Open Access

Relationship between GNAS1 T393C polymorphism and aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty

  • Patrick Stelmach1,
  • Max D. Kauther2,
  • Lena Fuest1, 2,
  • Gina Kurscheid1, 2,
  • Thorsten Gehrke3,
  • Stefanie Klenke1, 4,
  • Marcus Jäger2,
  • Christian Wedemeyer2 and
  • Hagen S. Bachmann1, 5Email author
Contributed equally
European Journal of Medical Research201722:29

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0271-z

Received: 26 April 2017

Accepted: 18 August 2017

Published: 23 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Aseptic loosening is a main cause for revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and there is no reliable marker for the early detection of patients at high risk. This study has been performed to validate association of the T393C polymorphism (rs7121) in the GNAS1 gene, encoding for the alpha-subunit of heterotrimeric G-protein Gs, with risk for and time to aseptic loosening after THA, which has been demonstrated in our previous study.

Methods

231 patients with primary THA and 234 patients suffering from aseptic loosening were genotyped for dependency on GNAS1 genotypes and analyzed.

Results

Genotyping revealed almost similar minor allele frequencies of 0.49 and 0.46, respectively. Consistently, genotype distributions of both groups were not significantly different (p = 0.572). Neither gender nor GNAS1 genotype showed a statistically significant association with time to loosening (p = 0.501 and p = 0.840). Stratification by gender, as performed in our previous study, was not able to show a significant genotype-dependent difference in time (female p = 0.313; male p = 0.584) as well as median time to aseptic loosening (female p = 0.353; male p = 0.868).

Conclusion

This study was not able to confirm the results of our preliminary study. An association of the GNAS1 T393C polymorphisms with risk for and time to aseptic loosening after THA is unlikely.

Keywords

GNAS1 T393CPolymorphismAseptic loosening

Background

The number of total hip arthroplasties (THA) will increase noticeably in the next years. For 2030, Kurtz et al. predicted a demand of about 600,000 THA in the United States [1]. Unfortunately, revision surgery after THA is often needed due to instability, infection as well as aseptic loosening [2]. This leads to a predicted doubling of the number of revision surgeries after THA by the year 2026 [1]. The identification of risk factors influencing time to aseptic loosening may result in a better outcome of patients with THA by application of specific prophylactic treatments prior or subsequent to surgery and may therefore attenuate the number of revisions and the predicted increasing financial burdens [3].

Over the last years, research focused mainly on the identification of clinical risk factors such as gender, body-mass-index (BMI), and age [46]. But some studies investigating the impact of genetic host factors on aseptic loosening have also been published [7, 8].

The GNAS1 gene is located on chromosome 20q13.3 and encodes for the alpha-subunit of the heterotrimeric G-protein complex Gs. This G-protein complex interacts with G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and is an important molecular bottleneck in signal transduction pathways by increasing cellular second messenger cAMP level [9, 10]. Different studies demonstrated that Gαs alterations are causative for several bone diseases. The autosomal dominant disorder Albright’s hereditary osteodystrophy with reduced expression or function of Gαs leads to brachydactyly, short stature, and subcutaneous ossifications [11]. In McCune–Albright syndrome, an activating mutation of the GNAS1 gene results in polyostotic fibrous dysplasia [12, 13]. Downregulation of GNAS1 gene expression in osteoclasts by the antiretroviral drug tenofovir resulted in osteoclast dysfunction and clinical relevant bone density loss [14].

Exon 5 of the GNAS1 gene harbors the common silent polymorphism T393C (rs7121) which was first characterized by Jia et al. [15]. They revealed a significant impact of this polymorphism on sympathetic signal transduction which was confirmed in further studies [1618]. Furthermore, associations of this polymorphism with the course of other diseases, e.g., schizophrenia and different types of cancer have been reported [1923]. However, other studies failed to show significant associations of this polymorphism [24, 25].

Recently, we investigated for the first time putative effects of the GNAS1 T393C polymorphism on early aseptic loosening in a study comprising 57 patients after total hip arthroplasty [26]. There was no significant association between time and median time to aseptic loosening and GNAS1 T393C genotypes. However, further analysis corrected for gender revealed that time to aseptic loosening was significantly longer in male patients. Therefore, additional analysis to investigate the effect of the GNAS1 T393C polymorphism was performed and corrected for gender. The CC genotype was associated with significantly longer time and median time to aseptic loosening in male patients. In female patients, results were not completely consistent, but there was evidence that in contrast to male patients the TT genotype was associated with longer time and median time to aseptic loosening.

