Skip to main content
Download PDF

Neuroprotective effects of donepezil against Aβ25-35-induced neurotoxicity

European Journal of Medical Research volume 27, Article number: 219 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the neuroprotective effect of donepezil against β-amyloid25-35 (Aβ25-35)-induced neurotoxicity and the possible mechanism.

Methods

PC12 cells were conventionally cultured. Serial concentrations of Aβ25-35 and donepezil (0, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20 and 50 μmol/L) were added to the PC12 cells, and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) staining was performed to detect the effects of these treatments on PC 12 viability. The PC 12 cells were pretreated with 1, 5, 10, 20 or 50 μmol/L donepezil two hours before 20 μmol/L Aβ25-35 was added to pretreatment groups A, B, C, D and E. Normal control group I and the 20 μmol/L Aβ25-35-treated group were selected. An MTT assay was used to detect PC12 cell viability, and the level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was determined. PC12 cells were pretreated with 10 μmol/L GF109203X (a protein kinase C [PKC] antagonist) 30 min before 10 μmol/L donepezil was added to pretreatment group F, and normal control group II, the 10 μmol/L GF109203X-treated group and the 10 μmol/L donepezil-treated group were chosen. The expression of phosphorylation-PKC (P-PKC) and its major substrate phosphorylated myristoylated alanine-rich protein C kinase substrate (P-MARCKS) was measured by Western blotting. The effects of donepezil on the subcellular distribution of the PKCα and PKCε isoforms were detected by immunofluorescence staining.

Results

Treatment with Aβ25-35 (5, 10, 20 or 50 μmol/L) for 24 h significantly (P < 0.05) decreased PC 12 cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. Compared with the PC12 cells in the control group, those in the 20 μmol/L Aβ25-35-treated group exhibited lower viability but higher LDH release. Compared with the 20 μmol/L Aβ25–35-treated group, pretreatment groups B, C, D and E exhibited significantly (P < 0.05) increased cell viability but significantly (P < 0.05) decreased LDH release. Western blotting demonstrated that compared with control, 10 μmol/L donepezil promoted PKC and MARCKS phosphorylation and that the expression of P-PKC and P-MARCKS in pretreatment group F was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that in the donepezil-treated group. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that the PKCα and PKCε isoforms were located mainly in the cytoplasm of PC12 control cells, whereas donepezil increased the expression of the PKCα and PKCε isoforms in the membrane fraction. The Western blot results showed that donepezil altered the subcellular distribution of the PKCα and PKCε isoforms by decreasing their expression in the cytosolic fraction but increasing their expression in the membrane fraction.

Conclusion

Donepezil can antagonize Aβ25–350-induced neurotoxicity in PC 12 cells, and PKC activation may account for the neuroprotective effect of donepezil.

Introduction

As a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of memory and cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia in the elderly [1, 2]. There are two pathological hallmarks of AD: extracellular deposits of amyloid-β (Aβ) protein and intracellular phosphorylated tau protein [3,4,5,6]. Abnormal extracellular deposition of the Aβ peptide results in the formation of senile plaques in the hippocampus, which is the pathological feature of AD associated with neurodegeneration [7]. The Aβ protein may trigger the hyperphosphorylation of the tau protein and cause impairment of axonal transport and destabilization of microtubules, leading to neuronal apoptosis. This neurotoxicity of the Aβ protein is one of the most important mechanisms of AD, and inhibition of the neurotoxicity of this protein is thus one approach for treating this disease. Currently, the predominant agents for treating AD are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, which can enhance cholinergic neurotransmission in the synaptic cleft by inhibiting acetylcholine degeneration [8]. As a classical inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase approved by the FDA, donepezil can provide symptomatic relief and neuroprotection against Aβ toxicity in cell and animal models [9,10,11] and halt progressive atrophy in the brains of AD patients [12]. However, the specific pharmaceutical mechanism of donepezil is not clear, especially regarding its effects on neuroprotection against exogenous Aβ; however, some research has indicated that donepezil may be able to alter the metabolism of the amyloid precursor protein, leading to decreased secretion of Aβ [13]. This study investigated the effect of donepezil on rat pheochromocytoma cells (PC 12) exposed to Aβ25-35 and the possible mechanism.

