Skip to main content
Download PDF

Nonlinear relationship between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality in ICU acute respiratory failure patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

European Journal of Medical Research volume 29, Article number: 312 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Limited evidence exists regarding the link between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality in acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients. Thus, this study aims to investigate this association among ICU patients experiencing acute respiratory failure.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study across multiple centers, utilizing data from the US eICU-CRD v2.0 database covering 22,262 patients with ARF in the ICU from 2014 to 2015. Our aim was to investigate the correlation between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality using binary logistic regression, subgroup analyses, and smooth curve fitting.

Results

The 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was 19.73% (4393 out of 22,262), with a median platelet count of 213 × 109/L. After adjusting for covariates, our analysis revealed an inverse association between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.99, 0.99). Subgroup analyses supported the robustness of these findings. Furthermore, a nonlinear relationship was identified between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality, with the inflection point at 120 × 109/L. Below the inflection point, the effect size (OR) was 0.89 (0.87, 0.91), indicating a significant association. However, beyond this point, the relationship was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

This study establishes a clear negative association between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality among ICU patients with ARF. Furthermore, we have identified a nonlinear relationship with saturation effects, indicating that among ICU patients with acute respiratory failure, the lowest 30-day in-hospital mortality rate occurs when the baseline platelet count is approximately 120 × 109/L.

Introduction

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is typically defined as the simultaneous occurrence of clinically significant hypoxia, hypercapnia, or both [1]. Approximately 784 cases per 100,000 hospitalized patients experience ARF [2]. One of the primary reasons adults admitted to the ICU is the need for tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation support [3, 4]. Globally, around 20 million individuals require mechanical ventilation support annually [5]. While advancements like veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) have enhanced survival rates [5,6,7], the mortality rate still ranges from 27 to 35% [8, 9]. Therefore, the identification of prognostic risk factors for ARF patients is crucial.

Platelets, produced by small megakaryocytes measuring 2–4 μm, circulate for approximately 7–10 days and play a primary role in hemostasis and coagulation [10, 11]. Beyond their established function in thrombosis, recent research has linked platelets to various physiological and pathological processes. Specifically, platelets may contribute to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) development through activation, aggregation, and regulation of hypoxic signaling pathways [12]. Notably, platelets play a crucial role in both the progression and resolution of acute respiratory distress syndrome [13]. Moreover, in patients infected with COVID-19, microthrombosis mediated by platelet activation in alveolar capillaries is a significant mechanism leading to ARF [14,15,16,17]. Rohling et al. reported a slight increase in platelet count among patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms, while patients with severe COVID-19 exhibited a decrease in platelet count [18]. These findings underscore the multifaceted role of platelets in various physiological and pathological contexts, particularly in relation to respiratory diseases.

Currently, there is a lack of epidemiological evidence linking platelet count to the prognosis of patients with ARF. Specifically, within the population of ICU inpatients with unique physiological characteristics, no reports exist on this relationship. However, given that previous studies have indicated platelets as not only crucial hemostatic and coagulation indicators but also linked to various diseases, we hypothesize that the baseline platelet count before treatment may correlate with a poor prognosis in ICU-hospitalized ARF patients. Establishing this correlation could offer a fresh perspective for future research in this domain. To address this gap, utilizing high-quality data from multiple centers and large samples can provide reliable evidence for subsequent studies exploring similar themes.

Therefore, we analyzed the eICU-CRD v2.0 to investigate the relationship between baseline platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with ARF.

Methods

Study design

This multicenter retrospective cohort study centers on platelet count as the independent variable and 30-day in-hospital mortality in patients with ARF as the dependent variable, categorized into death or survival.

Data source

The eICU-CRD v2.0 is a substantial public database collaboratively established by Philips Healthcare and the Laboratory of Computational Physiology (LCP) at MIT. This database encompasses high-quality data from 200,859 patients admitted to intensive care units in 208 U.S. hospitals during 2014 and 2015. It includes diverse clinical information such as vital signs, nursing plans, disease severity, diagnosis, and treatment details [19]. Access to the data is available to the public upon registration, and the collection process adheres to the standards of the MIT Ethics Committee (No: 0403000206) and aligns with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Study population

This study involved 22,262 eligible individuals, identified through specific exclusion criteria: (1) non-ARF patients (n = 173,270 excluded); (2) age < 18 years (n = 30 excluded); (3) ICU stay time < 24 h or > 30 days (n = 4439 excluded); (4) missing in-hospital mortality data (n = 291 excluded); (5) missing platelet count (n = 266 excluded); and (6) extreme platelet count values (three standard deviations above or below the mean) (n = 301 excluded). Following the application of these criteria, 22,262 participants remained for analysis. Figure 1 illustrates the participant selection process.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of study participants

Full size image

Variables

The platelet count was first recorded as a continuous variable and later categorized into quartiles: Q1 (2.0–156.0 × 109/L), Q2 (157.0–212.0 × 109/L), Q3 (213.0–278.0 × 109/L), and Q4 (279.0–569.0 × 109/L).

Covariates

Covariates were selected based on clinical experience and prior studies [20,21,22,23,24]. The included variables comprised as follows: (1) categorical variables such as sex, ethnicity, atrial fibrillation (AF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal bleeding (GB), hypertension, sepsis, and the use of anti-platelet medications, anticoagulants, glucocorticoids, carbapenems, cephalosporins, vancomycin, and mechanical ventilation; (2) continuous variables including age, body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin concentration (Hb), serum creatinine (Scr), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-IV score (APACHE-IV score). BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared (kg/m2). Baseline parameters were gathered within 24 h of ICU admission.

Missing data processing

In this study, the percentages of participants with missing data for sex, BMI, Scr, and APACHE-IV score were 0.02%, 2.29%, 2.6%, and 13.39%, respectively. To address missing covariate data, multiple imputations were employed [25]. The imputation model included ethnicity, age, Hb, AF, ACS, CHF, CKD, COPD, diabetes mellitus, GB, hypertension, sepsis, use of anti-platelet medications, anticoagulants, glucocorticoids, carbapenems, cephalosporins, vancomycin, and mechanical ventilation. The missing data analysis assumption was based on the missing-at-random assumption (MAR) [26].

Statistical analysis

Participants were divided into four groups according to their platelet count quartiles. Continuous variables are expressed as mean (standard deviation) for normally distributed data and median (range) for nonnormally distributed data. Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. We utilized one-way analysis of variance for normally distributed data, the χ2 method for categorical variables, or the Kruskal–Wallis H test for skewed distribution to assess differences between platelet count groups.

To analyze the independent linear relationship of the platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality

After conducting collinearity screening (Table S1: no covariates were excluded), three models were developed using univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression, following the STROBE statement guidelines [27]. The objective was to explore the connection between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality. The constructed models were as follows: (1) crude model (no covariate adjustments); (2) minimally adjusted model (model I: adjusted for sex, age, and ethnicity); and (3) fully adjusted model (model II: adjusted for sex, ethnicity, age, BMI, Hb, Scr, APACHE-IV score, AF, ACS, CHF, CKD, COPD, diabetes mellitus, GB, hypertension, sepsis, anti-platelet, anticoagulant, glucocorticoid, carbapenems, cephalosporins, vancomycin, and mechanical ventilation). Recorded effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) facilitated result interpretation. Covariate adjustments were applied if their inclusion led to a change in the odds ratio (OR) of 10% or more [27]. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess result robustness. Platelet count categorization into quartiles allowed the calculation of P for trend to test continuous variable outcomes and explore nonlinearity. Additionally, potential unmeasured confounding between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality was examined using E-values.

Subgroup analysis

Subgroup analyses employed a stratified binary logistic regression model, covering various subgroups such as sex, ethnicity, AF, ACS, CHF, CKD, COPD, diabetes mellitus, GB, hypertension, sepsis, and mechanical ventilation. Each stratum, determined by the stratification factor, was adjusted for all relevant factors, including sex, ethnicity, age, BMI, Hb, Scr, APACHE-IV score, AF, ACS, CHF, CKD, COPD, diabetes mellitus, GB, hypertension, sepsis, anti-platelet, anticoagulant, glucocorticoid, carbapenems, cephalosporins, vancomycin, and mechanical ventilation. Additionally, interaction tests were conducted using the likelihood ratio test, comparing models with and without interaction terms [28, 29].

To analyze the nonlinear relationship of the platelet and 30-day in-hospital mortality

Utilizing binary logistic regression models can sometimes be limited in addressing nonlinearity. To address this concern, we applied generalized additive models (GAM) and employed smooth curve fitting (penalized spline method) to further investigate the nonlinear relationship between the platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality. In the presence of nonlinearity, our approach involved initially determining the inflection point through a recursive algorithm. Subsequently, we established a two-piece binary logistic regression model on either side of the inflection point [30]. The log-likelihood ratio test was then employed to identify the most appropriate model that describes the association between the platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality.

All results adhere to the STROBE statement [27]. Analyses were conducted using statistical software packages R (R Foundation)2 and EmpowerStats3 (X&Y Solutions, Inc., Boston, MA). Statistically significant findings were determined at a threshold of P < 0.05 (two sided).

Results

Characteristics of individuals

Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of 22,262 participants stratified by platelet count quartiles. The distribution of participants differed significantly by sex and ethnicity across quartiles (both P < 0.05). Notably, the proportion of males decreased from 60.4% in Q1 to 44.8% in Q4, while the proportion of females increased from 39.6% in Q1 to 55.2% in Q4. Similarly, the distribution of ethnicity varied across quartiles (P = 0.012). Age, body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin (Hb), serum creatinine (Scr), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-IV (APACHE-IV) score differed significantly across quartiles (all P < 0.001), with a trend of decreasing values from Q1 to Q4. The prevalence of comorbid conditions including atrial fibrillation (AF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal bleeding (GB), hypertension, and sepsis also showed significant differences across quartiles (all P < 0.01), with a trend of decreasing prevalence from Q1 to Q4 for most conditions. Notably, the use of anti-platelets, carbapenems, and vancomycin, as well as the requirement for mechanical ventilation, demonstrated significant differences across quartiles (all P < 0.05). Mortality also varied significantly across quartiles, with the highest mortality in Q1 (25.27%) and lowest in Q3 (17.30%, P < 0.001). Additionally, platelet count is classified into four categories based on the degree of platelet reduction (Table S2). This study included a total of 22,262 participants, of whom 473 (2.13%) had very low platelet counts (< 50.0 × 109/L), 1337 (6.01%) had intermediate-low platelet counts (50.0–100.0 × 109/L), 3,134 (14.08%) had low platelet counts (100.0–150.0 × 109/L), and 17,318 (77.78%) had normal platelet counts (≥ 150.0 × 109/L). The 30-day in-hospital mortality rate decreased as platelet count increased, from 42.92% in the very low platelet count group to 17.92% in the normal platelet count group (P < 0.001).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants (N = 22,262)
Full size table

Figure 2 depicts the distribution of platelet count, presenting an approximately normal distribution within the range of 2.0 × 109/L to 569.0 × 109/L, with a median of 213.0 × 109/L. In Fig. 3, participants were categorized into two groups based on survival status. The platelet count distribution in the death group was notably lower, while the survival group exhibited a relatively higher platelet count.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of platelet count. It displayed a nearly normal distribution ranging from 2.0 × 109/L to 569.0 × 109/L, with a median of 213.0 × 109/L

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Platelet count levels in the survival and death groups. The figure illustrates lower platelet counts in the death group compared to the relatively higher platelet distribution in the survival group

Full size image

30-Day in-hospital mortality results

Table 2 presents the 30-day in-hospital mortality rates stratified by platelet count quartiles in a cohort of 22,262 critically ill patients. The overall incidence of mortality was 19.73% (4393/22262). A clear inverse association between platelet count quartiles and 30-day in-hospital mortality is evident. The mortality rates decreased with increasing platelet count quartiles, with a significant trend observed (P for trend < 0.0001). Specifically, the mortality rates for quartiles Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 were 25.27% (95% CI 24.13–26.42), 18.20% (95% CI 17.18–19.21), 17.30% (95% CI 16.30–18.29), and 17.51% (95% CI 16.51–18.52), respectively. A discernible downward trend in mortality rates is observed from lower to higher platelet count quartiles, as supported by the significant P for trend < 0.0001 (see Fig. 4). The findings of this study highlight the potential utility of platelet count as a prognostic marker for 30-day in-hospital mortality in ARF patients. The inverse relationship between platelet count and mortality rates suggests that platelet levels may serve as an important indicator of clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Table 2 Association between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality in acute respiratory failure patients
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

30-Day in-hospital mortality across platelet count quartiles

Full size image

Univariate analyses results using a binary logistic regression model

Table S3 reports the results of univariate regression analysis of factors influencing 30-day in-hospital mortality. Older age was significantly associated with higher mortality (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02–1.02, P < 0.0001). Lower body mass index (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, P < 0.001), hemoglobin (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.92–0.95, P < 0.0001), platelet count (OR 1.00, 95% CI 1.00–1.00, P < 0.0001), and higher creatinine (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03–1.07, P < 0.0001) and APACHE-IV score (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02–1.03, P < 0.0001) also predicted higher mortality risk. AF (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.59–1.89, P < 0.0001), ACS (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.20–1.50, P < 0.0001), CKD (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12–1.71, P = 0.0028), GB (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.45–1.89, P < 0.0001), and sepsis (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.43–1.65, P < 0.0001) were associated with increased mortality. Chronic heart failure was not associated with mortality (P = 0.6945). The use of anticoagulants (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.06–1.47, P = 0.0092), carbapenems (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.52–2.21, P < 0.0001), vancomycin (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.30–1.57, P < 0.0001), and mechanical ventilation (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.64–1.90, P < 0.0001) were linked to higher mortality. Sex, ethnicity, hypertension, anti-platelets, glucocorticoids, and cephalosporins did not influence mortality (all P > 0.05).