To date, no further analyses have been performed to validate these findings in independent studies. Therefore, we used a recently established independent cohort comprising 234 patients suffering from aseptic loosening and 231 patients with primary THA to prove the putative association of the GNAS1 T393C polymorphism with aseptic loosening [27].

Methods

Patients

Our retrospective case–control study included 465 Western European patients of German ancestry operated at the Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Germany [27]. The control group consisted of 231 patients with primary THA without aseptic loosening and the case group consisted of 234 patients suffering from aseptic loosening after THA. Control and aseptic loosening patients were consecutively enrolled at the time of primary THA and revision surgery, respectively. The following inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined: inclusion criterion for the control group was primary THA due to primary osteoarthritis. Inclusion criteria for the case group were clinical, radiological, and intra-surgical diagnosis of aseptic loosening after THA due to primary osteoarthritis. Exclusion criteria for the case group were inflammatory diseases, treatment with immunosuppressant agents, traumatic loosening, any deep infection or the suspicion of implant infection. Exclusion of infection was carried out by microbiological swab analysis. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Essen and performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients on enrollment.

Determination of GNAS1 T393C genotypes

DNA was obtained from whole blood or buccal swab using the QIAamp DNA blood mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocols. Genotypes of the T393C polymorphism (rs7121) were determined by PCR and restriction fragment length analysis as previously described [26]. Forward primer 5′-TGTGGCCGCCATGAGCAA-3′ and reverse primer 5′-TAAGGCCACACAAGTCGGGGT-3′ were used with the following PCR conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C, followed by 38 cycles of DNA amplification at 94 °C for 45 s, 62 °C for 40 s, and 72 °C for 45 s. The obtained 145-bp PCR products were digested by BseGI (Fermentas, Germany) and separated on a 2.5% agarose gel. Completely restricted products of 73 and 72 bp represented the CC genotype and unrestricted products of 145 bp the TT genotype.

Statistical analysis

We used the log-rank test and Kaplan–Meier plots to evaluate retrospectively the relationship between GNAS1 genotypes, gender and time to loosening. The nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test was performed in order to relate the median time to loosening to gender as well as genotype. The impact of age, BMI, and GNAS1 T393C genotype as prognostic factors for time to aseptic loosening were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. From these Cox regression models, hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI were calculated. For linear comparison of nonparametric variables, we performed a Jonckheere–Terpsta test. Continuous variables were compared by ANOVA and categorical variables using GNAS1 genotypes were compared by contingency tables and Pearson’s χ 2 test. Differences were regarded as significant at p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). A public domain program was used to control for deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium [28]. Power was calculated using the publically available software PS 3.1.2 [29, 30].

Results

GNAS1 T393C genotype and clinical characteristics

Clinical characteristics and genotype distribution in patients with primary THA and patients with aseptic loosening are given in Table 1. Age at implantation and replantation, BMI, gender, first stem with or without cement, and first cup with or without cement are listed. The GNAS1 T393C genotype distribution of the 231 patients with primary THA was TT in 52 patients, TC in 122 patients, and CC in 57 patients. GNAS1 T393C genotype distribution in 234 patients suffering from aseptic loosening after THA was 44 TT genotype carriers, 126 heterozygous patients and 64 carried the CC genotype. Both genotype distributions were not significantly different from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (primary THA: p = 0.388; aseptic loosening: p = 0.194). The genotype distribution was neither significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.572) nor to another already published control group consisted of 820 healthy German individuals of Caucasian ancestry (p = 0.389) [31]. Furthermore, the analysis of the clinical characteristics gender, age at enrollment, and BMI showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (Primary THA, age at implantation: 64.54 ± 10.9 years vs. aseptic loosening, age at replantation: 65.34 ± 12.4 years, p = 0.461; primary THA, BMI: 27.31 ± 4.5 kg/m2 vs. aseptic loosening: 26.94 ± 5.9 kg/m2, p = 0.448; primary THA, gender: 65.4% female vs. aseptic loosening: 70.5% female, p = 0.235). We analyzed whether there was a correlation of these clinical variables of the control and the study group with GNAS1 T393C genotype. However, no statistically significant correlation was found (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics and genotype distribution in patients with primary THA and patients with aseptic loosening

 

