Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinical verification of the relationship between serum lipid metabolism and immune activity in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

European Journal of Medical Research volume 28, Article number: 2 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Lipid metabolism has been recently reported to affect the prognosis and tumor immune activity in cancer patients. However, the effect of lipid metabolism on chemosensitivity in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains unclear.

Methods

We examined 327 patients with breast cancer who were treated with NAC followed by curative surgery. The correlations between the serum levels of total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG) and the clinicopathological features, including the efficacy of NAC, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), were evaluated retrospectively.

Results

Serum TG levels were increased after NAC in all the subtypes, and the rate of change was the highest, especially in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (21.0% → 48.1%). In addition, only TNBC patients with an objective response (OR) had significantly higher TG levels after NAC than those without (P = 0.049). Patients with a high ALC before NAC had significantly higher TG levels after NAC than patients with all breast cancer (P = 0.001), HER2-enriched breast cancer (P = 0.021), and TNBC (P = 0.008). Patients with a low NLR before NAC had significantly higher TG levels after NAC only among patients with TNBC (P = 0.025). In patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-enriched breast cancer, the group with normal TC levels before NAC had significantly better OS than those with high TC levels (P = 0.013, log-rank test), and in patients with TNBC, the group with high TC levels after NAC had significantly better OS than those with normal TC levels (P = 0.014, log-rank test).

Conclusions

Good systemic immune activity and chemosensitivity may be associated with lipid metabolism regulated by NAC in TNBC patients.

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the gold standard treatment for breast cancer and its use has increased the rate of breast-conserving surgery [1, 2]. In addition, the pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC is a predictor of good outcome, and its prognostic value is greatest in aggressive subtypes, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [3]. These intrinsic breast cancer subtypes have a high malignancy and immune activity. We have reported previously that immune-related biomarkers, including the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in biopsy specimens before NAC, are associated significantly with high pCR rates in these breast cancer subtypes [4].

Immunometabolism has become a relatively new field in cancer immunotherapy, and it has been recognized that the regulation of metabolism can enhance antitumor immunity [5,6,7]. In the case of lipid metabolism, obesity has been shown to be associated positively with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive women [8, 9]. In addition, while epidemiological evidence has shown no association between the use of agents for dyslipidemia, mainly statins, and reduced breast cancer incidence, it supports a protective effect of these drugs on reducing breast cancer recurrence or mortality [10]. Moreover, several basic studies have shown that statins can suppress cancer cell proliferation, exert anti-angiogenic effects, and reduce the invasiveness and metastatic potential of breast cancer cells [11,12,13,14,15,16]. In addition, Crocetto et al. reported that the lipid alterations may be a potential tumor biomarker to detect bladder cancer, endocrine-related cancer, in clinical practice [17]; however, the relationship between lipid metabolism and immune activity in breast cancer patients has not been sufficiently investigated.

On the other hand, chemotherapy enhances antitumor immune responses [18, 19]. Some studies have revealed that changes in the lymphocytic subpopulations after NAC can be used as prognostic markers in patients with breast cancer patients [20,21,22,23]. In contrast, other studies have examined the metabolic changes before and after chemotherapy in breast cancer patients and showed significant changes in lipid levels [24, 25]. Furthermore, Tian et al. reported that NAC exerts an adverse effect on lipid levels during chemotherapy [26].

The present study investigated the correlation between lipid metabolism, antitumor immune responses, and chemosensitivity in patients with breast cancer treated with NAC.

Methods

Patient background

Data from the Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine (Osaka, Japan) between April 2007 and March 2018 were analyzed. A total of 351 patients were diagnosed with early stage breast cancer (stage IIA, IIB, IIIA) and underwent with primary systemic treatment and curative surgery. We excluded 24 patients treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and included 327 patients treated with NAC in this study. T and N factors and tumor stage were stratified based on the TNM Classification, UICC Seventh Edition [27]. Tumors were classified into intrinsic subtypes according to the immunohistochemical expression of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and HER2. We defined ER + and/or PgR + and HER2-breast cancer as luminal, ER + and/or PgR + and HER2 + breast cancer as luminal-HER2, ER- and PgR-, HER2 + breast cancer as HER2-enriched, and ER-, PgR-, and HER2-breast cancer as TNBC. The antitumor effect was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [28]. The objective response (OR) was calculated as the sum of the clinical partial response and complete response (CR). All the patients underwent mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery after NAC. The pCR was defined as the complete disappearance of the invasive compartment of the lesion with or without intraductal components, including the lymph nodes” [29]. Postoperative adjuvant therapy suitable for each intrinsic breast cancer subtype was performed, and standard postoperative radiotherapy to the remnant breast was administered if necessary. All patients underwent physical examinations, blood tests, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and bone scintigraphy scans. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from curative surgery to death from any cause, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as freedom from all locoregional and distant recurrences. The median follow-up time for the assessment of OS was 5.5 years (range 0.2–12.4 years) and for RFS was 4.9 years (range 0.1–12.0 years).

