Skip to main content
Download PDF

Associations between facet tropism and vertebral rotation in patients with degenerative lumbar disease

European Journal of Medical Research volume 26, Article number: 149 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Vertebral rotation and facet tropism are very common in various lumbar degenerative diseases. Facet tropism means the presence of asymmetric angles on both sides of the facet joints. Studies have shown that facet tropism contributes to lumbar degenerative disease, and also inevitably leads to the asymmetry of movement and the imbalance of force, which may be possible to rotate the vertebral body. The aim of this study was to explore the correlation between lumbar vertebral rotation and facet tropism in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases.

Methods

A total of 198 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases from 2018 to 2019 were enrolled. Five hundred and seventy vertebral rotation angles and 1140 facet angles were measured. The vertebral bodies are divided into non-rotation group (Group A) and rotation group (Group B) with the vertebral rotation angle of 3° as the boundary. The information including gender, age, BMI (body mass index), bone mineral density, history of smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, diagnosis, segment distribution, and degree of facet degeneration were also counted. Using inter-class correlation coefficients (ICC) to test the reliability of measurement results. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the relationship between vertebral rotation and facet tropism.

Results

The consistency of the ICC within the groups of the observers is above 0.8, with good agreement. The results of univariate analysis showed that facet tropism was significantly different between group A and group B (OR (odds ratio)  = 3.30, 95% CI  =  2.03–5.35, P  < 0.0001). Other significant factors were included as adjustment variables into the multivariate regression model. Three models were analyzed separately (Model 1: non-adjusted. Model 2: adjust for age; facet degeneration; Model 3: adjust for age; disease distribution; segment distribution; facet degeneration). The results showed that after adjusting the confounders, the correlation between facet tropism and vertebral rotation did not change (Model 1: OR  = 3.30, 95% CI  = 2.03–5.35, P  < 0.0001; Model 2: adjusted OR  = 2.87, 95% CI  = 1.66–4.97, P  = 0.0002, Model 3: adjusted OR  = 2.84, 95% CI  = 1.56–5.17, P  = 0.0006).

Conclusion

Current research demonstrates that there is an association between vertebral rotation and facet tropism, suggesting that vertebral rotation may also have a certain degree of correlation with lumbar degenerative diseases.

Background

Lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) is a series of diseases caused by degenerative changes in the lumbar spine [1]. It is a high-incidence disease among middle-aged and elderly people and seriously affects the quality of life [2, 3]. In recent years, with the increase of people’s life pressure and the aging process of the social population, the incidence of LDD is gradually increasing and showing a younger trend [4]. Among the many risk factors of LDD, facet tropism (FT) has been considered to be related to LDD such as low back pain, facet joint osteoarthritis, lumbar disc degeneration, recurrence of lumbar disc herniation, degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, and paravertebral muscle asymmetry [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. FT means the asymmetric angles on both sides of the facet joints [11]. The feature of FT is that one facet is closer to the sagittal position than the other [7]. Although this is considered a normal feature of the thoracic spine, the more obvious asymmetry of the facet in the lumbar is considered to be the possible cause of the abnormal load pattern, which may eventually lead to pathological results [6, 12]. According to these studies, FT is an important risk factor for lumbar degenerative diseases.

Vertebral rotation (VR) is also a common phenomenon in LDD, especially in lumbar degenerative scoliosis. Studies have shown that the facet joints can limit the rotation of the vertebral body [13]. The asymmetry of the facet on both sides will inevitably lead to the asymmetry of movement and the imbalance of force [14], which may be possible to rotate the vertebral body. Similarly, the rotation of the vertebral body will also act on the facet joints on both sides. But there is no research on the relationship between VR and FT. The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation between vertebral rotation and facet tropism. This study may provide some insight into whether vertebral rotation has an impact on lumbar degenerative diseases.

Materials and methods

Study population

The subjects were selected from patients with LDD in our hospital from 2018 to 2019. Inclusion criteria: 1. admission to the hospital for LDD, including disc herniation, spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis; 2. with complete lumbar CT imaging data; 3. scanning plane parallel to the vertebral endplate; 4. no history of lumbar trauma or surgery. Exclusion criteria: 1. the degree of facet degeneration greater than III, which affects the measurement; 2. bone destruction such as fractures, tuberculosis or tumors; 3. vertebral deformities, lamina subfissure or other developmental abnormalities. According to related research [15], the vertebral bodies were divided into non-rotation group (Group A) and rotation group (Group B) with the boundary of 3° of vertebral rotation angle. The baseline information of the two groups of patients is shown in Table 1. The demographic information of each patient, including age, gender, and BMI (body mass index) are counted. The computed tomography (CT) image of the lumbar spine was used to measure the rotation angle and facet angle.