All

GNAS1 T393C genotype

p value

TT

TC

CC

Primary THA

 n (%)

231

52 (22.5)

122 (52.8)

57 (24.7)

 

 Age at implantation (years)

64.54 ± 10.9

62.12 ± 11.3

65.77 ± 10.0

64.12 ± 12.0

0.136

Gender

 Female (%)

151 (65.4)

39 (25.8)

80 (53.0)

32 (21.2)

0.118

 Male (%)

80 (34.6)

13 (16.3)

42 (52.5)

25 (31.3)

 BMI (kg/m2)

27.31 ± 4.5

26.95 ± 4.6

27.64 ± 4.3

27.00 ± 4.9

0.556

Aseptic loosening

 n (%)

234

44 (18.8)

126 (53.8)

64 (27.4)

 

 Age at implantation (years)

52.80 ± 12.8

51.44 ± 13.6

53.08 ± 13.1

53.22 ± 11.6

0.735

 Age at replantation (years)

65.34 ± 12.4

63.20 ± 12.6

65.53 ± 12.7

66.46 ± 11.9

0.399

Gender

 Female (%)

165 (70.5)

31 (18.8)

87 (52.7)

47 (28.5)

0.821

 Male (%)

69 (29.5)

13 (18.8)

39 (56.5)

17 (24.6)

 BMI (kg/m2)

26.94 ± 5.9

27.15 ± 4.8

27.13 ± 7.0

26.45 ± 3.9

0.734

First cup with cement (n = 212)

 No

73 (34.4)

15 (20.5)

37 (50.7)

21 (28.8)

0.749

 Yes

139 (65.6)

26 (18.7)

78 (56.1)

35 (25.2)

First stem with cement (n = 213)

 No

75 (35.2)

14 (18.7)

42 (56.0)

19 (25.3)

0.946

 Yes

138 (64.8)

27 (19.6)

74 (53.6)

37 (26.8)

Data are numbers with percentages given in brackets and numbers with standard deviation, respectively. Categorical variables were analyzed by χ 2 statistics. p values were calculated using ANOVA for continuous variables

GNAS1 T393C genotype and time to aseptic loosening

In our previous study, a gender-dependent association of GNAS1 T393C polymorphism with aseptic loosening was found. Therefore, time and median time to aseptic loosening were analyzed for correlation with GNAS1 T393C genotype and gender using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Kruskal–Wallis test in this study (Fig. 1; Table 2). Time and median time to aseptic loosening after THA were neither significantly associated with GNAS1 T393C genotype nor with gender (Fig. 1a, b; Table 2). Median time to aseptic loosening was 142 months (range 1–431) for all 234 patients, for GNAS1 T393C TT homozygous patients 134.5 months (range 1–405), for GNAS1 T393C CC homozygous patients 141.5 months (range 2–397) and for GNAS1 T393C TC heterozygous patients 144 months (range 1–431). Median time to aseptic loosening was 152 months (range 1–431) for female patients and 132 months (range 3–396) for male patients.
Fig. 1

Time to aseptic loosening depending on GNAS1 T393C genotype and gender. Time to aseptic loosening based on Kaplan–Meier-curves for 234 patients with aseptic loosening. a Patients based on GNAS1 T393C TT, TC and CC genotype. b Patients based on gender

Table 2

Median time to aseptic loosening according to gender and GNAS1 genotype

 

All

Gender

p value

Female

Male

n (%)

234

165 (70.5)

69 (29.5)

 

MTAL, months (range)

142 (1–431)

152 (1–431)

132 (3–396)

0.576

 

All

GNAS1 T393C genotype

p value

TT

TC

CC

n (%)

234

44 (18.8)

126 (53.8)

64 (27.4)

 

MTAL, months (range)

142 (1–431)

134.5 (1–405)

144 (1–431)

141.5 (2–397)

0.667

Female

 n (%)

165

31 (18.8)

87 (52.7)

47 (28.5)

 

 MTAL, months (range)

152 (1–431)

137 (1–405)

159 (1–431)

173 (2–397)

0.353*

Male

 n (%)

69

13 (18.8)

39 (56.5)

17 (24.6)

 

 MTAL, months (range)

132 (3–396)

128 (27–354)

144 (3–396)

108 (12–304)

0.868

Data are numbers with percentages given in brackets and medians with ranges given in brackets, respectively. p values were calculated using Kruskal–Wallis test for nonparametric variables. *Jonckheere–Terpstra test for linear comparison of nonparametric variables p = 0.160