Blood sample analysis

Peripheral blood samples were obtained at the time of diagnosis, and preoperative blood samples were obtained within a week before surgery. We evaluated the serum lipid levels, including total cholesterol (TC) levels [categorized as low (≤ 149 mg/dl), normal (150–219 mg/dl), and high (≥ 220 mg/dl)] and triglyceride (TG) levels [categorized as low (≤ 49 mg/dl), normal (50–149 mg/dl), and high (≥ 150 mg/dl)]. The differential white blood cell counts were analyzed using a Coulter LH 750 Hematology Analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was calculated from the blood samples by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using the JMP13 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Associations among the variables were analyzed using the χ2 or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. OS and RFS were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Clinicopathological responses of all the breast cancer patients to NAC

The differences in clinicopathological features due to intrinsic breast cancer subtypes are presented in Table 1. A total of 327 patients were included in this study. Among these, 108 (33.0%), 42 (12.9%), 72 (22.0%), and 105 (32.1%) had luminal, luminal-HER2, HER2-enriched, and TNBC, respectively. NAC-related pCR was observed in 121 patients (37.0%). The evaluation based on the clinicopathological features revealed that the pCR rate was significantly higher in HER2-enriched (59.7%, 43/72) and TNBC patients (44.8%, 47/105) (P < 0.001). OR was observed in 295 patients (90.2%). The OR rate was high in all the breast cancer subtypes, and no significant differences were observed (P = 0.070). Patients with high TC levels increased after NAC in each breast cancer subtypes other than HER2-enriched. Furthermore, patients with TG levels increased after NAC in all subtypes, and the rate of change was highest especially in TNBC (21.0% → 48.1%).

Table 1 Differences in clinicopathological features due to intrinsic breast cancer subtypes in 327 patients
Full size table

In all breast cancer patients, RFS and OS were significantly longer in patients who achieved pCR than in those who did not (P < 0.001 and P = 0.006, log-rank, respectively; Additional file 1: Fig. S1a, Additional file 2: Fig. S2a). Furthermore, these outcomes were also significantly better in patients who achieved OR than in those who did not (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, log-rank, respectively; Additional file 3: Figs. S3a, Additional file 4: Fig. S4a). In addition, we investigated the prognostic factors for RFS and OS for each breast cancer subtype. Among patients with luminal cancer, no significant differences were observed in RFS (P = 0.882, P = 0.399, log-rank, respectively) and OS (P = 0.861, P = 0.202, log-rank, respectively) according to the clinicopathological responses, pCR, and OR (Additional file 1: Fig. S1b, Additional file 2: Fig. S2b, Additional file 3: Fig. S3b, Additional file 4: Fig. S4b). In contrast, among the patients with TNBC, RFS (P = 0.005, P < 0.001, log-rank, respectively) and OS (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, log-rank, respectively) were significantly longer in patients who achieved pCR or OR than in those who did not (Additional file 1: Fig. S1e, Additional file 2: Fig. S2e, Additional file 3: Fig. S3e, Additional file 4: Fig. S4e).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Analysis of total cholesterol (TC) before NAC and overall survival (OS) in patients with all breast cancer subtypes. OS was not significantly different between patients with normal TC and high TC levels among all breast cancer (P = 0.388, log-rank) (a). OS was not significantly different between patients with normal TC and high TC levels in luminal breast cancer (P = 0.108, log-rank) (b). OS was not significantly different between patients with normal TC and high TC levels in luminal-human-epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched breast cancer (P = 0.801, log-rank) (c). Patients with normal TC before NAC had significantly better OS of HER2-enriched (P = 0.013, log-rank) (d). OS was not significantly different between patients with normal TC and high TC levels in triple-negative breast cancer (P = 0.075, log-rank) (e)

Full size image

Analysis of relationships between lipid metabolism and chemosensitivity and prognosis

The relationship between lipid metabolism and chemosensitivity was examined (Table 2). There were no significant correlations between lipid metabolism and the pCR in any breast cancer subtype. In contrast, only TNBC patients with OR had significantly higher TG levels after NAC than patients without OR (P = 0.049).