Materials and methods

Reagents

Donepezil was provided by Eisai China Inc. (Suzhou, China). Aβ25-35, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), a mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) were provided by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor GF109203X was provided by Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). A rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-PKC (P-PKC) antibody and a rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase (MARCKS) antibody were provided by Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Mouse monoclonal anti-PKCα and PKCε antibodies were provided by Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). A Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM), foetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin, streptomycin and pancreatin-EDTA (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid) mixture was provided by Gibco (Carlsbad, CA, USA). RIPA cell lysis buffer was provided by Shenneng Bocai (Shanghai, China). A BCA protein assay kit was provided by Pierce (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). An ECL Western Blotting Detection kit was provided by Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK).

Cell culture

PC12 cells were routinely plated into 100 mm culture dishes in DMEM containing 10% foetal bovine serum, 1% streptomycin and 1% penicillin. The cells were cultured in 100% humidity and 5% CO2 at 37 °C. When the cells reached 80% cell fusion, the medium was discarded, and the cells were lysed with pancreatin for passage. Cells in logarithmic growth were taken for experiments.

MTT assay

The MTT assay was used to assess cell viability. The cells were plated in a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well. Twenty-four hours later, donepezil or Aβ25-35 at 0, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20 or 50 μmol was added to the cells, with six wells for each concentration. At the same time, medium without cells was used as the blank control. Twenty-four hours after treatment, the medium was replaced, and 180 μL of medium and 20 μL of 5 g/L MTT were added to each well for further incubation for 4 h. Then, the medium was discarded, and 200 μL of DMSO was added to each well for incubation for 30 min at 37 °C. The absorption of the cells at 570 nm was evaluated and compared with that of the cells in the control group to determine the relative viability of the cells.

Effect of donepezil pretreatment on cell viability

The cells were plated at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well in a 96-well plate and were divided 24 h later into the normal control group, the Aβ25-35-treated group, and the Aβ25-35 plus 1, 5, 10, 20, or 50 μmol donepezil-treated groups. For the Aβ25-35 plus donepezil-treated groups, donepezil was added at different concentrations and then 20 μmol/L Aβ25-35 was added two hours later for further incubation for 24 h. Then, cell viability was evaluated by the MTT assay (as described above).

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release

The manufacturer’s protocol was used to assay LDH released from damaged cells. The treatment and classification of the groups were the same as those described above. The supernatant was collected from each group, and protein inhibitors were added on ice. Then, 120 μL of supernatant was transferred to an enzyme-labelling plate. After the reaction, working fluid was added and incubated for 30 min at room temperature, and the absorbance at 500 nm was measured.

Western blotting for P-PKC and P-MARCKS expression

The cells were inoculated at a density of 105 cells/mL in a 10-cm culture dish. The cells were divided into the normal control group, the donepezil-treated group, the GF109203X plus donepezil-treated group and the GF109203X-treated group. Thirty minutes after 10 μmol/L GF109203X was added to the GF109203X plus donepezil-treated group and the GF109203X-treated group, 10 μmol/L donepezil was added to the donepezil-treated group and the GF109203X plus donepezil-treated group, and an equivalent amount of solvent was added to the normal control group. After the protein concentration was measured in each group, 20 μg of protein was taken for sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel (PAGE) electrophoresis. Electrophoresis was performed at 100 v for 20 min and then at 150 v for 60 min. Then, the proteins were electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), which were saturated with 5% non-fat milk and incubated with β-actin (1:10,000), phospho-PKC (1:1000) and P-MARCKS (1:1000) primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. After washing with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) for 30 min, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit/mouse IgG secondary antibodies (1:1000) for one hour at room temperature. TBS was used to wash the membranes, and ABC compound was added at room temperature for 30 min. The signals were developed using an ECL Western Blotting Detection kit.

Immunofluorescence for PKCα and PKCε expression

The cells were inoculated at a density of 105 cells/mL in 6-well plates, and the cells were divided into the control and donepezil-treated groups. In the donepezil-treated group, 10 μmol/L donepezil was added after the cells were inoculated, while the inoculated cells of the normal group were not treated with donepezil. Two hours later, the medium was discarded, and PBS was used to wash the cells twice. Thirty minutes after 40 g/L paraformaldehyde fixation, PBS was used to wash the cells three times for 5 min each time. Then, the cells were treated with PBS containing 3% H2O2 and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 20 min at room temperature, and PBS was used to wash the cells. The cells were incubated with PBS containing 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 30 min at room temperature, and a mouse monoclonal anti-PKCα (1:100) or anti-PKCε (1:100) antibody was added at 4 °C overnight. After washing with PBS, a FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody was added and incubated for 90 min. After washing with PBS three times, fluorescent glycerol was used for mounting, and the cells were observed under a microscope.

PKC translocation

A PKC translocation assay was conducted according to the procedure described by Etcheberrigaray et al. with some modifications [14]. In brief, after cell lysis in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 5 mM DTT, 0.32 M sucrose and 2 mM PMSF), the extracts were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatants were regarded as the cytosolic fractions. The pellets were incubated with the same lysis buffer, to which 1% Triton X-100 was added on ice for 45 min. After centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C, the supernatants were collected for use as the membrane fractions. After BCA (bicinchoninic acid) quantification, 20 mg of protein mixed with 5 × loading buffer and 20 × reducing agent was boiled for 5 min and loaded onto a 7.5% SDS-PAGE gel. The following procedure was the same as that described above, except that the primary antibodies were mouse monoclonal anti-PKCα and anti-PKCε antibodies (1:1000 in BSA).

Statistical analysis

SPSS 19.0 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons between multiple groups were performed using one-way ANOVA, and comparisons between two groups were performed using LSD t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Effects of Aβ25-35 and donepezil on cell viability

Treatment with Aβ25-35 at 5, 10, 20 or 50 μmol/L for 24 h significantly (P < 0.05) decreased the cell viability from 85.26 ± 8.03 to 40.84 ± 4.28, whereas donepezil had no significant effects on the cell viability at any of the concentrations (from 0.5 μmol/L to 50 μmol/L) (Table 1).

Table 1 Effects of Aβ25-35 and donepezil on cell viability (n = 6, mean ± SD)
Full size table

Effects of donepezil on Aβ25-35-induced cell viability and LDH release

Compared with the normal control, 20 μmol/L Aβ25-35 significantly (P < 0.05) decreased cell viability but increased LDH release. Compared with the Aβ25-35, Aβ25-35 + 5, 10, 20 or 50 μmol donepezil significantly (P < 0.05) increased the cell viability from 57.35 ± 3.95 to 87.35 ± 7.42 but decreased LDH release from 164.57 ± 14.52 to 138.25 ± 5.93, indicating that 5–20 μmol donepezil antagonized the decrease in cell viability induced by 20 μmol Aβ25-35 (Table 2).

Table 2 Effects of donepezil on Aβ25-35-induced cell viability and LDH release (n = 6, mean ± SD)
Full size table

P-PKC and P-MARCKS expression

Compared with that in the normal control group, P-PKC and P-MARCKS expression was significantly (P < 0.05) increased in the 10 μmol donepezil-treated group (158.86 ± 11.62 and 147.56 ± 12.05, respectively). Compared with that in the donepezil-treated group, P-PKC and P-MARCKS expression was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased in the GF109203X + donepezil-treated group (99.67 ± 10.36 and 99.64 ± 8.86, respectively, Fig. 1 and Table 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effects of donepezil on PKC and MARCKS phosphorylation. A P-PKC. B P-MARCKS. 1. Normal control group; 2. Donepezil group; 3. GF109203X + donepezil group; 4. GF109203X group

Full size image
Table 3 P-PKC and P-MARCKS expression
Full size table

Effects of donepezil on PKC subtype distribution

Immunocytochemical fluorescence staining demonstrated that the PKCα and PKCε proteins were mostly evenly distributed in the cytoplasm in the normal control group but exhibited higher expression in the cytomembrane in the 10 μmol donepezil-treated group (Fig. 2). Additionally, the expression of the PKCα and PKCε isoforms in the cytosolic and membrane fractions was measured by Western blot separately to further confirm the subcellular distribution after donepezil treatment. The results showed that donepezil decreased the expression of PKCα (from 100 to 74.83 ± 9.41, P < 0.01) and PKCε (from 100 to 79.75 ± 8.16, P < 0.05) in the cytosolic fraction but increased their expression (PKCα: from 100 to 130.89 ± 12.45, P < 0.01; PKCε: from 100 to 148.39 ± 15.58, P < 0.001) in the membrane fraction (Fig. 3). This implies that donepezil can induce the translocation of the PKCα and PKCε isoforms from the cytosol to the membrane, indicating that donepezil administration can activate the PKC signalling pathway.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of donepezil on the subcellular distribution of PKC isoforms(scale = 40 μm). A PKCα in the normal control group. B PKCα in the donepezil group with. C PKCε in the normal control group. D. PKCε in the donepezil group

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of donepezil (Donep) on the subcellular distribution of the PKCα and PKCε isoforms. PC 12 cells were treated with vehicle alone or with 10 μm donepezil for 2 h. Cytosolic and membrane proteins were then extracted separately for Western blot analysis. Donepezil decreased the expression of PKCα (from 100 to 74.83 ± 9.41, P < 0.01) and PKCε (from 100 to 79.75 ± 8.16, P < 0.05) in the cytosolic fraction but increased their expression (PKCα from 100 to 130.89 ± 12.45, P < 0.01; PKCε: from 100 to 148.39 ± 15.58, P < 0.001) in the membrane fraction

Full size image

Discussion

Our study demonstrated that the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor donepezil antagonizes the ability of Aβ25-35 to decrease cell viability. This protective effect of donepezil was partially offset by the PKC inhibitor GF109203X, indicating that the PKC pathway participates in the cellular protective effect of donepezil. Donepezil increased the expression of P-PKC and P-MARCKS and altered the distribution of PKCα and PKCε, suggesting that donepezil has an activating effect on PKC, which may be the mechanism by which donepezil protects against Aβ25-35.

Twenty-four hours after treatment with 5–50 μmol/L Aβ25-35, the viability of PC 12 cells was decreased in a dose-dependent manner; however, donepezil at the same concentration did not significantly affect cell viability. In contrast, 1–50 μmol/L donepezil antagonized the neurotoxicity of 20 μmol Aβ25-35 at. Compared with the control, treatment with Aβ25-35 led to marked changes in PC 12 cells, including cell shrinkage, diminished cell bodies, reduced protrusions and decreased adherence ability. These cell changes were protective responses that resulted from exposure to foreign toxic substances, and pretreatment with donepezil significantly antagonized the toxic effects. However, the specific proteins that participate in the morphological changes of cells and the detailed mechanism remain to be explored.

PKC plays a very important regulatory role in the initiation and development of AD, and PKCα and PKCε are thought to be closely related to the nosogenesis of AD. Normally, PKC is located in the cytoplasm, and when it is activated, it is transported to the membrane serosa [15] through a process called protein trafficking. PKCε has also been found to modulate the activity of α secretase by participating in M receptor-mediated sAPPα secretion [16]. In the fibroblasts of AD patients, the function of PKC has been found to be lacking, leading to decreased responses of neurons to various growth factors and neurotransmitters; additionally, decreased PKC activity together with decreased trafficking ability of PKC subtypes is closely related to decreased memory and cognitive function [16, 17]. The downstream substrate of PKC, MARCKS, is expressed in the mouse brain and is associated with the spatial learning ability of animals. In senile plaques in AD, MARCKS coexists with PKC and Aβ, and the phosphorylation of MARCKS is considered to be a marker of PKC activation, which is associated with neuroprotection [18]. PKCε is often associated with preconditioning neuroprotection and mediates ischaemic tolerance by activating ERK in brain slices [19, 20]. PKCα has also been implicated in both cell survival and cell death signalling pathways and is activated in the rat brain upon ischaemic preconditioning [21,22,23]. The activation of PKC is neuroprotective and can increase neuronal strength against apoptosis and maintain cellular homeostasis through the phosphorylation of HSP27 [24, 25]. PKCε induces neuroprotection against ischaemia by regulating many pathways, including the phosphorylation of the mitochondria K + ATP channel [20], increased synaptosomal mitochondrial respiration [26] and the activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway [19], via N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors [20], and by regulating gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) synapses [27]. Our study demonstrated that donepezil is able to activate PKC and MARCKS by increasing their phosphorylation, which may be the molecular basis for its effects on cell viability and neuroprotection.

MARCKS phosphorylation is regarded as a marker of PKC activation. In their inactivated states, PKC isoforms are localized in the cytosolic fraction, but they translocate to the membrane fraction after activation. To determine whether donepezil can affect the subcellular distribution of PKC isoforms, PKCa and PKCε, the two main isoforms involved in the pathogenesis of AD, were evaluated after donepezil treatment. Since STED analysis technology is not available in our lab, we performed further experiments to support our point of view. To detect the subcellular distribution of the PKC isoforms, immunocytochemical staining was performed, and the subcellular distribution of the PKCα and PKCε proteins in the cytosolic and membrane fractions was also measured by Western blotting, as in our previous study [28]. The results showed that donepezil decreased PKCα and PKCε expression in the cytosolic fraction but increased the expression of these two isoforms in the membrane fraction (Fig. 3). This implies that donepezil can induce the translocation of the PKCα and PKCε isoforms from the cytosolic fraction to the membrane fraction. Higher levels of the PKCα and PKCε isoforms were found in the membrane fraction in the donepezil-treated groups than in the vehicle-treated groups, supporting our conclusion that donepezil can activate the PKC signalling pathway. Activation of the PKC signalling pathway may thus become a key to the development of new drugs for the treatment of dementia in Alzheimer’s disease, which may indicate the clinical significance of our study.

Apoptosis and subsequent loss of neuronal function induced by various pathological and physiological factors may be the common pathological changes in neurodegenerative diseases, and protecting the function of the remaining neurons is one approach to treatment. As a specific and potent acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, donepezil is able to improve cognitive function in mild and moderate AD patients by increasing cholinergic nerve function and activating PKC to antagonize apoptosis. Donepezil can also increase the secretion of amyloid precursor protein α to support neurons and consequently exert its neuroprotective effect [13].

In our previous study, two cell lines were used in one experiment. When we investigated the effects of the protein kinase C activator TPPB on amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing, we used PC12 cells and SH-SY5YAPP695 cells, human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells stably transfected with human wild-type APP695 cDNA [29]. The same cells were used to study PMS777, a new cholinesterase inhibitor with anti-platelet activated factor activity [30]. We used human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells and PC12 cells to study the effect of deprenyl on APP processing [28]. These three experiments showed similar results, including the effects of these agents on APP expression, sAPPα secretion, and Aβ secretion, in the two cell lines [28,29,30]. In neuroprotective studies, we investigated the effects of erythropoietin on Aβ-induced neurotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells and PC 12 cells, and the results showed the same trend [31, 32]. Although the two cell lines come from two different species, the experiments showed similar results. Thus, in the present study, we exposed PC12 cells to Aβ as an in vitro model for investigating the neuroprotective effects of donepezil.

Our study is clinically significant because extracellular deposits of Aβ protein is able to result in formation of senile plaques in the hippocampus, which is the pathological characteristics of AD associated with neurodegeneration. Among the fragments studied thus far, Aβ25-35 represents the shortest fragment of Aβ, which is processed in vivo by brain proteases. Aβ25-35 is the functional domain of Aβ required for its neurotoxic effect in dementia clinically, and it retains the toxicity of the full-length peptide [33]. It is highly cytotoxic to neuronal cells and widely used both in vitro and in vivo in neuroscience research [34], including our own previous studies [2, 31, 32, 35]. Thus, Aβ25-35 was chosen for this experiment. The doses of Aβ25-35 in our study were used according to relevant studies [36, 37]. We firstly applied 5, 10, 20 or 50 μmol/L of Aβ25-35 to test the neurotoxicity of Aβ25-35 in the PC 12 cells. After this test, we chose the concentration of 20 μmol/L of Aβ25-35 for the protective experiment of donepezil. At the concentration of 20 μmol/L of Aβ25-35 to test the protective effect of donepezil, the cell viability was 56% (as determined by the MTT assay). If donepezil is added after Aβ administration, there may not be enough cells left to be rescued by donepezil, and the neuroprotective effect of donepezil would consequently be difficult to show. If a lower concentration of Aβ25-35 (5 or 10 μmol/L, for instance) is used, the neuroprotection afforded by donepezil may not be necessary, and thus its potential neuroprotective ability would also be difficult to show. Thus, we used Aβ25-35 at a concentration of 20 μmol/L (which damaged a portion of the cells) and added donepezil before Aβ administration to show its neuroprotective effect against Aβ.

Pretreating cells with donepezil before adding Aβ is a prophylactic approach that may not mimic the in vivo situation. Before treatment with Aβ25-35 in our study, the effect of donepezil on cell viability was tested with the concentration of 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20 and 50 μmol/L, none of which had a negative effect on the PC 12 cells. Then, donepezil at 5, 10, 20 and 50 μmol/L was used to test its neuroprotective effect on the PC 12 cells after treatment with Aβ25-35. The protective effect of donepezil was dose dependent when used in the doses range of 5, 10, 20 and 50 μmol/L for the treatment of PC 12 cells. In the treatment of cells, we used the concentration μmol/L of the donepezil. When used in human for the treatment of AD, the dose of donepezil is mg/d and the highest dose of donepezil is 10 mg per day, which is probably to prevent possible side effects caused by larger-dose donepezil.