MTAL median time to aseptic loosening

Next we investigated the putative correlation between GNAS1 T393C genotypes and aseptic loosening stratified by gender. No significant correlation between time (p = 0.313 for females and p = 0.584 for males) as well as median time (p = 0.353 for females and p = 0.868 for males) to aseptic loosening and GNAS1 T393C genotype could be detected for males or females (Fig. 2a, b; Table 2). In our previous study, all 57 patients suffered from early aseptic loosening within 10 years after THA. Therefore, in a third step, only female and male patients with aseptic loosening within 10 years after THA were analyzed. However, no statistically significant correlation between time (p = 0.864 for females and p = 0.991 for males) to aseptic loosening and GNAS1 T393C genotype could be detected (Fig. 2c, d). Under the assumption of expected hazard ratios comparable to those of our preliminary study [26], power analysis revealed a power of at least 80% for these tests.
Fig. 2

Time to aseptic loosening depending on GNAS1 T393C genotype stratified by gender. Time to aseptic loosening based on Kaplan–Meier curves for 165 female and 69 male patients, respectively. a, b All female and male patients, based on GNAS1 T393C genotype. c, d Female and male patients with aseptic loosening within 10 years after THA based on GNAS1 T393C genotype

In line with the results from Kaplan–Meier curves and Kruskal–Wallis test, female and male patients showed no significant differences in time to aseptic loosening between single genotypes despite correcting for the variables age and BMI in univariate and also in multivariate analysis (Table 3).
Table 3

Factors influencing the time to aseptic loosening by univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analysis

Variable

Multivariate analysis

All

Female

Male

p*

p

HR

95% CI

p*

p

HR

95% CI

p*

p

HR

95% CI

T393C

 TT

  

1a

   

1a

   

1a

 

 TC

0.648

0.427

0.868

0.61–1.23

0.166

0.079

0.685

0.45–1.05

0.354

0.329

1.407

0.71–2.79

 CC

0.564

0.342

0.828

0.56–1.22

0.172

0.124

0.695

0.44–1.11

0.344

0.572

1.245

0.58–2.66

 Age

<0.001

<0.001

1.037

1.02–1.05

<0.001

<0.001

1.036

1.02–1.05

0.003

0.002

1.039

1.01–1.06

 BMI

0.158

0.030

1.020

1.00–1.04

0.286

0.068

1.018

0.99–1.04

0.192

0.176

1.051

0.98–1.13

* Univariate analysis

aReference group

Discussion

Aseptic loosening is a common problem after THA and will cause increased financial burdens in the next years [3]. Unfortunately, the number of replacements in each individual patient is limited [32]. Therefore, replacement due to aseptic loosening is a clinically relevant problem. Thus, the identification of a prognostic marker of aseptic loosening would be very useful. Patients at high risk for aseptic loosening after THA could be identified before surgery and might benefit for example from pronounced weight reduction or special prophylactic treatments. The advantages of a genetic host factor as a prognostic marker would be an easy determination, realizable prior to surgery. In recent years, some promising polymorphism in different genes such as the Matrix metalloprotease 1 [33], the Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase 1 [34], or BCL2 [27] were identified and their impact on risk for and time to aseptic loosening were investigated. Despite significant associations of these polymorphisms with risk for and time to aseptic loosening, up to date, none of these polymorphisms is determined routinely. In this study, we investigated the impact of the single-nucleotide polymorphism T393C in the GNAS1 gene locus on time and median time to aseptic loosening. Time and median time to aseptic loosening after THA were neither significantly associated with GNAS1 T393C genotypes nor with gender. Stratification by gender revealed no significant association with GNAS1 T393C genotypes. These results are obviously not in line with the results of our previous study which revealed a significant gender-dependent association with aseptic loosening after THA and after stratification by gender a significant association of GNAS1 T393C polymorphism with aseptic loosening after THA [26].