Table 2 Relationships between lipid metabolism and chemosensitivity
Full size table

We also investigated the prognostic value of serum lipid levels before and after NAC for each intrinsic breast cancer subtype. In patients with HER2-enriched breast cancer, those with normal TC levels before NAC had a significantly better OS than those with high TC levels (P = 0.013, log-rank test) (Fig. 1d), and in patients with TNBC, the group with high TC levels after NAC had significantly better OS than those with normal TC levels (P = 0.014, log-rank test) (Fig. 2e). There was no association between recurrence and TC levels. Also, there was no relationship between the prognosis and triglyceride levels before and after NAC (Additional files 5–10: Figs. S5–S10).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Analysis of total cholesterol (TC) after NAC and overall survival (OS) in patients with all breast cancer subtypes. OS was not significantly different between patients with normal TC and high TC levels among all breast cancer (P = 0.606, log-rank) (a). OS was not significantly different between patients with normal TC and high TC levels in luminal breast cancer (P = 0.916, log-rank) (b). OS was not significantly different between patients with normal TC and high TC levels in luminal-human-epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched breast cancer (P = 0.387, log-rank) (c). OS was not significantly different between patients with normal TC and high TC levels in HER2-enriched breast cancer (P = 0.148, log-rank) (d). Patients with high TC after NAC had significantly better OS of triple-negative breast cancer (P = 0.014, log-rank) (e)

Full size image

Analysis of relationships between lipid metabolism and immune activity

The pre-NAC ALC ranged from 712.8 to 4446.2 (mean, 1811.0; median, 1749; standard deviation, 613.9), and the pre-NAC NLR ranged from 0.5 to 10.6 (mean, 2.3; median, 2.0; standard deviation, 1.2). The post-NAC ALC ranged from 285.6 to 3697.7 (mean, 1122.4; median, 1005.4; standard deviation, 517.0), and the post-NAC NLR ranged from 0.3 to 15.9 (mean, 2.9; median, 2.4; standard deviation, 1.9). We defined the pre-NAC median as the cutoff value for the ALC and NLR. There were no significant correlations between the systemic immune activity and the effect of NAC in all the breast cancer patients or each of the breast cancer subtypes (Additional file 11: Table S1).

The relationship between lipid metabolism and systemic immune activity is shown in Table 3. Patients with a high ALC before NAC had significantly higher TG levels after NAC in all the breast cancers (P = 0.001). In addition, among the patients with HER2-enriched breast cancer, high TG levels after NAC were associated significantly with a high ALC before NAC (P = 0.021), and high TG levels before NAC were associated significantly with a high ALC after NAC (P = 0.046). Furthermore, among patients with TNBC, high TG levels after NAC were associated significantly with a high ALC (P = 0.008) and a low NLR (P = 0.025) before NAC, while high TG levels before NAC were associated significantly with a low NLR after NAC (P = 0.034).

Table 3 Relationships between lipid metabolism and immune activity
Full size table

Discussion

In the present study, NAC increased serum TG levels, particularly in patients with TNBC. Some previous studies showed that serum lipid levels increased significantly after chemotherapy and that the TG levels may be a sensitive biomarker for determining the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy [24, 30]. Many anticancer drugs are metabolized in liver and may cause non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by variety of mechanisms [31]. However, this phenomenon has not yet been fully studied. To the best of our knowledge, our study was the first to analyze the predictive value of lipid metabolism for chemosensitivity of breast cancer patients treated with NAC and to stratify the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer.

In this study, patients with reduced tumor size had significantly higher TG levels after NAC in only TNBC. Sharma et al. reported that some chemotherapy agents affect serum lipid levels by regulating the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism in liver cells [32]. Therefore, it is considered that there is a correlation between the effects of NAC and lipid metabolism in TNBC.

The efficacy of NAC, especially in terms of the pCR, is currently acknowledged as an indicator of good outcomes in patients with TNBC and HER2-enriched breast cancer, which have high immune activity [3, 33, 34]. Hence, it is expected that there will be an association between lipid metabolism and tumor immune activity in TNBC. Recent studies have reported that the regulation of metabolism can affect the tumor immune microenvironment and enhance the antitumor immune response [5,6,7]. In our study, good systemic immune activity, a high ALC, or low NLR before NAC were associated significantly with high TG levels after NAC in patients with TNBC or HER2-enriched breast cancer.