Multivariate analyses results using the binary logistic regression model

Table 3 delves into the association between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality through crude, adjusted, and fully adjusted logistic regression models. In the crude model, a 10 × 109/L increase in platelet count is linked to a 2% decrease in mortality rate (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, P < 0.0001). In the minimally adjusted model (Model I), where adjustments were made solely for demographic variables (age, sex, and ethnicity), each 10 × 109/L rise in platelet count corresponds to a 2% decrease in mortality rate (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, P < 0.001). (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, P < 0.0001). In the fully adjusted model (Model II), a 10 × 109/L increase in platelet count is associated with a 1% decrease in mortality rate (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.99–0.99, P < 0.0001). Significantly, in all three models, the mortality risk of Q2, Q3, and Q4 was lower than that in Q1, and the dose–response relationship remained significant (all P for trend < 0.001). The study findings consistently demonstrate an independent and significant inverse association between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality, with a graded protective effect observed across platelet count quartiles. Additionally, we computed an E-value to evaluate sensitivity to unmeasured confounding, which was determined to be 1.11. This value, exceeding the relative risk of unmeasured confounders and platelet count, indicates that unknown or unmeasured confounders had minimal impact on the relationship between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality.

Table 3 Relationship between platelet and 30-day in-hospital mortality in different models
Full size table

Subgroup analysis results

We designated sex, ethnicity, AF, ACS, CHF, CKD, COPD, diabetes mellitus, GB, hypertension, sepsis, and mechanical ventilation as predetermined effect modifiers. Our objective was to observe the stability of the association between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality across various subgroups. Based on the results presented in Table 4, the interaction analysis and subgroup analysis revealed several important findings related to the association between various characteristics and 30-day in-hospital mortality. There were significant interactions between platelet count and sex (P for interaction = 0.0114), ethnicity (P for interaction = 0.0476), COPD (P for interaction = 0.0186), diabetes mellitus (P for interaction = 0.0198), and GB (P for interaction = 0.0010). Specifically, lower platelet count was significantly associated with higher mortality in female patients (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, P < 0.0001) but not in male patients (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99–1.00, P = 0.0100). Caucasian patients had a significant association between lower platelet count and mortality (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99–0.99, P < 0.0001), while the association was not significant in African American and Asian patients. Among patients with COPD, lower platelet count was associated with increased mortality (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99–1.01, P = 0.9907) but not without COPD (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the association was significant in patients without diabetes (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, P < 0.0001) but not with diabetes (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99–1.01, P = 0.7982). Patients with GB had a stronger association between lower platelet count and mortality (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95–0.98, P < 0.0001) compared to those without GB. There were no significant interactions between platelet count and atrial fibrillation, acute coronary syndrome, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, sepsis, or mechanical ventilation (all P for interaction > 0.05). This nuanced understanding of the interplay between platelet count and mortality risk can ultimately contribute to improved patient outcomes and healthcare delivery.

Table 4 Results of interaction analysis and subgroup analysis
Full size table

Addressing nonlinearity with generalized additive models (GAM)

In this study, we employed GAM to explore potential nonlinearities in the relationship between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality (refer to Fig. 5). Following adjustments for various factors such as sex, ethnicity, age, BMI, Hb, Scr, APACHE-IV score, AF, ACS, CHF, CKD, COPD, diabetes mellitus, GB, hypertension, sepsis, anti-platelet, anticoagulant, glucocorticoid, carbapenems, cephalosporins, vancomycin, and mechanical ventilation, a significant nonlinear association emerged (Log-likelihood ratio test P < 0.0001). Table 5 presents the results of a two-piecewise linear regression model examining the relationship between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality. The inflection point of the platelet count was determined to be 120 × 109/L. For patients with platelet counts less than or equal to 120 × 109/L, each 10 × 109/L increase in platelet count is significantly associated with a decreased mortality rate, with a ratio of 0.89 (95% CI 0.87–0.91, P < 0.0001). This suggests that higher platelet levels in this range were protective against short-term mortality. Conversely, for patients with platelet counts greater than 120 × 109/L, there was no significant relationship between platelet count and mortality (OR: 1.00, 95% CI 1.00–1.00, P = 0.7057). This indicates that further increases in platelet levels did not provide additional survival benefits in this patient group. The log-likelihood ratio test yielded a highly significant result (P < 0.001), indicating that the two-piecewise regression model provided a significantly better fit to the data than the standard linear regression model.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The nonlinear relationship between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality. A nonlinear relationship was detected after adjusting for sex, ethnicity, age, BMI, Hb, Scr, APACHE-IV score, AF, ACS, CHF, CKD, COPD, Diabetes mellitus, GB, hypertension, sepsis, anti-platelet, anticoagulant, glucocorticoid, carbapenems, cephalosporins, vancomycin, and mechanical ventilation (Log-likelihood ratio test P < 0.001)

Full size image
Table 5 The result of the two-piecewise linear regression model
Full size table

Discussion

This study employed multicenter eICU-CRD v2.0 data to investigate the connection between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality among ICU patients with ARF. The results indicate that a higher platelet count is significantly associated with a reduced risk of mortality. Notably, this correlation is more pronounced in women, Caucasian patients, and those with COPD, diabetes, or GB. A threshold effect curve highlights distinct associations between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality on either side of the inflection point. Below 120 × 109/L, each 10 × 109/L increase in platelet count is linked to an 11% decrease in the 30-day hospitalization mortality rate. However, beyond 120 × 109/L, the elevation in platelet levels no longer significantly impacts mortality.

The link between platelet count and adverse outcomes in critically ill patients is gaining attention. Thachil et al. highlighted low platelet count as a common hematological issue and a risk factor for poor prognosis in ICU-treated patients [31, 32]. In a cohort study involving 215,098 ICU patients, Jonsson et al. found a connection between thrombocytopenia and increased mortality [33]. Anthon et al. conducted a prospective cohort study across 52 ICUs with 1166 patients, revealing that 43% of critically ill patients developed thrombocytopenia, resulting in worse outcomes, including higher mortality [34]. These studies emphasize platelet count as a crucial prognostic indicator for critically ill ICU patients. Moreover, in a retrospective study with 167 COVID-19 ICU patients, Zhu et al. discovered that thrombocytopenia not only correlated with respiratory function decline but also increased mortality in severe COVID-19 cases [35]. These studies all prompt us to pay attention to the relationship between thrombocytopenia and the prognosis of ARF. Despite this information, there is a noticeable gap in literature regarding the relationship between baseline platelet count and the 30-day risk of in-hospital mortality in ICU ARF patients, especially the saturation effect relationship. Prompted by these observations, we aimed to explore the correlation between baseline platelet levels and the 30-day in-hospital mortality risk in ICU ARF patients.

This study not only established an association between low baseline platelet count and increased mortality in ICU ARF patients but also identified a saturation threshold effect. Initially, the authors examined the linear relationship between baseline thrombocytopenia and the 30-day in-hospital death risk in ICU ARF patients through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A higher platelet count demonstrated a significant and independent correlation with lower 30-day mortality in a dose-dependent manner (P for trend 0.0001). Additionally, this relationship is more obvious in women, Caucasian patients and patients with COPD, diabetes or GB through subgroup risk analysis (P for interaction < 0.05). Furthermore, employing GAM and smooth curve fitting methods, the authors delved into the nonlinear relationship between platelet counts and 30-day in-hospital death in ARF patients. Clinically, this implies that among patients with severe thrombocytopenia, even modest increases in platelet count confer meaningful survival benefits. However, once the count surpasses approximately 120 × 109/L, additional increments cease to impact prognosis. This nonlinear relationship provides a reference for clinical risk assessment, which is of significant importance. In summary, the two-piecewise regression model revealed a clinically informative inflection point in the platelet–mortality association.

Building on prior research, we propose that thrombocytopenia and increased 30-day in-hospital mortality share common underlying mechanisms. Firstly, platelets play a crucial role in hemostasis and coagulation [11]. Thrombocytopenia raises the risk of primary or secondary hemorrhage in vital organs, reducing overall survival rates, a particular concern in critical ICU settings. Secondly, thrombocytopenia serves as an indirect marker of heightened illness severity [31, 36,37,38,39]. Patients with lower platelet counts often require more intensive medical interventions, such as increased use of vasoactive drugs, renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation. As confirmed by Table 1 in this study, higher platelet counts were associated with a younger, healthier demographic with fewer comorbidities. In contrast, the Q1 group exhibited elevated creatinine levels, higher APACHE-IV scores, and a greater incidence of complications like gastrointestinal bleeding, sepsis, and CKD, all indicative of an increased risk of mortality (all P < 0.05). Notably, invasive mechanical ventilation is linked to serious adverse events, and avoiding unnecessary tracheal intubation remains a primary goal of treating patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure [40]. Consequently, patients with low platelet counts are prone to prolonged ICU hospitalization and increased mortality. Thirdly, platelets are recognized as the first responders in innate immunity, engaging with pathogens, including bacteria and viruses, via various surface receptors [41,42,43]. Operating as immune cells, platelets also interact with other immune entities like neutrophils, monocytes, dendritic cells, and lymphocytes [44]. Individuals with thrombocytopenia lose their ability to deposit fibrinogen, guide neutrophil migration, and block damaged vascular systems after diapause [13]. These factors suggest that patients with lower baseline platelet counts may experience compromised immunity, elevating their risk of mortality. The mentioned reasons likely contribute to the observed negative correlation between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality on the left side of this study's inflection point. Conversely, on the right side of the inflection point, this relationship loses statistical significance, possibly due to worsening patient conditions and increased influence of other confounding factors. Therefore, the authors assert that maintaining an appropriate platelet count is crucial.

Our study has notable strengths that enhance the depth and reliability of our findings. The multicenter design and relatively large sample size significantly contribute to the generalizability of our results. The uniqueness of our research lies in its focus on ICU ARF patients, a population not extensively studied in this context before. Additionally, our exploration of nonlinearity adds a nuanced layer to our understanding of the relationship between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality, surpassing previous studies' scope. Using multiple imputations to handle missing data ensures the mitigation of potential bias, maximizing statistical power. We further strengthen our findings through interaction and subgroup analysis and calculating E-values. Beyond academic significance, the practical implications of our study are also evident in the economic and accessible nature of platelet count as a common laboratory measure.

This work, however, has certain limitations. Firstly, our study focuses only on Americans and requires additional validation across different geographical and racial groups, and the study population consists of patients admitted to the ICU a decade ago, which may not fully reflect current clinical realities, necessitating further research. Secondly, the observational nature of our study design prevents establishing definitive causality. Despite this, we meticulously adjusted for confounding factors, ensuring robustness through subgroup analysis. The calculated E-value also suggests that unmeasured confounders are unlikely to significantly impact the results. Thirdly, the absence of acute respiratory failure (ARF) classification data and the etiology of ARF in our database hampers a detailed exploration of the relationship between platelet count and specific ARF subtypes. It is essential to note that our study exclusively included ICU-hospitalized ARF patients, and verification is needed for those not admitted to the ICU. These considerations emphasize the importance of incorporating more detailed variables in the design of future studies.

In summary, this study uncovers a negative and nonlinear correlation between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality in ICU ARF patients. Importantly, a threshold effect is noted, signifying a significant negative association when the platelet count is ≤ 120 × 109/L. However, when the platelet count surpasses 120 × 109/L, this relationship loses statistical significance. These insights provide clinicians with valuable references for risk assessment, which is of significant importance.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. All data are sourced from the eICU-CRD v2.0 database.