Table 1 Basic information of patients
Full size table

Measurements

CT can show bone structure more clearly and provide accurate anatomical location [16]. Therefore, the measurement was done on the CT image. The images were randomly mixed with hidden patient information and numbered to ensure independent evaluation of the data by the observers using a blind method. Three experienced spine surgeons underwent one hour training before the start of the study. Each data was measured twice by three surgeons separately with an interval of 4 weeks to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer agreement, ensuring the accuracy of data acquired. The upper endplate layer of the vertebral body was selected for the layer of measurement. Because this level can better display the facet joint and reduce errors [17]. The Aaro-Dahlborn method [18] was used to measure the rotation angle of the vertebral body (Fig. 1a). Facet angle is the angle subtended by the plane of the facet with the sagittal plane in the midline of the vertebral body (Fig. 1b). The differences of facet angles were divided into four groups for analysis based on the quartile:  < 2.3° (Q1), 2.3°–4.6° (Q2), 4.6°–8.5° (Q3),  ≥ 8.5° (Q4) (Fig. 2). Facet degeneration is divided into 4 grades according to the standard of Patllria et al. [19]: I normal, II mild degeneration, III moderate degeneration, IV severe degeneration (Table 2). Surgimap 2.3 (Nemaris Inc., New York, NY, USA) was used for measuring.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a The rotation angle is the angle between the midline of the vertebral body and the sagittal line. b The angle subtended by the plane of the facet with the sagittal plane in the midline of the vertebral body is the facet angle. c Diagram shows the measurement of rotation angle of L2 vertebral body and facet angle of L1/2 segment

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Examples of the four groups of facet angle differences

Full size image
Table 2 Grading of facet joint osteoarthritis (FJO)
Full size table

Statistical analyses

The inter-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for the evaluation of the inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility. ICC greater than 0.9 indicates good consistency. Variables with p value <  0.20 were included in the multivariable logistic regression for controlling the possible effect of confounders. P  < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Empower Stats and R software (R version 3.6.1) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 570 vertebral rotation angles and 1140 facet angles from 198 patients were included and measured. There are 311 vertebral bodies and 622 facets in Group A (49.8% were from males and 50.2% were from females). 259 vertebral bodies and 518 facets in Group B (48.7% were from males and 51.3% were from females) (Table 1). ICC between and within the observers were above 0.9, with good consistency, demonstrating the reliability of the measurement results and the repeatability of the measurement method.

In this study, basic information including age, gender, BMI, bone mineral density, drinking, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, segmental distribution, diseases distribution, and grading of facet degeneration were included in the univariate analysis. The results showed that facet tropism was significantly related to vertebral rotation (OR  = 3.30, 95% CI  = 2.03, 5.35, P  < 0.0001). There were also differences in age, facet degeneration, segment distribution, and disease distribution between the two groups (Table 3).

Table 3 Univariate regression analysis of vertebral rotation
Full size table

According to the results of univariate regression analysis, we focused on the influence of facet tropism on vertebral rotation, and the remaining factors with P value  < 0.20 were included as adjustment variables into the multivariate regression model. Three models were established (Model 1: did not adjust for any confounding factors, Model 2: adjusted age and facet degeneration, and Model 3: further adjusted segment and disease distribution). The results showed that after adjusting for the confounders, the correlation between facet tropism and vertebral rotation did not change (Model 1: OR (95% CI)  = 3.30 (2.03, 5.35), P  < 0.0001, Model 2: adjusted OR (95% CI)  = 2.87 (1.66, 4.97), P  = 0.0002, Model 3: adjusted OR (95% CI)  = 2.84 (1.56, 5.17), P  = 0.0006). As the degree of asymmetry increases, the ratio of vertebral rotation also increases significantly (Table 4). In the generalized additive model (GAM), a nonlinear relationship between vertebral rotation and the degree of facet tropism was found (Fig. 3).

