- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Roxadustat alleviates the inflammatory status in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent resistance by increasing the short-chain fatty acids producing gut bacteria
European Journal of Medical Research volume 28, Article number: 230 (2023)
Abstract
Background
Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) have improved the treatment of renal anemia, especially in patients resistant to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). HIF facilitates maintain gut microbiota homeostasis, which plays an important role in inflammation and iron metabolism, which are in turn key factors affecting ESA resistance. The current study aimed to investigate the effects of roxadustat on inflammation and iron metabolism and on the gut microbiota in patients with ESA resistance.
Methods
We conducted a self-controlled, single-center study including 30 patients with ESA resistance undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. All patients received roxadustat without iron agents for renal anemia. Hemoglobin and inflammatory factors were monitored. Fecal samples were collected before and after 3 months’ administration and the gut microbiota were analyzed by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing.
Results
Hemoglobin levels increased after treatment with roxadustat for 3 months (P < 0.05). Gut microbiota diversity and abundance also changed, with increases in short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria (Acidaminococcaceae, Butyricicoccus, Ruminococcus bicirculans, Ruminococcus bromii, Bifidobacterium dentium, Eubacterium hallii) (P < 0.05). Serum SCFA levels also increased (P < 0.05). Inflammatory factors, including interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon-γ, and endotoxin gradually decreased (P < 0.05). Serum hepcidin, ferritin, and total and unsaturated iron-binding capacities decreased (P < 0.05), while soluble transferrin receptor levels increased at each time point (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in serum iron and transferrin saturation at each time point. The abundance of Alistipes shahii was significantly negatively correlated with IL-6 and TNF-α (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
Roxadustat alleviated renal anemia in patients with ESA resistance by decreasing inflammatory factors and hepcidin levels and improving iron utilization. These effects were at least partly mediated by improved diversity and abundance of SCFA-producing gut bacteria, probably via activation of HIF.
Introduction
Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Renal anemia is estimated to affect 2 to 4 million of the approximately 20 million people in the United States with CKD [1], and > 90% of the 500,000 patients who undergo dialysis in China, leading to high hospitalization rates and a high incidence of cardiovascular events [2]. Renal anemia is a multifactorial process caused by relative erythropoietin (EPO) deficiency, uremia-induced inhibitors of erythropoiesis, shortened erythrocyte survival, and disordered iron homeostasis [3]. Resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) is mainly associated with abnormal iron metabolism and inflammatory anemia [4,5,6]. There has recently been great progress in the development of drugs for the treatment of renal anemia, including hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs), which have been shown to treat renal anemia safely and effectively, via multiple mechanisms [7]. The representative HIF-PHI, Roxadustat (FG-4592, FibroGen, Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA), has been widely used in clinical applications. Roxadustat induces hypoxia in cells, thus stimulating endogenous EPO synthesis, improving iron metabolism, and reducing inflammation [8]. HIF transcription factors comprise two subunits: an oxygen-sensitive α-subunit (HIF-1α, HIF-2α, or HIF-3α) and a constitutively expressed β-subunit [9]. HIF-1α is a master transcription factor related to cell proliferation and survival, iron metabolism, angiogenesis and glucose metabolism [10]. Notably, HIF-1α has been shown to maintain intestinal homeostasis by not only regulating the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier, but also improving the survival of intestinal microorganisms [11], while HIF-2α is involved in the regulation of intestinal iron transporters mediated by the intestinal microbiota. Intestinal microorganisms and their metabolites may inhibit HIF-2α under conditions of iron deficiency [12]. As the master intestinal transcriptional regulator of apical and basolateral iron transporters, HIF-2α is also sensitive to cellular iron and oxygen levels, which can affect transcriptional activation of the iron-absorption machinery to maintain systemic iron levels [13,14,15,16].
The human gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem and a key component of gastrointestinal homeostasis. Many studies have shown that the gut microbiota in patients with CKD differs compared with that in healthy people [17,18,19]. Changes in the gut microbiota and host reactions are related to the progression of CKD, as well as the increased risk of cardiovascular disease, uremic toxins, and inflammation [20, 21]. In 2011, Ritz proposed an “intestinal-renal syndrome” and derived the theory of an “intestinal-renal axis”, based on extensive studies [22]. This concluded that there was a bidirectional relationship between the kidney and intestine, in which functional impairment of one side could affect the normal function of the other side through various mechanisms, with important roles for the gut microbiota and its metabolites.
The mechanism of HIF-PHIs in the treatment of renal anemia has not yet been fully elucidated. We therefore conducted a prospective cohort study to explore the effect of roxadustat on the gut microbiota in hemodialysis (HD) patients with renal anemia and ESA resistance. The aim of this study was to determine if roxadustat could improve renal anemia in patients with ESA resistance by altering the intestinal microbiota, thereby correcting inflammation and iron metabolism disorders.