The previous study was preliminary because of the limited number of participants comprising only 57 patients suffering from aseptic loosening. Therefore, we used a recently established cohort to perform this independent replication study. Comparison of hazard ratio 95% confidence intervals of both studies shows overlapping intervals indicating that results do not exclude each other. Furthermore, we can assume that both cohorts might belong to the same basic population and no fulminant structural bias was apparent in one of our studies. Because this study was sufficiently powered to falsify the previous results, we assume a type I error led to the significant findings of our previous study. Nevertheless, it cannot be completely ruled out that in an even larger study population a significant effect could be demonstrated. But due to our results this effect would be small and the question remains if such a weak association is good enough to be useful as a prognostic clinical marker. Furthermore, it should be mentioned that also other known or unknown risk factors, e.g., the type of implants that have been used, the quality of the cement technique and the surgical experience may act as potentially influencing factors on time to aseptic loosening. In future studies, these factors should be considered in order to exclude additional potential confounders. However, if it would be possible to verify a couple of genetic markers, each with a small impact, development of genetic host factor panels might be an option to personalize the treatment in future. Finally, despite the identification of some polymorphisms in different genes and their association to risk for and time to aseptic loosening [27, 33, 34], other, not yet identified polymorphisms may have an even stronger effect on aseptic loosening. Therefore, we are convinced that further research on genetic host factors is a promising tool to discover new prognostic markers in aseptic loosening after THA.

Conclusion

Our study emphasized that an association of the polymorphism T393C located in the GNAS1 gene locus with risk for and time to aseptic loosening is unlikely. Further independent and prospective studies should be undertaken to rule out the outstanding (genetic) key reasons for aseptic loosening after THA. Yet unstudied polymorphisms might play a major role in the pathogenesis of aseptic loosening.

Notes

Abbreviations

THA: 

total hip arthroplasty

BMI: 

body-mass-index

GPCRs: 

G-protein-coupled receptors

cAMP: 

cyclic adenosine monophosphate

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CW, TG, MJ, MDK, HSB. Performed the experiments: PS, LF, GK, SK, HSB. Analyzed the data: PS, CW, LF, MDK, HSB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TG, MJ, HSB. Wrote the paper: PS, MDK, SK, HSB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusion of this article is included within the article (Figs. 1, 2; Tables 1, 2, 3).

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients on enrollment.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Essen and performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients on enrollment.

Funding

The study was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG), Bonn, Germany (WE3634/1-2).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Pharmacogenetics, University Hospital Essen
(2)
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Essen
(3)
Department of Joint Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik
(4)
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Essen
(5)
Department of Health, School of Medicine, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Center for Biomedical Education and Research (ZBAF), Witten/Herdecke University