Table 4 Multivariate regression analysis
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

The relationship between vertebral rotation and facet tropism. The middle solid arc represents the smooth fitting curve between the variables. The dotted lines on both sides represent the 95% confidence interval of the fitted curve. Adjusted for age, facet degeneration grade, segment distribution and disease distribution

Full size image

Discussion

The facet joint is a synovial joint surrounded by cartilage and joint capsule. The bilateral facet joints and intervertebral disc constitute three-joint complex, which are the basic movement unit of the lumbar spine. Although normal discs allow movement in all planes, facet joints are naturally limited by their geometric structure and cystic attachment. The facet joints have shown a progressively more coronal orientation from the proximal end to the distal [20]. The orientation of the lumbar facet joints allows a larger range of flexion movements, but at the same time can prevent large rotational instabilities. When the vertebral body tries to rotate axially, the adjacent facet can effectively lock together [21]. This mechanism is believed to protect the vertebral body from excessive rotation and maintain stability [22].

According to the anatomical relationship, the rotation of the vertebral body inevitably acts on the facet on both sides, causing changes in stress. The finite element analysis conducted by Zeng et al. [23] showed that the rotation range of the vertebral body increased after the facet joint was removed, which clearly indicated that the facet joint has the effect of restricting rotation. Zheng et al. [24] simulated the flexion, extension, lateral curvature and rotation of the spine in a finite element analysis, and found that the stress concentration of facet joint was the most obvious in the case of rotation. These studies show that there is an interaction between the facet and vertebral body.

Facet tropism is a common phenomenon in the spine, which means that the angles of the facet on both sides are different. Mohanty et al. [20] analyzed the facet angles of 566 normal vertebral bodies. The incidence of facet tropism ranged from 22.42 to 47.82%. Biomechanics studies have increased the understanding of the face tropism. Kim et al. [25] conducted a finite element model analysis of 3 different facet orientations (50°, 55° and 60° relative to the coronal plane) and 1 facet tropism (50° on the right side and 60° on the left). The results showed that there is no difference in the pressure gradient of the intervertebral disc between the different facet orientation models. However, in the facet tropism model, the pressure on the disc and facet joint increased the most, indicating that the facet tropism is more susceptible to external forces or shear forces. And the asymmetry of the facet will cause the vertebral body to receive greater shearing force during the rotation process. But the relationship between vertebral rotation and facet tropism has not been studied yet. In this study, by measuring 570 vertebral rotation angles and 1140 facet angles, we found a correlation between them. This result is in line with the anatomical characteristics of the vertebral body and previous related studies. But the causal relationship between them needs to be confirmed by long-term clinical studies, and maybe they influence and promote each other.

Masharawi et al. [26] analyzed 4080 vertebrae from T1 to L5 in 240 normal adults, and concluded that the asymmetry of the thoracic facet joints is normal, but it has a certain correlation with the pathological changes in the lumbar spine. Weinberg et al. [27] obtained 599 cadaveric lumbar spines from the Hamann–Todd osteological collection. They found that the average facet tropism increased from rostrally to caudally from 6.1 ± 5.5 degrees at T12–L1 to 11.2 ± 8.6 degrees at L5–S1. And they suggested that facet joints do possess the ability to remodel over time, perhaps in response to perturbations of sagittal balance, osteophyte formation, or other yet to be determined factors. Up to now, there are many reports of facet tropism in the study of disc herniation, degenerative spondylolisthesis, low back pain, ligamentum flavum thickness and other lumbar degenerative diseases [7, 10, 20, 21, 28,29,30,31,32,33]. Therefore, vertebral rotation may also be related to degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine to a certain extent.

This study has some limitations. First, according to research, the observation of the facet should be done within a period of time, not at a point in time, because the facet joints will change over time [14, 27]. In addition, different grading standards for vertebral rotation and facet tropism may have different results.