Materials and methods
Study population
Patients with renal anemia who underwent HD during January 2020 to December 2020 at Blood Purification Center of Dalian Municipal Central Hospital were enrolled in this study. The inclusion criteria were: patients aged ≥ 18 years with ESA resistance, whose dialysis age is more than 3 months, who had received stable HD three times weekly for > 12 weeks and who had complete medical records. The exclusion criteria were: diarrhea, enteral or parenteral nutrition intervention, gastrointestinal tumors, biliary inflammation, inflammatory bowel disease, and use of antibiotics, immunosuppressants, glucocorticoids, or probiotics in the past 3 months.
Anemia in CKD patients was defined according to the 2004 European Best Practice Guidelines Working Group [23] as follows: hemoglobin (Hb) levels were considered to be below normal if they were < 11.5 g/dL in women and < 13.5 g/dL in men (< 12 g/dL in those aged > 70 years), for patients living at altitudes < 1500 m.
ESA resistance was defined as failure to attain the target Hb concentration (Hb < 11 g/dL) despite receiving > 300 IU/kg/week (20,000 IU/week) erythropoietin or 1.5 mg/kg darbepoetin-alfa (100 mg/week) over a 3-month period, or a continued need for high dosages to maintain the target Hb level [23].
All study protocols conformed to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the institutional medical ethics committee of Dalian Municipal Central Hospital (No. YN2022-039-10), and all study patients provided written informed consent. The clinical information was extracted from the electronic medical records system of Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, and the privacy of the patients was fully protected. Fecal specimens were collected after routine diagnosis and treatment in the clinic, with no harm to the patients.
Laboratory measurements
The blood samples before and after 1 month, 3 months the application of roxadustat were collected. Approximately 3–5 mL venous blood samples for routine laboratory determinations were obtained immediately before dialysis treatment. Hemoglobin was determined by colorimetry using blood cell analyzer (XN-10, sysmex, Japan). Inflammatory factors, including interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-γ, endotoxin and EPO were measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the kit of DRG from Germany. Iron-metabolism indicators, including hepcidin, ferritin, total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), unsaturated iron-binding capacity (UIBC), transferrin saturation (TS), serum iron (SI), soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and serum short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were measured by ELISA using the kit of Meimian company from Jiangsu, China. Other laboratory parameters including albumin, creatine, urea nitrogen, calcium, phosphorus, β2 microglobulin, total cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured using an ADVIA 2400 Automatic Biochemistry Analyzer (Siemens, Germany). Dialysis adequacy was determined by the single-pool Kt/V (spKt/V), which was calculated quarterly using the second-generation equation of Daugirdas [24] based on pre- and post-HD blood urea, as follows: Kt/V = −ln(R − 0.008 × t) + [(4 − 3.5 × R) × UF/W], where R is the ratio of post-dialysis to pre-dialysis serum urea nitrogen concentration; t is the duration of HD (in hours); UF is the amount of ultrafiltration (in liters) during the HD session; and W is the post-dialysis weight (in kilograms).
Study design
This was a before–after control study of patients with renal anemia treated with roxadustat. All patients initially received roxadustat thrice weekly, based on body weight: patients weighing 45–< 60 kg received 100 mg roxadustat, and those weighing ≥ 60 kg received 120 mg three times weekly. No participant received iron agents during the study. Fecal specimens were collected before treatment and 3 months after the initiation of treatment with roxadustat. During the treatment, the hemoglobin level was measured every 2 weeks to adjust the dose of Roxadustat so that the hemoglobin level of participants can achieve the target of 110–120 g/L. Changes in Hb concentration, levels of inflammatory factors, indices of iron metabolism, and the occurrence of adverse effects were examined during the 3-month treatment period. The above information was obtained from medical records. Group A refers to the patients undergoing maintenance HD before treatment with roxadustat, while Group B refers to the same patients after treatment with roxadustat for 3 months.