However, no relationships were observed between the pre-NAC lipid levels and NAC efficacy. In addition, the serum lipid levels before NAC showed no significant relationships with the ALC or NLR. Hence, it was difficult to predict chemosensitivity or systemic immune activity based on serum lipid levels prior to NAC.

In the present study, no significant associations were observed between the systemic immune activity and the effect of NAC. However, in our previous study, we set the cutoff value of pre-NAC NLR to 3.0, in the same breast cancer patients, and the pCR rate was significantly higher in TNBC patients with a good immune status, low NLR group [4]. This result suggested that not only the effect of tumor reduction, but also the effect of increasing serum lipid levels is recognized in patients with good systemic immune activity.

Although the TG levels after NAC may be an indicator of chemosensitivity in TNBC, they are not useful predictive markers of recurrence. The reason for this may be that changes in the lipid profiles after NAC are temporary [26]. We presumed that a favorable prognosis may not be based on lipid levels at the time of diagnosis or after NAC, but is induced by the maintenance good lipid metabolism after surgery.

This study has some limitations. First, this was a single-center, retrospective study, then the sample size was relatively small. Second, in our study, serum TC levels were associated with better OS in patients with HER2-enriched breast cancer or TNBC. However, we did not have detailed data on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. In addition, many factors influence serum lipid levels, including lifestyle and adherence to medication. Considering these limitations, further prospective multicenter studies are needed.

Conclusions

This is the first study to demonstrate the clinical relationships between lipid metabolism, chemosensitivity, and systemic immune activity in patients with breast cancer treated with NAC. The findings of this study indicated that a good systemic immune activity and the effect of NAC may be associated with lipid metabolism regulated by chemotherapy in patients with TNBC.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ALC:

Absolute lymphocyte count

BMI:

Body mass index

CR:

Complete response

ER:

Estrogen receptor

HER2:

Human-epidermal growth factor receptor 2

NAC:

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

NLR:

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

OR:

Objective response

ORR:

Objective response rate

OS:

Overall survival

pCR:

Pathological complete response

PgR:

Progesterone receptor

RFS:

Recurrence-free survival

TC:

Total-cholesterol

TG:

Triglyceride

TNBC:

Triple-negative breast cancer

References

  1. Chen AM, Meric-Bernstam F, Hunt KK, Thames HD, Oswald MJ, Outlaw ED, Strom EA, McNeese MD, Kuerer HM, Ross MI, et al. Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the MD Anderson cancer center experience. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(12):2303–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beriwal S, Schwartz GF, Komarnicky L, Garcia-Young JA. Breast-conserving therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: long-term results. Breast J. 2006;12(2):159–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, Bonnefoi H, Cameron D, Gianni L, Valagussa P, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):164–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asano Y, Kashiwagi S, Onoda N, Noda S, Kawajiri H, Takashima T, Ohsawa M, Kitagawa S, Hirakawa K. Predictive value of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio for efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1104–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ho PC, Liu PS. Metabolic communication in tumors: a new layer of immunoregulation for immune evasion. J Immunother Cancer. 2016;4:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Allison KE, Coomber BL, Bridle BW. Metabolic reprogramming in the tumour microenvironment: a hallmark shared by cancer cells and T lymphocytes. Immunology. 2017;152(2):175–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li X, Wenes M, Romero P, Huang SC, Fendt SM, Ho PC. Navigating metabolic pathways to enhance antitumour immunity and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16(7):425–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371(9612):569–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wada K, Nagata C, Tamakoshi A, Matsuo K, Oze I, Wakai K, Tsuji I, Sugawara Y, Mizoue T, Tanaka K, et al. Body mass index and breast cancer risk in Japan: a pooled analysis of eight population-based cohort studies. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(2):519–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahern TP, Lash TL, Damkier P, Christiansen PM, Cronin-Fenton DP. Statins and breast cancer prognosis: evidence and opportunities. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(10):e461-468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu X, Luo Y, Zhou Y, Zhang Q, Wang J, Wei N, Mi M, Zhu J, Wang B, Chang H, et al. BRCA1 overexpression sensitizes cancer cells to lovastatin via regulation of cyclin D1-CDK4-p21WAF1/CIP1 pathway: analyses using a breast cancer cell line and tumoral xenograft model. Int J Oncol. 2008;33(3):555–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang G, Cao R, Wang Y, Qian G, Dan HC, Jiang W, Ju L, Wu M, Xiao Y, Wang X. Simvastatin induces cell cycle arrest and inhibits proliferation of bladder cancer cells via PPARgamma signalling pathway. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35783.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Weis M, Heeschen C, Glassford AJ, Cooke JP. Statins have biphasic effects on angiogenesis. Circulation. 2002;105(6):739–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Massaro M, Zampolli A, Scoditti E, Carluccio MA, Storelli C, Distante A, De Caterina R. Statins inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in human endothelial cells: anti-angiogenic actions possibly contributing to plaque stability. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;86(2):311–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mandal CC, Ghosh-Choudhury N, Yoneda T, Choudhury GG, Ghosh-Choudhury N. Simvastatin prevents skeletal metastasis of breast cancer by an antagonistic interplay between p53 and CD44. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(13):11314–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Beckwitt CH, Clark AM, Ma B, Whaley D, Oltvai ZN, Wells A. Statins attenuate outgrowth of breast cancer metastases. Br J Cancer. 2018;119(9):1094–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Crocetto F, Pandolfo SD, Aveta A, Martino R, Trama F, Caputo VF, Barone B, Abate M, Sicignano E, Cilio S et al. A comparative study of the triglycerides/HDL ratio and pseudocholinesterase levels in patients with bladder cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(2).