References

  1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2007;89:780–5.Google Scholar
  2. Dobzyniak M, Fehring TK, Odum S. Early failure in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:76–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Mowat F, Saleh K, Dybvik E, Karrholm J, Garellick G, Havelin LI, Furnes O, et al. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2007;89(Suppl 3):144–51.Google Scholar
  4. Wendelboe AM, Hegmann KT, Biggs JJ, Cox CM, Portmann AJ, Gildea JH, Gren LH, Lyon JL. Relationships between body mass indices and surgical replacements of knee and hip joints. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:290–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Flugsrud GB, Nordsletten L, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Meyer HE. The effect of middle-age body weight and physical activity on the risk of early revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 1,535 individuals. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:99–107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dy CJ, Bozic KJ, Pan TJ, Wright TM, Padgett DE, Lyman S. Risk factors for early revision after total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66:907–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Del Buono A, Denaro V, Maffulli N. Genetic susceptibility to aseptic loosening following total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2012;101:39–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wedemeyer C, Kauther MD, Hanenkamp S, Nuckel H, Bau M, Siffert W, Bachmann HS. BCL2-938C>A and CALCA-1786T>C polymorphisms in aseptic loosened total hip arthroplasty. Eur J Med Res. 2009;14:250–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Puzhko S, Goodyer CG, Kerachian MA, Canaff L, Misra M, Juppner H, Bastepe M, Hendy GN. Parathyroid hormone signaling via Galphas is selectively inhibited by an NH(2)-terminally truncated Galphas: implications for pseudohypoparathyroidism. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:2473–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Klenke S, Siffert W. SNPs in genes encoding G proteins in pharmacogenetics. Pharmacogenomics. 2011;12:633–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Patten JL, Johns DR, Valle D, Eil C, Gruppuso PA, Steele G, Smallwood PM, Levine MA. Mutation in the gene encoding the stimulatory G protein of adenylate cyclase in Albright’s hereditary osteodystrophy. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1412–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Weinstein LS, Shenker A, Gejman PV, Merino MJ, Friedman E, Spiegel AM. Activating mutations of the stimulatory G protein in the McCune–Albright syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1688–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Schwindinger WF, Francomano CA, Levine MA. Identification of a mutation in the gene encoding the alpha subunit of the stimulatory G protein of adenylyl cyclase in McCune–Albright syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5152–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Grigsby IF, Pham L, Gopalakrishnan R, Mansky LM, Mansky KC. Downregulation of Gnas, Got2 and Snord32a following tenofovir exposure of primary osteoclasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;391:1324–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jia H, Hingorani AD, Sharma P, Hopper R, Dickerson C, Trutwein D, Lloyd DD, Brown MJ. Association of the G(s)alpha gene with essential hypertension and response to beta-blockade. Hypertension. 1999;34:8–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bachmann HS, Lieb B, Bonnet U, Specka M, Augener S, Siffert W, Scherbaum N. Influence of the 393T>C polymorphism of the GNAS1 gene on the intensity of opiate withdrawal. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2011;44:159–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lelonek M, Pietrucha T, Matyjaszczyk M, Goch JH. Mutation T/C, Ile 131 of the gene encoding the alfa subunit of the human Gs protein and predisposition to vasovagal syncope. Circ J. 2008;72:558–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Oterino A, Ruiz-Alegria C, Castillo J, Valle N, Bravo Y, Cayon A, Alonso A, Tejera P, Ruiz-Lavilla N, Munoz P, Pascual J. GNAS1 T393C polymorphism is associated with migraine. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:429–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Frey UH, Eisenhardt A, Lummen G, Rubben H, Jockel KH, Schmid KW, Siffert W. The T393C polymorphism of the G alpha s gene (GNAS1) is a novel prognostic marker in bladder cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2005;14:871–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Frey UH, Lummen G, Jager T, Jockel KH, Schmid KW, Rubben H, Muller N, Siffert W, Eisenhardt A. The GNAS1 T393C polymorphism predicts survival in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:759–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Frey UH, Alakus H, Wohlschlaeger J, Schmitz KJ, Winde G, van Calker HG, Jockel KH, Siffert W, Schmid KW. GNAS1 T393C polymorphism and survival in patients with sporadic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:5071–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Otterbach F, Callies R, Frey UH, Schmitz KJ, Wreczycki C, Kimmig R, Siffert W, Schmid KW. The T393C polymorphism in the gene GNAS1 of G protein is associated with survival of patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;105:311–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Minoretti P, Politi P, Coen E, Di Vito C, Bertona M, Bianchi M, Emanuele E. The T393C polymorphism of the GNAS1 gene is associated with deficit schizophrenia in an Italian population sample. Neurosci Lett. 2006;397:159–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. El Hindy N, Lambertz N, Bachmann HS, Frey UH, Adamzik M, Zhu Y, Sure U, Siffert W, Sandalcioglu IE. Role of the GNAS1 T393C polymorphism in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18:1495–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zill P, Baghai TC, Zwanzger P, Schule C, Minov C, Behrens S, Rupprecht R, Moller HJ, Engel R, Bondy B. Association analysis of a polymorphism in the G-protein stimulatory alpha subunit in patients with major depression. Am J Med Genet. 2002;114:530–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bachmann HS, Hanenkamp S, Kornacki B, Frey UH, Bau M, Siffert W, Wedemeyer C. Gender-dependent association of the GNAS1 T393C polymorphism with early aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1562–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stelmach P, Wedemeyer C, Fuest L, Kurscheid G, Gehrke T, Klenke S, Jager M, Kauther MD, Bachmann HS. The BCL2-938C>A promoter polymorphism is associated with risk for and time to aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0149528.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodriguez S, Gaunt TR, Day IN. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium testing of biological ascertainment for Mendelian randomization studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169:505–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr. Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:589–601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990;11:116–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Alakus H, Monig SP, Warnecke-Eberz U, Alakus G, Winde G, Drebber U, Schmitz KJ, Schmid KW, Riemann K, Siffert W, et al. Association of the GNAS1 T393C polymorphism with tumor stage and survival in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:6061–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Harris WH, Poss R, Baron JA. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2003;85-a:27–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Yan Y, Hu J, Lu H, Wang W. Genetic susceptibility to total hip arthroplasty failure: a case–control study on the influence of MMP 1 gene polymorphism. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9:177.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Pan F, Hua S, Luo Y, Yin D, Ma Z. Genetic susceptibility of early aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty: the influence of TIMP-1 gene polymorphism on Chinese Han population. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:108.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement