Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between adiposity and facial aging: results from a Mendelian randomization study

European Journal of Medical Research volume 28, Article number: 350 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Skin, as a sociologically meaningful interface, has psychological implications different from other organs, particularly in the context of the global population aging. Growing evidence suggests that facial aging is associated with an increased risk of adiposity. Existing research, however, were observational, and while they may find some correlations, it is difficult to simply disentangle non-causal or reverse-causal links because these associations may be confounded or fail to accurately reflect true causative linkages.

Objectives

We conducted a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to examine the potential effect of facial aging on the risk of broad obesity and its three major adiposity indicators, including body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage (BF%) and waist circumference (WC).

Methods

Genetic instruments from IEU OpenGWAS project, one of the largest available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for facial aging (423,999 samples) were used to investigate the relation to broad obesity (32,858 cases, 65,839 controls). Using the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) technique, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with adiposity indicators (BMI (461,460 samples), BF% (454,633 samples), and WC (462,166 samples)) were investigated in relationship to facial aging. Further sensitivity analyses were performed, including Mendelian randomization-Egger (MR-Egger), weighted median estimates, and leave-one-out analysis, to evaluate the consistency of the results and related potential issues in MR studies.

Results

We identified strong and significant correlations between adiposity and facial aging in the 17 broad obesity-associated SNPs (IVW estimate of odds ratio OR = 1.020, 95% CI 1.010–1.029, P = 7.303e − 05), 458 BMI-associated SNPs (IVW estimate of odds ratio OR = 1.047, 95% CI 1.0357–1.058, P = 1.154e − 16),for the 395 BF%-associated SNPs (OR = 1.056, 95%CI 1.040–1.072,P = 7.617e − 12), or for the 374 WC-associated SNPs (OR = 1.072, 95% CI 1057–1.087,P = 1.229e − 23). A range of complementary methodologies have been employed to evaluate horizontal pleiotropy and related potential caveats occurring in MR research.

Conclusions

Using Mendelian randomization as an alternative approach to investigate causality, we found a causal relationship between adiposity and facial aging, which was statistically strong and significant.

Key Messages

  • Using a two-sample Mendelian randomization, we found a causal relationship between adiposity (and its three major adiposity indicators, including body mass index, body fat percentage and waist circumference) and facial aging, which was statistically strong and significant.

  • Among the three adiposity indicators, WC had a better casual association with facial aging, which indicated that subcutaneous fat may present a major contribution in facial aging compared with visceral fat.

  • More detailed causal relationship was revealed in negative results of subsequent multivariable MR analysis (three major adiposity indicators with facial aging) and two sample MR analysis between visceral/subcutaneous adipose tissue and facial aging.

Introduction

Adiposity is a worldwide major public health problem with an alarmingly increasing prevalence over the past 2 decades. Forty-two percent of adults in the United States are obese, and a total of 1.9 billion adults worldwide are overweight or obese, which continue to climb, represent a major health and economic burden [1]. During obesity, skin-resident and systemic adipose tissue derives secreted factors and increases inflammation and has detrimental impact on facial aging [2,3,4]. The consequences of obesity in the skin are underestimated. Increased body mass index puts great disserve to skin physiology, skin barrier, collagen structure, and wound healing process, triggering the possibility of skin cancer [5]. Skin, as a sociologically meaningful interface, has psychological implications different from other organs, which makes facial rejuvenation and skin health care particularly attractive in the context of the global population aging. With the popularization of health care knowledge and the improvement of living conditions, the life span of the general population has extended and the global population has aged, which leads to a major paradigm shift in the focus of medical research to preventing and managing aging and optimizing the overall healthy life span [6, 7]. The society is paying increasing attention to the treatment and early intervention of skin aging.

Growing data suggest that facial aging is linked to obesity, lowering quality of life, and compromising mental health [8, 9]. In 2007, Yosipovitch et al. highlighted the association between adiposity and dermatologic conditions [10]. Subsequently, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have validated these putative correlations between adiposity (mostly BMI used as an indicator) and face aging [6, 11]. However, previous studies are based on observational epidemiological designs, which are prone to reverse causation and unmeasured confounding [12]. Specifically, the independent roles of adipose tissue from different depots in the relationship between adiposity and facial aging are still unclear, which is crucial to improve the rejuvenation modalities. Mendelian randomization (MR) provides an alternative approach to investigate causality by using genetic variants as instrumental variables and thereby accounting for observational study bias [13,14,15]. Here, we provide an MR analysis of the relationship between face aging and obesity along with a more precise indicator.

Methods

UK Biobank is a large-scale biomedical database and research resource that contains detailed genetic and health data from over half a million UK individuals [16]. In UK Biobank, Participants were recruited from National Health Service central registries across the UK, with provided informed permission and the Northwest Multicenter Research Ethics Committee granted ethical approval. Considering the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) used to identify genetic instruments were predominantly based on European samples, our analysis exclusively included European subjects.

Adiposity measures were ascertained following standardized protocols [6, 17]. Weight was measured without shoes and heavy outer clothing and BF% were measured via a Tanita BC-418 MA body composition analyser. Height was measured with a Seca 202 height measure, and waist circumferences were obtained with a tape measure [6, 17]. BMI was computed using National Institutes of Health standard (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/educational/lose_wt/BMI/bmicalc.htm). BF% and WC’s GWAS data were output from GWAS pipeline using Phesant derived variables from UK Biobank [18]. As genetic instruments for BMI, BF%, and WC, we employed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) detected from the largest European descendant GWAS to date (458, 395, 374 near-independent SNPs, respectively) [17, 19].

Facial aging was conducted using data from the population-based UK Biobank. This deposit from which facial aging domain was obtained, provides full details of the genome-wide association study (GWAS) pipeline developed by the MRC-IEU for the full UK Biobank (version 3, March 2018) genetic data [20]. The method of this domain to determine perceived age based on questionnaire has been described previously [21, 22]. Subjective evaluations of facial aging were measured by the question: do people say that you look younger than you are, older than you are, about your age, do not know, and prefer not to answer?

MR analysis

The data on the necessary variables and the facial aging GWAS were harmonized by the separate chromosomes and positions. The five MR methods applied in the research have been described previously [23, 24]. The random-effects inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary estimator for the MR analysis [25], for it has a higher statistical power with the assumption that all SNPs are valid instrumental variables. The weighted median approach [26], MR-Egger regression [27], weighted mode method [28] and simple mode method were used as reciprocal analysis. To investigate whether any single SNP had a disproportionate effect on the overall results, IVW analyses were re-performed leaving out SNPs once a time. To investigate if the SNPs affected facial ageing but not through adiposity, horizontal pleiotropy analysis was applied and identified SNPs of heterogeneity were extracted separately for literature background check. The causal estimates would be regarded as heterogeneous if the p value for Cochran’s Q test was above 0.05 and I2 was above 0.25. Scatter plots, leave-one-out analysis plots, forest plots and funnel plots were created to visually assess the results.

All statistical analyses were conducted in R 3.6 and TwoSampleMR package [29]. R version 3.4.0 and RStudio 2022.07.2 both for MacOS, were used for all statistical analyses. The weighted median method was used to supplement the MR-Egger, in order to gain a further dependable estimation of the unproductive effect.

The present study only used publicly available summary-level statistics. No individual-level data were analyzed. Ethical approval therefore was not required.

Sensitivity analyses

Sensitivity analyses were applied, including heterogeneity and pleiotropy analysis, to rule out the potential that these SNPs influenced the Mendelian randomization studies. A leave-one-out analysis was also completed to determine whether any SNP-driven relationships existed.

Result

To establish the association between the SNP’s effect on the exposure (extensive adiposity and three adiposity markers) and the SNP’s effect on the outcome (facial aging), we contrasted the traditional IVW analysis with the MR egger analysis for potential horizontal pleiotropic correction.

Primary analysis for broad obesity

A significant association was found with facial aging for the 17 broad obesity-associated SNPs (IVW estimate of odds ratio OR = 1.020, 95% CI 1.010–1.029, P = 7.303e − 05). There was some evidence of heterogeneity in the SNP effects (Table 2). MR-PRESSO analysis identified five influential outlier which were the TFAP2B variant, rs987237 (outlier test p-value < 0.017), the faim2 variant rs7138803 (outlier test p-value = 0.153), the ETV5 variant rs9816226 (outlier test p-value = 0.493), a NEGR1 obesity locus rs7531118 (outlier test p-value < 0.017), and rs527248 (outlier test p-value = 0.017) which were also shown to be a clear outlier in both scatter and leave-one-out plots (Figs. 1 and 2). These genes all performed a strong linkage with adiposity. Therefore, we retained these SNPs without eliminating these outliers, considering this may be caused by the ethnic group and environment (such as sunshine time, air humidity and air quality) differences between representative samples in the databases of UK Biobank and IEU OpenGWAS.

Fig.1
figure 1

Scatter plot for the effects of SNPs on broad obesity and facial aging. IVW, inverse-variance weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization. The horizontal axis represents the effects of each genetic variant on broad obesity, and the vertical axis denotes the effects of each genetic variant on facial aging. The grey lines around the solid black points are the corresponding confidence intervals for the effects. The slopes of solid lines represent the estimates from IVW weighted median, weighted mode, single mode and MR-Egger regression analyses

Full size image
Fig.2
figure 2

Leave-one-out analysis for the estimates for broad obesity (A), BMI (B), BF% (C) and WC (D) on facial aging. More details of the vertical coordinate displayed Additional file 3

Full size image

Secondary analysis for adiposity indicators

Tables 1, 2, 3 and Figs. 2, 3 reveal the results. Significant and strong associations with facial aging were also reported for the 458 BMI-associated SNPs, for the 395 BF%-associated SNPs, and for the 374 WC-associated SNPs (Table 1, Figs. 4, 5). At a type one error of 5%, we had ≥ 95% power to detect a causal association of an odds ratio OR > 1 with BMI, BF% and WC. We detected OR > 1.05 for BF% and OR > 1.06 for WC with a power of > 95% (Table 1). Applying standard IVW analysis, we found evidence for effects of genetically instrumented facial ageing on BMI (OR = 1.047, 95% CI 1.036–1.058, P = 1.154e − 16)), BF% (OR = 1.056, 95%CI 1.040–1.072, P = 7.617e − 12), and WC (OR = 1.072, 95% CI 1057–1.087, P = 1.229e − 23), respectively (Table 1, Fig. 5). All five MR methods (IVW, weighted median, weighted mode, single mode, and MR-Egger) that were investigated showed nearly identical direction of the effect (Table 1).

Table 1 Mendelian randomization (MR) estimates for the relationship between genetically instrumented broad obesity, BMI, BF%, WC and facial aging
Full size table
Table 2 Heterogeneity analysis for the relationship between genetically instrumented broad obesity, BMI, BF%, WC and facial aging
Full size table
Table 3 Pleiotropy analysis for the relationship between genetically instrumented broad obesity, BMI, BF%, WC and facial aging
Full size table
Fig.3
figure 3

Funnel plot for the SNPs for broad obesity A, BMI (B), BF% C and WC D on facial aging

Full size image
Fig.4
figure 4

Forest plot for the estimates for broad obesity (A), BMI (B), BF% (C) and WC (D) on facial aging. More details of the vertical coordinate displayed Additional file 3

Full size image
Fig.5
figure 5

Scatter plot for the effects of SNPs on BMI (A), BF% (B) and WC (C) and facial aging

Full size image

All of the evaluated genetic factors for adiposity were found to be separately linked with face aging after multiple testing adjustment. Genetic pleiotropy does in fact cause causal bias, as shown by the clear statistical significance shown using MR-Egger regression analysis (Table 3). Low heterogeneity in the IVW estimate and MR-Egger regression was observed for all outcomes (BMI: Q-pval ≤ 1.425e − 86; BF% Q-pval ≤ 1.198e − 76; WC: Q-pval ≤ 8.828e − 66, Table 2). Our pleiotropy methods also indicated no relations of facial ageing to BMI, BF% or WC (0.500 ≤ p ≤ 0.980, Table 3). For further sensitivity analyses, we carried out leave-one-out analysis to assess whether the IVW estimate was driven by an individual SNP and performed positive and negative control outcome analyses. The leave-one-out analysis revealed that a single genetic marker was primarily responsible for the linked signals (Fig. 2).

Discussion

In the present study, for the first time, we examined the association of genetically predicted adiposity and facial aging in a large population-based cohort, the UK Biobank (as well as IEU OpenGWAS project applied in supplementary materials). By leveraging several MR estimation approaches, we found that longer genetically predicted obesity was associated with a more severe likelihood of facial aging. Our study, corroborating previous observational and experimental studies, provides further evidence to support a causal role of adiposity in facial aging. And to the best of our knowledge, no studies have used population-based cohorts to investigate the topic.

The difficulty in measuring face aging is one reason why there are so few research on this topic at the population level. For instance, although three-dimensional human face morphology evaluation devices [35], among others [36], can deliver objective and comprehensive characteristics for facial aging, aging researchers have not had widespread access to them due to their impracticability and high cost. A subjective evaluation of facial aging may prove helpful in overcoming the difficulties associated with measuring face aging and in maximizing the use of questionnaire-based tools [37]. That’s why we finally chose to use questionnaire-based measurements from the UK Biobank [38, 39]. The UK Biobank and IEU OpenGWAS projects’ high sample sizes have the potential to allay worries about measurement error for the evaluation of face aging based on questionnaires, which is a benefit of this sort of data.

Simultaneously, when discussing the potential risks of adiposity, people frequently refer to the involvement of adipose tissue. SAT plays an essential role in the regulation of skin homeostasis and rejuvenation [40, 41]. Laboratory studies showed that age-dependent regulatory cells (ARCs) in SAT increase in abundant after middle age and display high levels of pro-inflammatory markers, which may accelerate facial aging [42]. However, as limited publicly available databases, the facial ageing’s casualty with subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) cannot be detected with only two SNPs harvested from GWAS (Additional file 2).

Then we shifted our gaze to visceral adipose tissue (VAT). An UK Biobank-based MR research identified a link between genetically determined VAT accumulation and longevity, showing that visceral adiposity may be detrimental to systemic aging [43]. Based on this, we investigated VAT’s effects on the more localized facial aging. More detailed causal relationship was revealed in the negative results of multivariable MR analysis and two sample MR analysis between VAT and facial aging (Additional file 1). Among the three adiposity indicators, WC has a better casual association with facial aging (Additional file 1: Table S1) Then, a two sample MR analysis was implemented between VAT and facial aging. We observed that the OR per SD increase of VAT on facial ageing using the IVW method was 1.047 (95% CI − 0.002, 0.093) and P-value is greater than 0.05 among the five MR methods tested (Additional file 1: Table S2).

The primary and secondary effects of SAT and VAT on facial aging have not yet been verified. Although VAT has no anatomic advantage over SAT, considering that the increase of WC is more closely related to the accumulation of VAT, we suggested that the excessive VAT accumulation might also be involved in the aggravation of facial aging through multiple pathophysiological processes [46]. One the other hand, several researchers considered that white adipose tissue (WAT) in SAT can be a beneficial therapeutic target for facial aging. Subcutaneous WAT have a thick ‘skin’ confronting with the down-regulating behavior of aging-regulated RNA [47, 48]. Among a pairwise age group comparisons, only a few immune- and inflammation-associated genes are found to be differentially regulated in the skin compared to the brain and blood, indicating that subcutaneous WAT performs a better immunomodulatory capacity with typical inflammaging signs [49].

In addition, factors affecting facial aging are also very diverse. Novel results revealed a detrimental effect of heavier smoking on facial aging [50]. Another nonlinear analysis indicated a potential threshold relationship between alcohol intake and telomere length [51]. But there is still no MR evidence showing alcohol consumption or other unhealthy lifestyles have any direct causality with facial aging. There is also little statistical evidence suggesting whether factors of low-quality life (like poverty, disability, long-term UV exposure or air pollution exposure), and mental health (including depression and anxiety) trigger facial aging. We will continue to conduct studies on these topics.

Limitations

Despite the advantages of the large sample size, our study is prone to several limitations. First and foremost, in this study we performed reliable and meaningful estimations using a variety of MR methods. Adiposity can be used as a mediator to further investigate the underlying molecular causes of face aging. Simultaneously, it is also necessary to analyze data in more nuanced manners, such as grouping data according to race, gender and living habits, or applying more complex MR models to verify their direct or indirect associations. Second, although we have assumed a linear relationship between adiposity and facial aging in this study, we still do not know whether this is a direct linear causal relationship or indirect nonlinear relationship. Further research needs to be conducted by applying more complex MR models to verify their direct or indirect correlations. Third, considering there is few basic research with high hierarchy of evidence revealing the relationship between adiposity and facial aging or between subcutaneous adipose tissue and facial aging, our present findings need further replication in multicenter cohorts and basic research contained high-throughput sequencing analysis of human samples. Last but not least, as previously stated, the UK Biobank and IEU OpenGWAS research quantified face age using a single query, which could lead to measurement error. Future research is encouraged in order to create a more comprehensive questionnaire-based approach for measuring diverse aspects of facial aging. In this study, we performed reliable and meaningful estimations using a variety of MR methods. Adiposity can be used as a mediator to further investigate the underlying molecular causes of face aging. Simultaneously, it is also necessary to analyze data in more nuanced manners, such as grouping data according to race, gender and living habits, or applying more complex MR models to verify their direct or indirect associations.

Conclusions

Our study provides evidence that obesity-related risk drives facial ageing. Using Mendelian randomization, a greater adiposity genetic susceptibility was causally related to facial ageing when applying the genetic instruments from UK Biobank and IEU OpenGWAS project. Given the rapidly rising burden of obesity across the world, our findings have important implications for global health and esthetic skin rejuvenation.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from UK Biobank project site and IEU OpenGWAS project site, subject to successful registration and application process. Specifically the data of facial ageing, BMI, BF% and WC are from UK Biobank and the data of broad obesity is from the IEU OpenGWAS. Further details can be found at https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ or https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/.

Abbreviations

MR:

Mendelian randomization

BMI:

Body mass index

BF%:

Body fat percentage

WC:

Waist circumference

GWAS:

Genome-wide association studies

SNPs:

Single nucleotide polymorphisms

IVW:

Inverse-variance weighted

MR-Egger:

Mendelian randomization-Egger

SD:

Standard deviation

SE:

Standard error

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

VAT:

Visceral adipose tissue

SAT:

Subcutaneous adipose tissue

ARCs:

Age-dependent regulatory cells

WAT:

White adipose tissue

References

  1. Koenen M, Hill MA, Cohen P, et al. Obesity, adipose tissue and vascular dysfunction. Circ Res. 2021;128(7):951–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Von Bank H, Kirsh C, Simcox J. Aging adipose: Depot location dictates age-associated expansion and dysfunction. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;67: 101259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reyes-Farias M, Fos-Domenech J, Serra D, et al. White adipose tissue dysfunction in obesity and aging. Biochem Pharmacol. 2021;192: 114723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vijay J, Gauthier MF, Biswell RL, et al. Single-cell analysis of human adipose tissue identifies depot and disease specific cell types. Nat Metab. 2020;2(1):97–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirt PA, Castillo DE, Yosipovitch G, et al. Skin changes in the obese patient. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(5):1037–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourassa KJ, Moffitt TE, Ambler A, et al. Association of treatable health conditions during adolescence with accelerated aging at midlife. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(4):392–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruth KS, Day FR, Hussain J, et al. Genetic insights into biological mechanisms governing human ovarian ageing. Nature. 2021;596(7872):393–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Santos AL, Sinha S. Obesity and aging: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;67: 101268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang L, Yi Z. Obesity paradox and aging: visceral adiposity index and all-cause mortality in older individuals: a prospective cohort study. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13: 975209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yosipovitch G, Devore A, Dawn A. Obesity and the skin: skin physiology and skin manifestations of obesity. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56(6):901–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Valente DS, Braga Da Silva J, Cora Mottin C, et al. Influence of massive weight loss on the perception of facial age: the facial age perceptions cohort. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(4):481e–8e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Davey Smith G, Phillips AN. Correlation without a cause: an epidemiological odyssey. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(1):4–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu X, Zhao J, Lin Z, et al. Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(28): e2106858119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Burgess S, Foley CN, Zuber V. Inferring causal relationships between risk factors and outcomes from genome-wide association study data. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet. 2018;19:303–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Davey Smith G, Holmes MV, Davies NM, et al. Mendel’s laws, Mendelian randomization and causal inference in observational data: substantive and nomenclatural issues. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35(2):99–111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Barbour V. UK Biobank: a project in search of a protocol? Lancet. 2003;361(9370):1734–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu Y, Day FR, Gustafsson S, et al. New loci for body fat percentage reveal link between adiposity and cardiometabolic disease risk. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyon MS, Andrews SJ, Elsworth B, et al. The variant call format provides efficient and robust storage of GWAS summary statistics. Genome Biol. 2021;22(1):32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. !!! INVALID CITATION !!! .

  20. Ruth Mitchell E, BL, Mitchell, R, Raistrick, CA, Paternoster, L, Hemani, G, Gaunt, TR. MRC IEU UK Biobank GWAS pipeline version 2 [DS]. 2019,

  21. Zhan Y, Hagg S. Association between genetically predicted telomere length and facial skin aging in the UK biobank: a mendelian randomization study. Geroscience. 2021;43(3):1519–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang L, Zheng Z, Fang H, et al. A generalized linear mixed model association tool for biobank-scale data. Nat Genet. 2021;53(11):1616–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sekula P, Del Greco MF, Pattaro C, et al. Mendelian randomization as an approach to assess causality using observational data. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(11):3253–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hartwig FP, Borges MC, Horta BL, et al. Inflammatory biomarkers and risk of schizophrenia: a 2-sample mendelian randomization study. JAMA Psychiat. 2017;74(12):1226–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Burgess S, Scott RA, Timpson NJ, et al. Using published data in mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30(7):543–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, et al. Consistent estimation in mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016;40(4):304–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(2):512–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hartwig FP, Davey Smith G, Bowden J. Robust inference in summary data mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(6):1985–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife. 2018. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tomei S, Mamtani R, Al Ali R, et al. Obesity susceptibility loci in qataris, a highly consanguineous Arabian population. J Transl Med. 2015;13:119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Berenguer J, Jarrin I, Bellon JM, et al. Obesity-related SNPs and weight gain following first-line antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang HY, Chang SC, Lin WY, et al. Machine learning-based method for obesity risk evaluation using single-nucleotide polymorphisms derived from next-generation sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2018;25(12):1347–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zou X, Wang L, Xiao L, et al. Deciphering the irregular risk of stroke increased by obesity classes: a stratified mendelian randomization study. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12: 750999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bell CG, Gao F, Yuan W, et al. Obligatory and facilitative allelic variation in the DNA methylome within common disease-associated loci. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen W, Qian W, Wu G, et al. Three-dimensional human facial morphologies as robust aging markers. Cell Res. 2015;25(5):574–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Nanda V, Gutman B, Bar E, et al. Quantitative analysis of 3-dimensional facial soft tissue photographic images: technical methods and clinical application. Prog Orthod. 2015;16:21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Dykiert D, Bates TC, Gow AJ, et al. Predicting mortality from human faces. Psychosom Med. 2012;74(6):560–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tomlinson DJ, Erskine RM, Morse CI, et al. The combined effects of obesity and ageing on skeletal muscle function and tendon properties in vivo in men. Endocrine. 2021;72(2):411–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rexbye H, Petersen I, Johansens M, et al. Influence of environmental factors on facial ageing. Age Ageing. 2006;35(2):110–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shook BA, Wasko RR, Mano O, et al. Dermal adipocyte lipolysis and myofibroblast conversion are required for efficient skin repair. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26(6):880–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Crowley JS, Kream E, Fabi S, et al. Facial rejuvenation with fat grafting and fillers. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41(Suppl 1):S31–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nguyen HP, Lin F, Yi D, et al. Aging-dependent regulatory cells emerge in subcutaneous fat to inhibit adipogenesis. Dev Cell. 2021;56(10):1437–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Yan B, Yang J, Zhao B, et al. Causal effect of visceral adipose tissue accumulation on the human longevity: a mendelian randomization study. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12: 722187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rogers NH, Landa A, Park S, et al. Aging leads to a programmed loss of brown adipocytes in murine subcutaneous white adipose tissue. Aging Cell. 2012;11(6):1074–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Marcangeli V, Youssef L, Dulac M, et al. Impact of high-intensity interval training with or without l-citrulline on physical performance, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue in obese older adults. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(3):1526–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Palmer AK, Jensen MD. Metabolic changes in aging humans: current evidence and therapeutic strategies. J Clin Invest. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI158451.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou Q, Wan Q, Jiang Y, et al. A landscape of murine long non-coding RNAs reveals the leading transcriptome alterations in adipose tissue during aging. Cell Rep. 2020;31(8): 107694.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Trim WV, Walhin JP, Koumanov F, et al. Divergent immunometabolic changes in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle with ageing in healthy humans. J Physiol. 2022;600(4):921–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Srivastava A, Barth E, Ermolaeva MA, et al. Tissue-specific gene expression changes are associated with aging in mice. Genom Proteom Bioinform. 2020;18(4):430–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Millard LAC, Munafo MR, Tilling K, et al. MR-pheWAS with stratification and interaction: searching for the causal effects of smoking heaviness identified an effect on facial aging. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(10): e1008353.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Topiwala A, Taschler B, Ebmeier KP, et al. Alcohol consumption and telomere length: mendelian randomization clarifies alcohol’s effects. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27(10):4001–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (82002058).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou North Road, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Meiqi Liu & Jingwei Feng

Authors
  1. Meiqi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingwei Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ML: formal analysis-lead, investigation-lead, methodology-equal, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing-equal; JF: formal analysis-supporting, investigation-supporting, methodology-equal, writing—review and editing-equal.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingwei Feng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Multivariate Mendelian randomization (MR) estimates for the relationship between genetically instrumented board obesity, BMI, BF%, WC and facial aging. Table S2. Mendelian randomization (MR) estimates for the relationship between genetically instrumented VAT and facial aging. Table S3. Heterogeneity analysis for the relationship between genetically instrumented VAT and facial aging. Table S4. Pleiotropy analysis for the relationship between genetically instrumented VAT and facial aging. Fig. S1. Scatter plot for the effects of SNPs on VAT and facial aging. Fig. S2. Leave-one-out analysis for the estimates for VAT on facial aging. Fig. S3. Forest plot for the estimates for VAT on facial aging. Fig. S5. Funnel plot for the SNPs for VAT on facial aging

Additional file 2: Fig. S1.

Scatter plot for the effects of SNPs on SAT and facial aging. Fig. S2. Forest plot for the estimates for SAT on facial aging.

Additional file 3:

The original data of Leave-one-out analysis and Forest plots.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, M., Feng, J. Association between adiposity and facial aging: results from a Mendelian randomization study. Eur J Med Res 28, 350 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01236-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01236-x

European Journal of Medical Research

ISSN: 2047-783X

Contact us