  18. Zitvogel L, Kepp O, Kroemer G. Immune parameters affecting the efficacy of chemotherapeutic regimens. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(3):151–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vacchelli E, Galluzzi L, Fridman WH, Galon J, Sautes-Fridman C, Tartour E, Kroemer G. Trial watch: chemotherapy with immunogenic cell death inducers. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1(2):179–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ladoire S, Arnould L, Apetoh L, Coudert B, Martin F, Chauffert B, Fumoleau P, Ghiringhelli F. Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast carcinoma is associated with the disappearance of tumor-infiltrating foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(8):2413–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Miyashita M, Sasano H, Tamaki K, Chan M, Hirakawa H, Suzuki A, Tada H, Watanabe G, Nemoto N, Nakagawa S, et al. Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ and FOXP3+ lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer: its correlation with pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;148(3):525–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Asano Y, Kashiwagi S, Goto W, Kurata K, Noda S, Takashima T, Onoda N, Tanaka S, Ohsawa M, Hirakawa K. Tumour-infiltrating CD8 to FOXP3 lymphocyte ratio in predicting treatment responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of aggressive breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2016;103(7):845–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Goto W, Kashiwagi S, Takada K, Asano Y, Takahashi K, Fujita H, Takashima T, Tomita S, Hirakawa K, Ohira M. Significance of intrinsic breast cancer subtypes on the long-term prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Alexopoulos CG, Pournaras S, Vaslamatzis M, Avgerinos A, Raptis S. Changes in serum lipids and lipoproteins in cancer patients during chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1992;30(5):412–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Arpino G, De Angelis C, Buono G, Colao A, Giuliano M, Malgieri S, Cicala S, De Laurentiis M, Accurso A, Crispo A, et al. Metabolic and anthropometric changes in early breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;154(1):127–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tian W, Yao Y, Fan G, Zhou Y, Wu M, Xu D, Deng Y. Changes in lipid profiles during and after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in women with early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8): e0221866.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Greene FL, Sobin LH. A worldwide approach to the TNM staging system: collaborative efforts of the AJCC and UICC. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(5):269–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009’45(2):228–47.

  29. Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E, Bryant J, Fisher B. Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;30:96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rzymowska J. Effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on serum lipid levels in breast cancer patients. Pathobiology. 1999;67(3):129–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tarantino G, Citro V, Capone D: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a challenge from mechanisms to therapy. J Clin Med. 2019;9(1).

  32. Sharma AK, Wen L, Hall LR, Allan JG, Clark BJ. Metabolism of pyrithiobac sodium in soils and sediment, addressing bound residues via kinetics modeling. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64(29):5793–802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, Gerber B, Eiermann W, Hilfrich J, Huober J, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(15):1796–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bonnefoi H, Litiere S, Piccart M, MacGrogan G, Fumoleau P, Brain E, Petit T, Rouanet P, Jassem J, Moldovan C, et al. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent predictive factor irrespective of simplified breast cancer intrinsic subtypes: a landmark and two-step approach analyses from the EORTC 10994/BIG 1–00 phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(6):1128–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Tomomi Okawa (Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine) for helpful advice regarding data management.

Funding

This study was supported in part by Grants-in Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI, Nos. 19K18067, 17K10559, and 20K08938) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology of Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-Machi, Abeno-Ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan

    Wataru Goto, Shinichiro Kashiwagi, Koji Takada, Yuka Asano, Kana Ogisawa & Tamami Morisaki

  2. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-Machi, Abeno-Ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan

    Masatsune Shibutani, Hiroaki Tanaka & Kiyoshi Maeda

Authors
  1. Wataru Goto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shinichiro Kashiwagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Koji Takada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuka Asano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kana Ogisawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tamami Morisaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Masatsune Shibutani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hiroaki Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kiyoshi Maeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors were involved in the preparation of this manuscript. WG collected the data and wrote the manuscript. SK, KT, YA, KO and TM performed the operation and designed the study. WG and SK summarized the data and revised the manuscript. MS, HT, and KM provided a substantial contribution to the study design, performed the operation, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichiro Kashiwagi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

A written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from each subject in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki principles. Each patient or the patient’s family was fully informed of the investigational nature of this study and provided their written, informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Osaka City University (approve number #926).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Fig. S1 Recurrence-free survival (RFS) using Kaplan–Meier method in patients based on pCR or non-pCR with different intrinsic breast cancer subtype. All breast cancer (a), Luminal (b), Luminal-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (c), HER2-enrich (d) and triple-negative breast cancer (e).

Additional file 2

: Fig. S2. Overall survival (OS) using Kaplan–Meier method in patients based on pCR or non-pCR with different intrinsic breast cancer subtype. All breast cancer (a), Luminal (b), Luminal-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (c), HER2-enrich (d) and triple-negative breast cancer (e).

Additional file 3

: Fig. S3 Recurrence-free survival (RFS) using Kaplan–Meier method in patients based on OR or non-OR with different intrinsic breast cancer subtype. All breast cancer (a), Luminal (b), Luminal-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (c), HER2-enrich (d) and triple-negative breast cancer (e).

Additional file 4

: Fig. S4 Overall survival (OS) using Kaplan–Meier method in patients based on OR or non-OR with different intrinsic breast cancer subtype. All breast cancer (a), Luminal (b), Luminal-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (c), HER2-enrich (d) and triple-negative breast cancer (e).

Additional file 5

: Fig. S5 Recurrence-free survival (RFS) using Kaplan–Meier method in patients based on normal or high-total cholesterol before NAC with different intrinsic breast cancer subtype. All breast cancer (a), Luminal (b), Luminal-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (c), HER2-enrich (d) and triple-negative breast cancer (e).

Additional file 6

: Fig. S6 Recurrence-free survival (RFS) using Kaplan–Meier method in patients based on normal or high-total cholesterol after NAC with different intrinsic breast cancer subtype. All breast cancer (a), Luminal (b), Luminal-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (c), HER2-enrich (d) and triple-negative breast cancer (e).

Additional file 7

: Fig. S7 Recurrence-free survival (RFS) using Kaplan–Meier method in patients based on normal or high-triglyceride before NAC with different intrinsic breast cancer subtype. All breast cancer (a), Luminal (b), Luminal-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (c), HER2-enrich (d) and triple-negative breast cancer (e).

Additional file 8

: Fig. S8 Overall survival (OS) using Kaplan–Meier method in patients based on normal or high-triglyceride before NAC with different intrinsic breast cancer subtype. All breast cancer (a), Luminal (b), Luminal-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (c), HER2-enrich (d) and triple-negative breast cancer (e).

Additional file 9

: Fig. S9 Recurrence-free survival (RFS) using Kaplan–Meier method in patients based on normal or high-triglyceride after NAC with different intrinsic breast cancer subtype. All breast cancer (a), Luminal (b), Luminal-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (c), HER2-enrich (d) and triple-negative breast cancer (e).

Additional file 10

: Fig. S10 Overall survival (RFS) using Kaplan–Meier method in patients based on normal or high-triglyceride after NAC with different intrinsic breast cancer subtype. All breast cancer (a), Luminal (b), Luminal-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (c), HER2-enrich (d) and triple-negative breast cancer (e). Table S1. Relationships between immune activity and chemosensitivity.

Additional file 11

: Table S1. Relationships between immune activity and chemosensitivity.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goto, W., Kashiwagi, S., Takada, K. et al. Clinical verification of the relationship between serum lipid metabolism and immune activity in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Med Res 28, 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00964-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00964-w

Keywords

European Journal of Medical Research

ISSN: 2047-783X

Contact us