In conclusion, donepezil can antagonize Aβ25-35-induced neurotoxicity in PC 12 cells, and the activation of PKC may account for the neuroprotective effect of donepezil. Activation of PKC may become a key to develop novel approaches for the treatment of dementia in Alzheimer’s disease.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials will be available from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Cai P, Fang SQ, Yang XL, et al. Rational design and multibiological profiling of novel donepezil-trolox hybrids against alzheimer’s disease, with cholinergic, antioxidant, neuroprotective, and cognition enhancing properties. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017;8(11):2496–511. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang HQ, Li X, Yang WM, et al. Neuroprotective effects of new protein kinase C activator TPPB against Abeta(2)(5)(-)(3)(5) induced neurotoxicity in PC12 cells. Neurochem Res. 2012;37(10):2213–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-012-0846-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gandy S, DeKosky ST. Toward the treatment and prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: rational strategies and recent progress. Annu Rev Med. 2013;64:367–83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-092611-084441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Risacher SL, Saykin AJ. Neuroimaging and other biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: the changing landscape of early detection. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:621–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Selkoe DJ. Altered structural proteins in plaques and tangles: what do they tell us about the biology of Alzheimer’s disease? Neurobiol Aging. 1986;7(6):425–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ye CY, Lei Y, Tang XC, et al. Donepezil attenuates Abeta-associated mitochondrial dysfunction and reduces mitochondrial Abeta accumulation in vivo and in vitro. Neuropharmacology. 2015;95:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.02.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hardy J, Selkoe DJ. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 2002;297(5580):353–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klafki HW, Staufenbiel M, Kornhuber J, et al. Therapeutic approaches to Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 11):2840–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noh MY, Koh SH, Kim Y, et al. Neuroprotective effects of donepezil through inhibition of GSK-3 activity in amyloid-beta-induced neuronal cell death. J Neurochem. 2009;108(5):1116–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05837.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Romberg C, Mattson MP, Mughal MR, et al. Impaired attention in the 3xTgAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: rescue by donepezil (Aricept). J Neurosci. 2011;31(9):3500–7. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5242-10.2011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang SS, Hong H, Chen L, et al. Involvement of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 in Abeta1-42-induced neurotoxicity in vitro and in vivo. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(3):590–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.09.036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hashimoto M, Kazui H, Matsumoto K, et al. Does donepezil treatment slow the progression of hippocampal atrophy in patients with Alzheimer’s disease? Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(4):676–82. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zimmermann M, Gardoni F, Marcello E, et al. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors increase ADAM10 activity by promoting its trafficking in neuroblastoma cell lines. J Neurochem. 2004;90(6):1489–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02680.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Etcheberrigaray R, Tan M, Dewachter I, et al. Therapeutic effects of PKC activators in Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(30):11141–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403921101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang HQ, Sun ZK, Ba MW, et al. Involvement of protein trafficking in deprenyl-induced alpha-secretase activity regulation in PC12 cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009;610(1–3):37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.03.047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cisse M, Braun U, Leitges M, et al. ERK1-independent alpha-secretase cut of beta-amyloid precursor protein via M1 muscarinic receptors and PKCalpha/epsilon. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2011;47(3):223–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2011.04.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hongpaisan J, Sun MK, Alkon DL. PKC epsilon activation prevents synaptic loss, Abeta elevation, and cognitive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2011;31(2):630–43. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5209-10.2011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Su R, Han ZY, Fan JP, et al. A possible role of myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate in endocytic pathway of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Bull. 2010;26(4):338–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-010-0131-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lange-Asschenfeldt C, Raval AP, Dave KR, et al. Epsilon protein kinase C mediated ischemic tolerance requires activation of the extracellular regulated kinase pathway in the organotypic hippocampal slice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004;24(6):636–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WCB.0000121235.42748.BF.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Raval AP, Dave KR, Mochly-Rosen D, et al. Epsilon PKC is required for the induction of tolerance by ischemic and NMDA-mediated preconditioning in the organotypic hippocampal slice. J Neurosci. 2003;23(2):384–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cui XY, Li JF, Han S, et al. Hypoxic preconditioning increases cPKCgamma membrane translocation in murine brain. Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2004;56(4):461–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurkinen K, Busto R, Goldsteins G, et al. Isoform-specific membrane translocation of protein kinase C after ischemic preconditioning. Neurochem Res. 2001;26(10):1139–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang D, Anantharam V, Kanthasamy A, et al. Neuroprotective effect of protein kinase C delta inhibitor rottlerin in cell culture and animal models of Parkinson’s disease. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;322(3):913–22. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.107.124669.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lambert H, Charette SJ, Bernier AF, et al. HSP27 multimerization mediated by phosphorylation-sensitive intermolecular interactions at the amino terminus. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(14):9378–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rogalla T, Ehrnsperger M, Preville X, et al. Regulation of Hsp27 oligomerization, chaperone function, and protective activity against oxidative stress/tumor necrosis factor alpha by phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(27):18947–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dave KR, DeFazio RA, Raval AP, et al. Ischemic preconditioning targets the respiration of synaptic mitochondria via protein kinase C epsilon. J Neurosci. 2008;28(16):4172–82. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5471-07.2008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. DeFazio RA, Raval AP, Lin HW, et al. GABA synapses mediate neuroprotection after ischemic and epsilonPKC preconditioning in rat hippocampal slice cultures. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29(2):375–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2008.126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang HQ, Ba MW, Ren RJ, et al. Mitogen activated protein kinase and protein kinase C activation mediate promotion of sAPPalpha secretion by deprenyl. Neurochem Int. 2007;50(1):74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2006.07.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang HQ, Pan J, Ba MW, et al. New protein kinase C activator regulates amyloid precursor protein processing in vitro by increasing alpha-secretase activity. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26(2):381–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05648.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang HQ, Sun ZK, Zhao YX, et al. PMS777, a new cholinesterase inhibitor with anti-platelet activated factor activity, regulates amyloid precursor protein processing in vitro. Neurochem Res. 2009;34(3):528–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-008-9816-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun ZKYH, Lu GQ. Effects of erythropoietin on cell apoptosis induced by β-amyloid peptide. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Chin Ed). 2007;27(10):1177–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhi-Kun S, Hong-Qi Y, Zhi-Quan W, et al. Erythropoietin prevents PC12 cells from beta-amyloid-induced apoptosis via PI3KAkt pathway. Transl Neurodegener. 2012;1(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-9158-1-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Pike CJ, Walencewicz-Wasserman AJ, Kosmoski J, et al. Structure-activity analyses of beta-amyloid peptides: contributions of the beta 25–35 region to aggregation and neurotoxicity. J Neurochem. 1995;64(1):253–65. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.64010253.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Giunta S, Galeazzi R, Valli MB, et al. Transferrin neutralization of amyloid beta 25–35 cytotoxicity. Clin Chim Acta. 2004;350(1–2):129–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cccn.2004.07.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun ZK, Yang HQ, Pan J, et al. Protective effects of erythropoietin on tau phosphorylation induced by beta-amyloid. J Neurosci Res. 2008;86(13):3018–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.21745.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Choi SLJ, Kim H. Korean Red Ginseng Inhibits Amyloid-β-Induced Apoptosis and Nucling Expression in Human Neuronal Cells. Pharmacology. 2020;105(9–10):586–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Song NYH, Pang W, Qie Z, Lu H, Tan L, Li H, Sun S, Lian F, Qin C, Jiang Y. Mulberry extracts alleviate aβ 25–35-induced injury and change the gene expression profile in PC12 cells. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/150617.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Research, Shijiazhuang People’s Hospital, 9 Fangbei Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei Province, China

    Bu-Lang Gao

  2. Neurology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University, Zhengzhou, 450003, China

    Ning-Ning Che & Xue Li

  3. Department of Laboratory Test, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450003, China

    Chun-Feng Ren

Authors
  1. Bu-Lang Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ning-Ning Che
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xue Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chun-Feng Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BLG contributed to study design. BLG and NNC conducted experiment. BLG, NNC, XL and CFR collected data. CFR supervised this study. BLG was involved in writing and revision of the paper. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bu-Lang Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shijiazhuang People’s Hospital. This is cell experiment and no patients have been enrolled.

Consent for publication

The authors agreed to the publication of all the data and materials.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, BL., Che, NN., Li, X. et al. Neuroprotective effects of donepezil against Aβ25-35-induced neurotoxicity. Eur J Med Res 27, 219 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00862-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00862-1

Keywords

  • Donepezil
  • Beta amyloid 25–35
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Protein kinase C
  • Neuroprotection

European Journal of Medical Research

ISSN: 2047-783X

Contact us