Sample collection, DNA extraction, and 16S rRNA gene amplification sequencing
Fecal samples were collected at the hospital before each chemotherapy. Fresh fecal samples were collected from enrolled patients after natural defection in the clean toilet, using the scoop in the collection tube take 3–5 g fecal and place in the collection tube. The microbial genome was extracted using QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sample DNA purity and concentration were tested using a Nanodrop 2000 Spectrophotometer. We amplified the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene V3–V4 region using the TransGen AP221-02 Kit (TransGen, Beijing, China). The following PCR primers were used: 338F 5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′ and 806R 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′. The reaction volume (20 μL) comprised 5× FastPfu Buffer (4 μL), 2.5 mM dNTPs (2 μL), forward primer (0.8 μL), 5 μM reverse primer (0.8 μL), FastPfu Polymerase (0.4 μL), and template DNA (10 ng). Cycling proceeded as follows: 3 min at 95 °C twenty-seven cycles (30 sat 95 °C, 30 sat 55 °C, 45 sat 72 °C); 10 min at 72 °C. After amplicons extraction, samples were purified and quantified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, CA, USA) and QuantiFluor™-ST (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), respectively. Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar proportions and paired-end sequenced (2 × 250 bp) on the Illumina MiSeq platform with TruSeqTM DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
Bioinformatics
All fecal samples were analyzed by Novogene Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). Paired-end sequencing of the samples was then carried out using the Illumina NovaSeq sequencing platform. After read splicing and filtering, clustering of operational taxonomic unit (OTUs), species annotation, and abundance analysis were carried out using alpha and beta diversity analyses to examine the diversity of the gut microbiota. Alpha diversities of the fecal flora before and after roxadustat treatment were accessed using five metrics: Venn diagrams, species accumulation boxplots, rank abundance curves, rarefaction curves, and Shannon plots, which show species enrichment and distribution. Beta diversity is used to assess variations in species diversity between different environments. PCoA and PCA analyses [25, 26] showed the total intestinal flora differences. MRPP analysis showed differences in the bacterial compositions of the microbiota between two groups. T-tests provided the differences in the gut microbiota at each classification level (phylum, class, order, family, genus, species) between the two groups which emphasizes statistical significance and biological correlation, which can be used to identify significant differences in biomarkers between groups.
Sample size calculation
The equation for calculating sample size [27] is shown below.
z is the z score, ε is the margin of error, n is the population size, p̂ is the population proportion.
Determine the sample size necessary to estimate the alteration of gut microbiota after the application of roxadustat that identify as vegan with 95% confidence, and a margin of error of 20%. Assume a population proportion of 0.5, and unlimited population size. Remember that z for a 95% confidence level is 1.96. Refer to the table provided in the confidence level section for z scores of a range of confidence levels.
Thus, for the case above, a sample size of at least 24 participants would be necessary.
Statistical analysis
Continuous normally distributed variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. Data before and after the application of roxadustat at each time point were assessed by repeated-measures ANOVA, using Bonferroni analysis. The relationships between gut microbiota and clinical parameters were analyzed by Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 23 (IBM Corp., USA). Significant differences in relative abundances of genus between groups were corrected by Benn-Hochberg False discovery rate (FDR). All statistical tests were 2-sided, and P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. To detect the alteration in the inflammatory status after the application of Roxadustat, a sample size of 32 patients per group was necessary with a two-sided 5% significance level and a power of 80%.
Results
A total of 30 patients were included in this study to compare the changes in the gut microbiota spectrum after 3 months of roxadustat treatment (Fig. 1). The baseline characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. All participants were of Han ethnicity, born in northeastern China, and had a similar dietary pattern which did not alter during the 3 months. No adverse effects were observed during the 3 months of the participants’ medication. Changes in Hb levels during the 3 months are shown in Fig. 2. The Hb level in patient 7 was an outlier, but the results were confirmed by repeated analysis. Baseline Hb at enrollment was (85.93 ± 9.85) g/L, and this increased significantly to (94.97 ± 12.14) g/L after 2 weeks’ of roxadustat treatment (P < 0.001). Hb levels continued to increase gradually to (100.80 ± 11.97) g/L, (106.57 ± 13.06) g/L, and (109.20 ± 14.78) g/L after the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd months, respectively (P < 0.001). Ferritin, TIBC, UIBC, and hepcidin decreased significantly after the 1st and 3rd months (P < 0.05), while sTfR increased significantly (P < 0.05). Changes in iron-metabolism indices are shown in Table 2. Levels of inflammatory factors decreased significantly after the 1st and 3rd months (P < 0.001), as shown in Table 3.
EPO levels increased significantly (F = 1220.882, P < 0.001) from (6.76 ± 1.69) U/L at baseline to (9.33 ± 1.62) U/L after 1 month and (10.13 ± 1.56) U/L after 3 months.
Serum SCFA levels also increased significantly (F = 23.577, P < 0.001) from (53.21 ± 13.72) g/L at baseline to (60.71 ± 12.36) g/L after 1 month and (69.73 ± 11.67) g/L after 3 months.
Species richness and diversity
We assessed the alpha diversities of the fecal flora before and after roxadustat treatment using five metrics: Venn diagrams, species accumulation boxplots, rank abundance curves, rarefaction curves, and Shannon plots, to show species enrichment and distribution. Following clustering, common and unique OTUs among the groups were analyzed and displayed in a Venn diagram. There were 1618 unique OTUs in Group A, 1131 unique OTUs in Group B, and 5034 OTUs that were shared by both groups (Fig. 3A). The species accumulation boxplot suggests that the boxplot tends toward a more gradual position, indicating that the sample size was sufficient for analysis of the fecal microbiota (Fig. 3B). The slope of the rank abundance curve reflected the richness and evenness of the species in the sample (Fig. 3C): species richness was reflected by the width of the curve, and the uniformity of species in the sample was reflected by the smoothness of the curve in the vertical direction. The rarefaction curve reflected the richness and evenness of the species in the two groups (Fig. 3D): a flat curve indicated that the volume of sequencing data was reasonable. Microbial community diversity and richness were also evaluated using the Shannon indice. According to the OTU distribution, the Shannon index differed significantly between the two groups (Fig. 3E) (P = 0.047), suggesting that the community richness and diversity of the two groups differed.
Differences in microbiota between Group A and Group B
Beta diversity is used to assess variations in species diversity between different environments. The beta diversity measurements of the samples taken before and after roxadustat treatment are shown in Fig. 4A. PCoA (Fig. 4B) and PCA analyses (Fig. 4C) showed that the intestinal flora differed significantly between the two groups, but could not be completely separated. In addition, MRPP analysis (Table 4) also showed significant differences in the bacterial compositions of the microbiota between Groups A and B (P = 0.029).
There were significant differences in the gut microbiota at each classification level (phylum, class, order, family, genus, species) between Groups A and B (t-tests, P < 0.05) (Fig. 5 and Table 5). There were significant differences between the two groups in the abundances of the following: Proteobacteria and Tenericutes at the phylum level; Gammaprotobacteria, Mollicutes and Coriobacteria at the class level; Enterobacteriales and Coriobacteriales at the order level; Enterobacteriaceae, Acidaminococcaceae, Christensenellaceae, and Eggerthellaceae at the family level; unidentified Enterobacteriaceae, unidentified Ruminococcaceae, Phascolarctobacterium, Intestinimonas, Bilophia, Anaerostipes, Butyricicoccus at the genus level; and Escherichia coli, Ruminococcus bicirculans, Alistipes shahii, Ruminococcus bromii, Blautia obeum, Bifidobacterium dentium, Parabacteroides goldsteinii, Collinsella aerofaciens, Eubacterium hallii, and Marseillibacter massiliensis at the species level (all P < 0.05). All the above bacteria were more abundant in Group B compared with Group A.
In addition, we investigated the relationships between the alteration of gut microbiota and the D-value of clinical parameters before and after the 3 months application of roxadustat including Hb, inflammatory factors, and iron-metabolism indices, using Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis (Table 6). The correlation heatmap figure is presented in Fig. 6. The abundance of Alistipes shahii was significantly negatively correlated with IL-6 (R = − 0.41371) and TNF-α (R = − 0.37232) (both P < 0.05).
Discussion
The current study showed that Hb and EPO levels were increased after the administration of roxadustat in patients with ESA resistance undergoing maintenance HD. Roxadustat regulated the levels of inflammatory factors, increased iron utilization, and altered the diversity and abundance of the gut microbiota, especially in terms of SCFA-producing bacteria, thus alleviating ESA resistance.
In line with previous studies, roxadustat can effectively treat patients with renal anemia in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [28, 29]. Numerous clinical trials have shown the advantage of roxadustat compared with epoetin alfa [30]. The mechanism of roxadustat involves stimulating the manufacture of endogenous EPO, improving iron utilization [31] (indicated by suppression of hepatic hepcidin and upregulation of transport genes related to iron metabolism, such as DCYTB, DMT1, and TF), and reducing inflammation. Roxadustat is known to adjust the inflammatory microenvironment and ameliorate disorders of iron metabolism (the two main characteristics of renal anemia) in CKD patients, especially those with ESA resistance [3, 32,33,34,35]. Notably, our results showed a dramatic change in the gut microbiota after the administration of roxadustat, particularly characterized by an increase in SCFA-producing bacteria. Meanwhile, our study showed the abundance of Alistipes shahii was negatively correlated with IL-6 and TNF-α levels. Alistipes shahii, known as SCFAs-producing bacteria, can significantly increase acetate and propionate so that relieve the bowel inflammation [36]. These results thus suggest that roxadustat may alleviate ESA resistance by regulating the gut microbiota.
CKD is considered to be a chronic inflammatory condition [37, 38] and to be closely linked to the gut microbiota [39, 40]. There is growing acceptance that the gut microbiota and its products affect the pathogenesis and development of CKD. Several factors, such as toxin accumulation [41,42,43], inflammatory status, drugs (corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, antibiotics), and dietary restrictions may affect the gut microbiota [44]. Recent studies found differences in the composition and function of the gut microbiota between dialysis patients with ESRD and healthy controls [45,46,47]. Jiang et al. found that butyrate-producing microbiota, such as Roseburia spp. and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, were significantly decreased in patients with any stage of CKD (n = 65) compared with healthy controls (n = 20) in a study in China. Wong et al. compared patients with ESRD (n = 24) and healthy controls (n = 12) in the United States, and showed that SCFAs played a dominant role in the gut microbiota related to uremic toxins in ESRD patients. Nineteen microbial families were increased, including 12 with urease-producing enzymes, five with uricase, and four with indole and p-cresol-producing enzymes, while four microbial families, including two with butyrate-producing enzymes, were decreased. Zhao et al. conducted a systematic review [48] of gut microbiota in patients with CKD, which showed significant increases in bacterial families possessing urease, uricase, and indole and p-cresol forming enzymes, and decreases in families possessing butyrate-forming enzymes among ESRD patients [49]. Previous studies comparing the intestinal flora between ESRD patients and healthy controls showed decreases in bacteria producing SCFAs, especially butyrate, in ESRD patients [48, 50]. Notably, however, the current study indicated that SCFA-producing bacteria increased after the administration of roxadustat. We thus speculated that the inflammatory and toxic microenvironment in patients with ESRD may be closely linked to the gut microbiota, which may play a dominant role in regulating ESA resistance.
Our results showed that SCFA-producing bacteria and serum SCFAs were increased and inflammatory factors were decreased after the administration of roxadustat. As an HIF-PHI, roxadustat can activate the HIF/PHD oxygen-sensing pathway, thus inducing the expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α. HIF-1α has an anti-inflammatory effect while HIF-2α affects iron utilization.
Recent studies have highlighted the prominent role of HIF-1α in maintaining intestinal homeostasis, not only by regulating the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier but also improving the survival of intestinal microorganisms [11]. The intestinal lumen in mammals is characterized by a hypoxic environment, which can induce the expression of several HIF-1 target genes in intestinal epithelial cells. Thus HIF-1α up-regulates genes involved in intestinal barrier function, such as MUC2, ITF, CLDN1, and other tight-junction proteins, and down-regulates nuclear factor (NF)-κB signal transduction and the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines to exert an immunosuppressive effect [51]. HIF-1α induced the development of SCFA-producing bacteria, which are key to maintaining intestinal homeostasis. First, SCFAs especially butyrate, provides the energy framework of colon cells [52, 53], also plays a crucial role in maintaining intestinal epithelial integrity, which is related to its ability to produce mucin and tight-junction proteins [54,55,56]. Second, SCFAs, as a major mode of communication between the microbiota and host cells, have demonstrated several immunomodulatory effects [57]. SCFAs have anti-inflammatory effects by reducing the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and possibly reducing local macrophage infiltration. SCFAs also exert anti-inflammatory effects through inhibition of NF-κB activation in the host immune cells by binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPRs) 43 and 41 [58,59,60]. In addition, SCFAs epigenetically regulates gene expression by inhibiting histone deacetylases, which can induce the differentiation of colonic Treg cells [61], and can also improve the host response to inflammation [62, 63]. These functions may also be conducive to the survival of the intestinal flora and may promote the interaction between the host and gut microorganisms. Meanwhile, the abundance of E. coli increased after Roxadustat treatment. In present, the function of E. coli of chronic kidney disease is still inexplicit. There is now substantial research showing that the E. coli is more abundant in patients with ESRD [17, 19, 64] and it may produce protein-bound uraemic toxins (PBUTs), such as indoxyl sulfate (IS) and p-cresyl sulfate (PCS) [65]. In vitro, the level of E. coli was elevated after the application of rhuEPO. Thus, the upregulation of E. coli after roxadustat treatment maybe a result of the promotion of EPO [66]. The function of E. coli in ESRD patients is an unsettled question and need further study.
HIF-1 was first identified as a transcription factor regulating EPO in human hepatoma cells, while in vivo hypoxic stimulation of EPO and erythropoiesis is primarily mediated by HIF-2 [67,68,69]. Intestinal iron absorption has recently been shown to be mainly regulated by HIF-2α, which is an oxygen- and iron-regulated transcription factor that directly targets the three key intestinal iron transporters: divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1), duodenal cytochrome b, and ferroportin (FPN) [15]. In the hypoxic environment of the duodenum, HIF-2α upregulates the expression of apical (DMT1) and basolateral (FPN) enterocyte iron transporters, thus improving iron absorption [70]. The importance of hypoxia signaling and the essential role of HIF-2α in iron homeostasis have been highlighted in several genetic and pathophysiologic mouse models [12]. These models showed that the gut microbiota regulates systemic iron homeostasis in the host in two ways: by repressing intestinal iron-absorption pathways via the inhibition of basal HIF-2α function, and by promoting cellular iron storage via the induction of FTN expression. The host iron-sensing mechanism is intimately connected to and regulated by the gut microbiome. The present study showed that hepcidin, ferritin, TIBC, and UIBC all decreased after the administration of roxadustat, indicating improved iron utilization. This could partly explain the reduced demand for iron in patients with renal anemia treated with roxadustat compared with ESAs. Hepcidin is a key regulator of iron absorption [71]. The commensal microbiota could regulate hepcidin expression during intestinal inflammation via STAT3 activation and modulation of erythropoietic activity [72]. Roxadustat could thus improve anemia by affecting iron metabolism, and especially by reducing hepcidin levels [73]. We, therefore, considered that roxadustat might correct ESA resistance via activation of HIF-2α to improve iron utilization.
Our study had several strengths. First, to the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to explore the effects of roxadustat on the gut microbiota in patients with renal anemia and ESA resistance undergoing maintenance HD. The results thus provide a basis for further studies to explore the mechanism of roxadustat for the treatment of renal anemia. Second, this was a before–after control study, which thus eliminated the potential effects of individual differences and other confounding factors on the results, whilst ensuring the accuracy of the results and reducing the sample size, with high statistical efficiency.
The study also had some limitations. First, the limited data meant that the study may have been influenced by some unmeasured confounders, such as exercise, diet, and sleep information. These factors could also affect the gut microbiota [74,75,76], with potential implications for health. Second, although our results indicated that roxadustat significantly altered the gut microbiota, the species accumulation box plot suggested that the sample size was relatively limited. Further studies with larger sample sizes are therefore required. Third, the study enrolled patients from a single dialysis center, thus limiting the generalizability of the results to the overall HD population. Further studies are, therefore, needed to verify the current results.
Conclusions
Roxadustat alleviated renal anemia in patients with ESA resistance by decreasing inflammatory factors and hepcidin levels and improving iron utilization. These effects were at least partly mediated by improved diversity and abundance of SCFA-producing gut bacteria, probably via activation of HIF.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Dowling TC. Prevalence, etiology, and consequences of anemia and clinical and economic benefits of anemia correction in patients with chronic kidney disease: an overview. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(13 Suppl 8):S3–7, S23–25.
Nakhoul G, Simon JF. Anemia of chronic kidney disease: treat it, but not too aggressively. Clevel Clin J Med. 2016;83(8):613–24.
Babitt JLLH. Mechanisms of anemia in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(10):1631–4.
Chapter 2: Use of iron to treat anemia in CKD. Kidney International Supplements. 2012;2(4):292–8.
Chapter 3: Use of ESAs and other agents**excluding iron which is discussed in Chapter 2, to treat anemia in CKD. Kidney International Supplements. 2012;2(4):299–310.
Kanbay M, Perazella MA, Kasapoglu B, et al. Erythropoiesis stimulatory agent- resistant anemia in dialysis patients: review of causes and management. Blood Purif. 2010;29(1):1–12.
Del VL, Locatelli F. Investigational hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHI) for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2018;27(7):613–21.
Locatelli F, Fishbane S, Block GA, et al. Targeting hypoxia-inducible factors for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease patients. Am J Nephrol. 2017;45(3):187–99.
Kaelin WJ, Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol Cell. 2008;30(4):393–402.
Lee JW, Bae SH, Jeong JW, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1) alpha: its protein stability and biological functions. Exp Mol Med. 2004;36(1):1–12.
Fan D, Coughlin LA, Neubauer MM, et al. Activation of HIF-1α and LL-37 by commensal bacteria inhibits Candida albicans colonization. Nat Med. 2015;21(7):808–14.
Das NK, Schwartz AJ, Barthel G, et al. Microbial metabolite signaling is required for systemic iron homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2020;31(1):115–30.
Zhang H, Guo Q, Wang Y, et al. The efficiency of the posterior-only approach using shaped titanium mesh cage for the surgical treatment of spine tuberculosis in children: a preliminary study. J Orthop Surg. 2018;26(3):920440156.
Shah YM, Matsubara T, Ito S, et al. Intestinal hypoxia-inducible transcription factors are essential for iron absorption following iron deficiency. Cell Metab. 2009;9(2):152–64.
Taylor M, Qu A, Anderson ER, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2α mediates the adaptive increase of intestinal ferroportin during iron deficiency in mice. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(7):2044–55.
Singhal R, Mitta SR, Das NK, et al. HIF-2α activation potentiates oxidative cell death in colorectal cancers by increasing cellular iron. J Clin Investig. 2021;131(12): e143691.
Poesen R, Windey K, Neven E, et al. The influence of CKD on colonic microbial metabolism. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(5):1389–99.
Barrios C, Beaumont M, Pallister T, et al. Gut-microbiota-metabolite axis in early renal function decline. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8): e134311.
Vaziri ND, Wong J, Pahl M, et al. Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora. Kidney Int. 2013;83(2):308–15.
Yilmaz MI, Solak Y, Saglam M, et al. The relationship between IL-10 levels and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(7):1207–16.
Mafra D, Lobo JC, Barros AF, et al. Role of altered intestinal microbiota in systemic inflammation and cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(3):399–410.
Ritz E. Intestinal-renal syndrome: mirage or reality? Blood Purif. 2011;31(1–3):70–6.
Locatelli F, Aljama P, Barany P, et al. Revised European best practice guidelines for the management of anaemia in patients with chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(Suppl 2):i1–47.
Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993;4(5):1205–13.
Song Y, Westerhuis JA, Aben N, et al. Principal component analysis of binary genomics data. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20(1):317–29.
Ben SK, Ben AA. Principal component analysis (PCA). Tunis Med. 2021;99(4):383–9.
Serdar CC, Cihan M, Yücel D, Serdar MA. Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021;31(1): 010502.
Yan Z, Xu G. A novel choice to correct inflammation-induced anemia in CKD: oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor roxadustat. Front Med. 2020;7:393.
Groenendaal-van DMD, Kerbusch V, Kaspera R, et al. Effect of kidney function and dialysis on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of roxadustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2021;46(1):141–53.
Provenzano R, Shutov E, Eremeeva L, et al. Roxadustat for anemia in patients with end-stage renal disease incident to dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36(9):1717–30.
Gupta N, Wish JB. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors: a potential new treatment for anemia in patients with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69(6):815–26.
Santos-Silva A, Ribeiro S, Reis F, et al. Hepcidin in chronic kidney disease anemia. Vitam Horm. 2019;110:243–64.
Nangaku M, Eckardt KU. Pathogenesis of renal anemia. Semin Nephrol. 2006;26(4):261–8.
Dhillon S. Roxadustat: first global approval. Drugs. 2019;79(5):563–72.
Santos EJF, Dias RSC, Lima JFDB, et al. Erythropoietin resistance in patients with chronic kidney disease: current perspectives. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2020;13:231–7.
Parker BJ, Wearsch PA, Veloo A, et al. The genus Alistipes: gut bacteria with emerging implications to inflammation, cancer, and mental health. Front Immunol. 2020;11:906.
Weiss G, Goodnough LT. Anemia of chronic disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):1011–23.
Agarwal N, Prchal JT. Anemia of chronic disease (anemia of inflammation). Acta Haematol. 2009;122(2–3):103–8.
Anders HJ, Andersen K, Stecher B. The intestinal microbiota, a leaky gut, and abnormal immunity in kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2013;83(6):1010–6.
Ramezani A, Raj DS. The gut microbiome, kidney disease, and targeted interventions. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(4):657–70.
Meijers B, Evenepoel P, Anders HJ. Intestinal microbiome and fitness in kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15(9):531–45.
Hu X, Ouyang S, Xie Y, et al. Characterizing the gut microbiota in patients with chronic kidney disease. Postgrad Med. 2020;132(6):495–505.
Yang T, Richards EM, Pepine CJ, et al. The gut microbiota and the brain–gut–kidney axis in hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(7):442–56.
Simoes-Silva L, Araujo R, Pestana M, et al. The microbiome in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Pharmacol Res. 2018;130:143–51.
Gao B, Alonzo-Palma N, Brooks B, et al. A pilot study on the effect of prebiotic on host-microbial co-metabolism in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5(8):1309–15.
Crespo-Salgado J, Vehaskari VM, Stewart T, et al. Intestinal microbiota in pediatric patients with end stage renal disease: a Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium study. Microbiome. 2016;4(1):1–11.
Stadlbauer V, Horvath A, Ribitsch W, et al. Structural and functional differences in gut microbiome composition in patients undergoing haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–10.
Zhao J, Ning X, Liu B, et al. Specific alterations in gut microbiota in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review. Ren Fail. 2021;43(1):102–12.
Wong J, Piceno YM, DeSantis TZ, et al. Expansion of urease- and uricase-containing, indole- and p-cresol-forming and contraction of short-chain fatty acid-producing intestinal microbiota in ESRD. Am J Nephrol. 2014;39(3):230–7.
Jiang S, Xie S, Lv D, et al. Alteration of the gut microbiota in Chinese population with chronic kidney disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2870.
Kumar T, Pandey R, Chauhan NS. Hypoxia inducible factor-1α: the curator of gut homeostasis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:227.
Lee SM, Donaldson GP, Mikulski Z, et al. Bacterial colonization factors control specificity and stability of the gut microbiota. Nature. 2013;501(7467):426–9.
Chatzidaki-Livanis M, Geva-Zatorsky N, Comstock LE. Bacteroides fragilis type VI secretion systems use novel effector and immunity proteins to antagonize human gut Bacteroidales species. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(13):3627–32.
Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes. 2016;7(3):189–200.
Canani RB. Potential beneficial effects of butyrate in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(12):1519.
Walker AW, Duncan SH, McWilliam LE, et al. pH and peptide supply can radically alter bacterial populations and short-chain fatty acid ratios within microbial communities from the human colon. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(7):3692–700.
Corrêa-Oliveira R, Fachi JL, Vieira A, et al. Regulation of immune cell function by short-chain fatty acids. Clin Transl Immunol. 2016;5(4): e73.
Säemann MD, Böhmig GA, Österreicher CH, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of sodium butyrate on human monocytes: potent inhibition of IL-12 and up-regulation of IL-10 production. FASEB J. 2000;14(15):2380–2.
Tedelind S, Westberg F, Kjerrulf M, et al. Anti-inflammatory properties of the short-chain fatty acids acetate and propionate: a study with relevance to inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(20):2826–32.
Saad MJA, Santos A, Prada PO. Linking gut microbiota and inflammation to obesity and insulin resistance. Physiology. 2016;31(4):283–93.
Furusawa Y, Obata Y, Hase K. Commensal microbiota regulates T cell fate decision in the gut. Semin Immunopathol. 2015;37(1):17–25.
Galvão I, Tavares LP, Corrêa RO, et al. The metabolic sensor GPR43 receptor plays a role in the control of Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in the lung. Front Immunol. 2018;9:142.
Vieira AT, Galvao I, Macia LM, et al. Dietary fiber and the short-chain fatty acid acetate promote resolution of neutrophilic inflammation in a model of gout in mice. J Leukoc Biol. 2017;101(1):275–84.
Rysz J, Franczyk B, Ławiński J, Olszewski R, Ciałkowska-Rysz A, Gluba-Brzózka A. The impact of CKD on uremic toxins and gut microbiota. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13(4):252.
Gryp T, Huys GRB, Joossens M, Van Biesen W, Glorieux G, Vaneechoutte M. Isolation and quantification of uremic toxin precursor-generating gut bacteria in chronic kidney disease patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6):1986.
Mittal A, Singh V, Chowdhary S, Moideen A, Kumar D, Maniar K, Bhattacharyya R, Banerjee D. The effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on bacterial growth: a dual-edged sword. Kidney Dis (Basel). 2019;5(2):81–90.
Rankin EB, Biju MP, Liu Q, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2 (HIF-2) regulates hepatic erythropoietin in vivo. J Clin Investig. 2007;117(4):1068–77.
Kapitsinou PP, Liu Q, Unger TL, et al. Hepatic HIF-2 regulates erythropoietic responses to hypoxia in renal anemia. Blood. 2010;116(16):3039–48.
Koury MJ, Haase VH. Anaemia in kidney disease: harnessing hypoxia responses for therapy. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015;11(7):394–410.
Mastrogiannaki M, Matak P, Peyssonnaux C. The gut in iron homeostasis: role of HIF-2 under normal and pathological conditions. Blood. 2013;122(6):885–92.
Malyszko J, Malyszko JS, Matuszkiewicz-Rowinska J. Hepcidin as a therapeutic target for anemia and inflammation associated with chronic kidney disease. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2019;23(5):407–21.
Shanmugam NKN, Trebicka E, Fu L, et al. Intestinal inflammation modulates expression of the iron-regulating hormone hepcidin depending on erythropoietic activity and the commensal microbiota. J Immunol. 2014;193(3):1398–407.
Chen N, Hao C, Liu B, et al. Roxadustat treatment for anemia in patients undergoing long-term dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(11):1011–22.
Matenchuk BA, Mandhane PJ, Kozyrskyj AL. Sleep, circadian rhythm, and gut microbiota. Sleep Med Rev. 2020;53: 101340.
Clarke SF, Murphy EF, O’Sullivan O, et al. Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity. Gut. 2014;63(12):1913–20.
Cotillard A, Kennedy SP, Kong LC, et al. Dietary intervention impact on gut microbial gene richness. Nature. 2013;500(7464):585–8.
Acknowledgements
We thank International Science Editing (http://www.internationalscienceediting.com) for editing this manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the Dalian Key Medical Specialty Dengfeng Project (No. 2022ZZ254) to Xiu-Nan Zhao; Applied Basic Research Project of Liaoning Province, China (No. 2023JH2/101300091) to Shu-Xin Liu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S-XL: study conceptualization and design; X-NZ: manuscript preparation; Z-ZW, L-LY: data collection and interpretation of data; SZ: analytic strategy. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocol was approved by the institutional medical ethics committee of the Dalian Municipal Central Hospital (No. YN2022-039-10). All participants were provided written informed consent before data collection. The present study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, XN., Liu, SX., Wang, ZZ. et al. Roxadustat alleviates the inflammatory status in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent resistance by increasing the short-chain fatty acids producing gut bacteria. Eur J Med Res 28, 230 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01179-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01179-3