Conclusions

Current research demonstrates that there is an association between vertebral rotation and facet tropism. This suggests that the segments of rotated vertebral body may have a higher risk of degeneration. And long-term prospective studies need to be conducted to study the causality between them.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Kaiser MG, Eck JC, Groff MW, Watters WC 3rd, Dailey AT, Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Sharan A, Wang JC, Mummaneni PV, Dhall SS, Ghogawala Z. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 1: introduction and methodology. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(1):2–6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marbacher S, Mannion AF, Burkhardt JK, Schär RT, Porchet F, Kleinstück F, Jeszenszky D, Fekete TF, Haschtmann D. Patient-rated outcomes of lumbar fusion in patients with degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: does age matter? Spine. 2016;41(10):893–900. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee WC, Park JY, Kim KH, Kuh SU, Chin DK, Kim KS, Cho YE. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in multilevel: comparison with conventional transforaminal interbody fusion. World Neurosurg. 2016;85:236–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang YG, Sun Z, Zhang Z, Liu J, Guo X. Risk factors for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation in Chinese population: a case-control study. Spine. 2009;34(25):E918-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a3c2de.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Binder DS, Nampiaparampil DE. The provocative lumbar facet joint. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009;2(1):15–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-008-9039-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalichman L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Li L, Hunter DJ. Facet orientation and tropism: associations with facet joint osteoarthritis and degeneratives. Spine. 2009;34(16):E579-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa2acb.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Karacan I, Aydin T, Sahin Z, Cidem M, Koyuncu H, Aktas I, Uludag M. Facet angles in lumbar disc herniation: their relation to anthropometric features. Spine. 2004;29(10):1132–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200405150-00016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang H, Zhou Y. Facet tropism: possible role in the pathology of lumbar disc herniation in adolescents. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;18(1):111–5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.PEDS15175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lai BH, Wu JB, Pan JH. The role of facet joint asymmetry in the recurrent lumbar disc herniation after discectomy. J Clin Orthop. 2011;14(2):207–9. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287.2011.02.039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Samartzis D, Cheung JP, Rajasekaran S, Kawaguchi Y, Acharya S, Kawakami M, Satoh S, Chen WJ, Park CK, Lee CS, Foocharoen T, Nagashima H, Kuh S, Zheng Z, Condor R, Ito M, Iwasaki M, Jeong JH, Luk KD, Prijambodo B, Rege A, Jahng TA, Luo Z, Tassanawipas W, Acharya N, Pokharel R, Shen Y, Ito T, Zhang Z, Aithala PJ, Kumar GV, Jabir RA, Basu S, Li B, Moudgil V, Goss B, Sham P, Williams R. Critical values of facet joint angulation and tropism in the development of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: an international, large-scale multicenter study by the AOSpine Asia Pacific Research Collaboration Consortium. Global Spine J. 2016;6(5):414–21. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1564417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu WB, Chen S, Fan SW, Zhao FD, Yu XJ, Hu ZJ. Facet orientation and tropism: associations with asymmetric lumbar paraspinal and psoas muscle parameters in patients with chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016;29(3):581–6. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-160661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahato NK. Facet dimensions, orientation, and symmetry at L5–S1 junction in lumbosacral transitional States. Spine. 2011;36(9):E569-573. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f6ecb2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Cahill PJ. The impact of segmental and en bloc derotation maneuvers on scoliosis correction and rib prominence in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(4):345–50. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.11.SPINE11277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fan HW, Zeng JY, Zhan XF, Zheng ZF. Time dependent changes of facet joint asymmetry in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Chin J Trauma. 2010;09:826–8. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2010.09.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hou G, Chen MJ, Rong LM, Chen YT, Chen CY. The relationship of physiological rotation of vertebral body and individual development. Chin J Clin Anat. 2011;29(03):308–10.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leone A, Guglielmi G, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Bonomo L. Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review. Radiology. 2007;245(1):62–77. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2451051359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grobler LJ, Robertson PA, Novotny JE, Pope MH. Etiology of spondylolisthesis. Assessment of the role played by lumbar facet joint morphology. Spine. 1993;18(1):80–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aaro S, Dahlborn M. Estimation of vertebral rotation and the spinal and rib cage deformity in scoliosis by computer tomography. Spine. 1981;6(5):460–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198109000-00007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pathria M, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D. Osteoarthritis of the facet joints: accuracy of oblique radiographic assessment. Radiology. 1987;164(1):227–30. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.164.1.3588910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohanty SP, Pai Kanhangad M, Kamath S, Kamath A. Morphometric study of the orientation of lumbar zygapophyseal joints in a South Indian population. J Orthop Surg. 2017;25(3):2309499017739483. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017739483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Boden SD, Riew KD, Yamaguchi K, Branch TP, Schellinger D, Wiesel SW. Orientation of the lumbar facet joints: association with degenerative disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(3):403–11. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199603000-00012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Varlotta GP, Lefkowitz TR, Schweitzer M, Errico TJ, Spivak J, Bendo JA, Rybak L. The lumbar facet joint: a review of current knowledge: part 1: anatomy, biomechanics, and grading. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(1):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0983-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeng ZL, Zhu R, Wu YC, Zuo W, Yu Y, Wang JJ, Cheng LM. Effect of graded facetectomy on lumbar biomechanics. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:7981513. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7981513.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng J, Yang YH, Lou SL, Zhang DS, Liao SH. Finite element analysis of degenerative scoliosis biomechanics. J Clin Rehabil Tissue Eng Res. 2013;17(30):5490–6. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.30.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim HJ, Chun HJ, Lee HM, Kang KT, Lee CK, Chang BS, Yeom JS. The biomechanical influence of the facet joint orientation and the facet tropism in the lumbar spine. Spine J. 2013;13(10):1301–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Masharawi Y, Rothschild B, Dar G, Peleg S, Robinson D, Been E, Hershkovitz I. Facet orientation in the thoracolumbar spine: three-dimensional anatomic and biomechanical analysis. Spine. 2004;29(16):1755–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000134575.04084.ef.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weinberg DS, Xie KK, Liu RW, Gebhart JJ, Gordon ZL. Increased pelvic incidence is associated with a more coronal facet orientation in the lower lumbar spine: a cadaveric study of 599 lumbar spines. Spine. 2016;41(19):E1138–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohanty SP, Pai Kanhangad M, Kamath S, Kamath A. Morphometric study of the orientation of lumbar zygapophyseal joints in a South Indian population. J Orthop Surg. 2017;25(3):2309499017739483. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017739483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams R, Cheung JP, Goss B, Rajasekaran S, Kawaguchi Y, Acharya S, Kawakami M, Satoh S, Chen WJ, Park CK, Lee CS, Foocharoen T, Nagashima H, Kuh S, Zheng Z, Condor R, Ito M, Iwasaki M, Jeong JH, Luk KD, Prijambodo B, Rege A, Jahng TA, Luo Z, Tassanawipas W, Acharya N, Pokharel R, Shen Y, Ito T, Zhang Z, Aithala PJ, Kumar GV, Jabir RA, Basu S, Li B, Moudgil V, Sham P, Samartzis D. An international multicenter study assessing the role of ethnicity on variation of lumbar facet joint orientation and the occurrence of degenerative spondylolisthesis in Asia Pacific: a study from the AOSpine Asia Pacific Research Collaboration Consortium. Global Spine J. 2016;6(1):35–45. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1555655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu HX, Shen Y, Shang P, Ma YX, Cheng XJ, Xu HZ. Asymmetric facet joint osteoarthritis and its relationships to facet orientation, facet tropism, and ligamentum flavum thickening. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(9):394–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827ad875.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sudhir G, Vignesh Jayabalan S, Gadde S, Venkatesh Kumar G, Karthik KK. Analysis of factors influencing ligamentum flavum thickness in lumbar spine—a radiological study of 1070 disc levels in 214 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019;182:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.04.023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rai RR, Shah Y, Shah S, Palliyil NS, Dalvie S. A radiological study of the association of facet joint tropism and facet angulation with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Neurospine. 2019;16(4):742–7. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1836232.116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Schleich C, Müller-Lutz A, Blum K, Boos J, Bittersohl B, Schmitt B, Gerß J, Matuschke F, Wittsack HJ, Antoch G, Miese F. Facet tropism and facet joint orientation: risk factors for the development of early biochemical alterations of lumbar intervertebral discs. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24(10):1761–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2016.05.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No fund was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, No.127 Changle West Road, Xi’an, 710032, Shaanxi, China

    Yachao Ma, Peipei Huang, Zhipeng Tu, Zhou Yao, Zhe Wang, Zhuojing Luo & Xueyu Hu

Authors
  1. Yachao Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peipei Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhipeng Tu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhou Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhe Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhuojing Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xueyu Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YM and XH conceived the study and study design. PH, ZT and ZY collected and evaluated the data. ZL and ZW performed data analysis, data interpretation. YM wrote the manuscript. XH revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhuojing Luo or Xueyu Hu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committees of the Air Force Medical University approved this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Y., Huang, P., Tu, Z. et al. Associations between facet tropism and vertebral rotation in patients with degenerative lumbar disease. Eur J Med Res 26, 149 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00622-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00622-7

Keywords

European Journal of Medical Research

ISSN: 2047-783X

Contact us