References

  1. Baldomero AK, Melzer AC, Greer N, Majeski BN, MacDonald R, Linskens EJ, Wilt TJ. Effectiveness and harms of high-flow nasal oxygen for acute respiratory failure: an evidence report for a clinical guideline from the American college of physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(7):952–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dziadzko MA, Novotny PJ, Sloan J, Gajic O, Herasevich V, Mirhaji P, Wu Y, Gong MN. Multicenter derivation and validation of an early warning score for acute respiratory failure or death in the hospital. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyle AJ, Madotto F, Laffey JG, Bellani G, Pham T, Pesenti A, Thompson BT, O’Kane CM, Deane AM, McAuley DF. Identifying associations between diabetes and acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: an analysis of the LUNG SAFE database. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis SR, Baker PE, Parker R, Smith AF. High-flow nasal cannulae for respiratory support in adult intensive care patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;3(3): Cd010172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Seeliger B, Döbler M, Friedrich R, Stahl K, Kühn C, Bauersachs J, Steinhagen F, Ehrentraut SF, Schewe JC, Putensen C, et al. Comparison of anticoagulation strategies for veno-venous ECMO support in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care. 2021;24(1):701.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nunez JI, Gosling AF, O’Gara B, Kennedy KF, Rycus P, Abrams D, Brodie D, Shaefi S, Garan AR, Grandin EW. Bleeding and thrombotic events in adults supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an ELSO registry analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(2):213–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Supady A, Combes A, Barbaro RP, Camporota L, Diaz R, Fan E, Giani M, Hodgson C, Hough CL, Karagiannidis C, et al. Respiratory indications for ECMO: focus on COVID-19. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(10):1326–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Schønemann-Lund M, Itenov TS, Larsson JE, Lindegaard B, Johansson PI, Bestle MH. Endotheliopathy is associated with slower liberation from mechanical ventilation: a cohort study. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ketcham SW, Sedhai YR, Miller HC, Bolig TC, Ludwig A, Co I, Claar D, McSparron JI, Prescott HC, Sjoding MW. Causes and characteristics of death in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Raghunathan S, Rayes J, Sen Gupta A. Platelet-inspired nanomedicine in hemostasis thrombosis and thromboinflammation. J Thromb Haemost. 2022;20(7):1535–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Quach ME, Chen W, Li R. Mechanisms of platelet clearance and translation to improve platelet storage. Blood. 2018;131(14):1512–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mallah H, Ball S, Sekhon J, Parmar K, Nugent K. Platelets in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an update on pathophysiology and implications for antiplatelet therapy. Respir Med. 2020;171: 106098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Washington AV, Esponda O, Gibson A. Platelet biology of the rapidly failing lung. Br J Haematol. 2020;188(5):641–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barale C, Melchionda E, Morotti A, Russo I. Prothrombotic phenotype in COVID-19: focus on platelets. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(24):13638.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ackermann M, Verleden SE, Kuehnel M, Haverich A, Welte T, Laenger F, Vanstapel A, Werlein C, Stark H, Tzankov A, et al. Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(2):120–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mackman N, Antoniak S, Wolberg AS, Kasthuri R, Key NS. Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and other pandemic viruses. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40(9):2033–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gu SX, Tyagi T, Jain K, Gu VW, Lee SH, Hwa JM, Kwan JM, Krause DS, Lee AI, Halene S, et al. Thrombocytopathy and endotheliopathy: crucial contributors to COVID-19 thromboinflammation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(3):194–209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rohlfing AK, Rath D, Geisler T, Gawaz M. Platelets and COVID-19. Hamostaseologie. 2021;41(5):379–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pollard TJ, Johnson AEW, Raffa JD, Celi LA, Mark RG, Badawi O. The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research. Sci Data. 2018;5: 180178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Qin X, Cen J, Hu H, Chen X, Wei Z, Wan Q, Cao R. Non-linear relationship between albumin-corrected calcium and 30-day in-hospital mortality in ICU patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:1059201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang Z, Li Z, He X, Yao Z, Xie X, Zhang S, Shen Y, Li S, Qiao S, Hui Z, et al. The impact of heart rate circadian rhythm on in-hospital mortality in patients with stroke and critically ill: Insights from the eICU Collaborative Research Database. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19(8):1325–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Serpa Neto A, Deliberato RO, Johnson AEW, Bos LD, Amorim P, Pereira SM, Cazati DC, Cordioli RL, Correa TD, Pollard TJ, et al. Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: an analysis of patients in two observational cohorts. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(11):1914–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. van den Boom W, Hoy M, Sankaran J, Liu M, Chahed H, Feng M, See KC. The search for optimal oxygen saturation targets in critically ill patients: observational data from large ICU databases. Chest. 2020;157(3):566–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang LX, Liu RL, Zhou P, Hu HF, Deng Z. Nonlinear relationship between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality in intensive care unit stroke patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1374159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Groenwold RH, White IR, Donders AR, Carpenter JR, Altman DG, Moons KG. Missing covariate data in clinical research: when and when not to use the missing-indicator method for analysis. CMAJ. 2012;184(11):1265–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011;30(4):377–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mullee A, Romaguera D, Pearson-Stuttard J, Viallon V, Stepien M, Freisling H, Fagherazzi G, Mancini FR, Boutron-Ruault MC, Kühn T, et al. Association between soft drink consumption and mortality in 10 European countries. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(11):1479–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Keidel D, Anto JM, Basagaña X, Bono R, Burte E, Carsin AE, Forsberg B, Fuertes E, Galobardes B, Heinrich J, et al. The role of socioeconomic status in the association of lung function and air pollution-a pooled analysis of three adult ESCAPE cohorts. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(11):1901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rothenbacher D, Rehm M, Iacoviello L, Costanzo S, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Belch JJF, Söderberg S, Hultdin J, Salomaa V, Jousilahti P, et al. Contribution of cystatin C- and creatinine-based definitions of chronic kidney disease to cardiovascular risk assessment in 20 population-based and 3 disease cohorts: the BiomarCaRE project. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Thachil J, Warkentin TE. How do we approach thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients? Br J Haematol. 2017;177(1):27–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zarychanski R, Houston DS. Assessing thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit: the past, present, and future. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017;2017(1):660–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jonsson AB, Rygård SL, Hildebrandt T, Perner A, Møller MH, Russell L. Thrombocytopenia in intensive care unit patients: a scoping review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021;65(1):2–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Anthon CT, Pène F, Perner A, Azoulay E, Puxty K, Van De Louw A, Barratt-Due A, Chawla S, Castro P, Póvoa P, et al. Thrombocytopenia and platelet transfusions in ICU patients: an international inception cohort study (PLOT-ICU). Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(11):1327–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu Y, Zhang J, Li Y, Liu F, Zhou Q, Peng Z. Association between thrombocytopenia and 180-day prognosis of COVID-19 patients in intensive care units: a two-center observational study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3): e0248671.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Shin J, Kwon D, Youn SK, Park JH. Characteristics and factors associated with death among patients hospitalized for severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, South Korea, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(10):1704–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen Q, Yang D, Zhang Y, Zhu M, Chen N, Yushan Z. Transmission and mortality risk assessment of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in China: results from 11-years’ study. Infect Dis Poverty. 2022;11(1):93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Vincent JL, Castro P, Hunt BJ, Jörres A, Praga M, Rojas-Suarez J, Watanabe E. Thrombocytopenia in the ICU: disseminated intravascular coagulation and thrombotic microangiopathies-what intensivists need to know. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. He S, Fan C, Ma J, Tang C, Chen Y. Platelet transfusion in patients with sepsis and thrombocytopenia: a propensity score-matched analysis using a large ICU database. Front Med. 2022;9: 830177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ferreyro BL, Angriman F, Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Ferguson ND, Rochwerg B, Ryu MJ, Saskin R, Wunsch H, da Costa BR, Scales DC. Association of noninvasive oxygenation strategies with all-cause mortality in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020;324(1):57–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mussbacher M, Brunnthaler L, Panhuber A, Starlinger P, Assinger A. Till death do us part-the multifaceted role of platelets in liver diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(6):3113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kerrigan SW, Devine T, Fitzpatrick G, Thachil J, Cox D. Early host interactions that drive the dysregulated response in sepsis. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1748.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Alonso AL, Cox D. Platelet interactions with viruses and parasites. Platelets. 2015;26(4):317–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Koupenova M, Clancy L, Corkrey HA, Freedman JE. Circulating platelets as mediators of immunity, inflammation, and thrombosis. Circ Res. 2018;122(2):337–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by Shenzhen Key Basic Research Project (JCYJ20180228163014668), and Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital Clinical Research Fund of Guangdong Province High-level Hospital Construction Project (Grant No. 20223357005 & No. 2023xgyj3357002).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Pan Zhou, Qin-qin Guo and Fang-xi Wang contributed equally to this work and are acknowledged as the co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, 518035, China

    Pan Zhou, Qin-qin Guo, Fang-xi Wang, Li Zhou & Zhe Deng

  2. Department of Nephrology, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, 518035, China

    Hao-fei Hu

Authors
  1. Pan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qin-qin Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fang-xi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Li Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hao-fei Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhe Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Pan Zhou performed data analysis and manuscript draft; Qin-qin Guo and Fang-xi Wang performed critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; Li Zhou drafted the manuscript; Hao-fei Hu was involved in administrative, technical, and material support and study supervision; Zhe Deng contributed to study concept and design.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hao-fei Hu or Zhe Deng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

40001_2024_1909_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary Material 1. Table S1. Collinearity diagnostics steps. Table S2. Baseline characteristics of participants (N = 22,262). Table S3 Influencing factors of 30-day in-hospital mortality using univariate regression analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, P., Guo, Qq., Wang, Fx. et al. Nonlinear relationship between platelet count and 30-day in-hospital mortality in ICU acute respiratory failure patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Eur J Med Res 29, 312 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-024-01909-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-024-01909-1

Keywords

European Journal of Medical Research

ISSN: 2047-783X

Contact us