5–6):257–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Sava G, Bergamo A, Capozzi I, Clerici K, Pacor S, Gagliardi R, et al. Stimulation of GALT and activation of mesenteric lymph node lymphocytes by a modified lysozyme in CBA mice with MCa mammary carcinoma. J Exp Ther Oncol. 1996;1(6):342–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. de Lustig ES, Matos E, Spector C, Scheitman B, Diaz A. Secretory IgA content in human normal and tumoral bronchial mucosa in vitro. Oncology. 1980;37(1):16–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Iglehart JD, Warzynski MJ, Montelaro RC, Bolognesi DP, Sabiston DC Jr, Wolfe WG. Function of the secretory immune system in bronchogenic carcinoma. Immunoglobulin A levels in respiratory secretions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981;82(1):63–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Wesselius LJ, Dark DS, Hanson FN, Wheaton DL. Airway secretory IgA concentrations in patients with lung cancer. Evaluation of the uninvolved lung. Chest. 1989;95(6):1265–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Atis S, Tutluoglu B, Salepci B, Ocal Z. Serum IgA and secretory IgA levels in bronchial lavages from patients with a variety of respiratory diseases. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2001;11(2):112–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Shuangfei Liu for his help and different aspects of manuscript.

Funding

Suzhou Minsheng Major Science and Technology Project (SYSD2,020,010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, No. 438, Jiefang Road, Jingkou District, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China

    Xintian Wang, Yan Wu, Yuncong Xu & Jinxu Zheng

  2. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Aoyang Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University, No. 279, Jingang Avenue, Zhangjiagang, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

    Jun Zhang

Authors
  1. Xintian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuncong Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jinxu Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The outline of this study was conceived by ZJX. WXT, ZJ, WY, and XYC performed the literature study. The first manuscript and figure were performed by WXT, ZJ, WY, and XYC. All authors contributed to this article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinxu Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Zhang, J., Wu, Y. et al. SIgA in various pulmonary diseases. Eur J Med Res 28, 299 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01282-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01282-5

Keywords

European Journal of Medical Research

ISSN: 2047-783X

Contact us