Skip to main content
Download PDF

Sex differences in heart: from basics to clinics

European Journal of Medical Research volume 27, Article number: 241 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Sex differences exist in the structure and function of human heart. The patterns of ventricular repolarization in normal electrocardiograms (ECG) differ in men and women: men ECG pattern displays higher T-wave amplitude and increased ST angle. Generally, women have longer QT duration because of reduced repolarization reserve, and thus, women are more susceptible for the occurrence of torsades de pointes associated with drugs prolonging ventricular repolarization. Sex differences are also observed in the prevalence, penetrance and symptom severity, and also in the prognosis of cardiovascular disease. Generally, women live longer, have less clinical symptoms of cardiac diseases, and later onset of symptoms than men. Sex hormones also play an important role in regulating ventricular repolarization, suggesting that hormones directly influence various cellular functions and adrenergic regulation. From the clinical perspective, sex-based differences in heart physiology are widely recognized, but in daily practice, cardiac diseases are often underdiagnosed and untreated in the women. The underlying mechanisms of sex differences are, however, poorly understood. Here, we summarize sex-dependent differences in normal cardiac physiology, role of sex hormones, and differences in drug responses. Furthermore, we also discuss the importance of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in further understanding the mechanism of differences in women and men.

Highlights

  • Sex differences exist from the cardiac structure and function to the presentation and progression of cardiac diseases.

  • After puberty, QTC difference between boy and girls visible, but diminish with age and disappears after 75 years of age.

  • Sex hormones play an important role in the sex-specific differences mainly by affecting cardiac repolarization

  • Women have a higher risk of developing a special type of ventricular tachycardia associated with adverse effects of drugs that prolong ventricular repolarization time.

  • HiPSC-CMs offer a robust human-based platform for studying sex-specific drug responses and for studying the mechanisms of sex differences at cellular and tissue levels.

Introduction

Men and women have similar genetic materials except the amount and presence of sex chromosomes, but they differ in cardiac anatomy and physiology. However, sex-specific differences extend from cardiac structure and function to the presentation and progression of cardiac diseases, as recently reviewed by Shufelt et al. [1]. Men are generally more susceptible and at earlier age to cardiovascular diseases, such as coronary artery disease than women [2]. Typically, men develop heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, whereas women develop HF with preserved ejection fraction [3], and, men develop atrial fibrillation approximately 10 years earlier than women [4]. Furthermore, right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia has sex-specific triggers; for instance, arrhythmia is initiated by hormonal fluxes in women and exercise and/or stress in men [5]. Even though the age at diagnosis is significantly lower in men, women are usually more symptomatic at the time of diagnosis [6]. The most severe clinical manifestations, i.e., ventricular fibrillation or sudden cardiac death are 8–10 times more prevalent in men than in women [7], indicating that women have better outcomes for cardiovascular major events [8].

Although endogenous sex hormones play an important role in cardiac physiology, detailed reports on the mechanisms behind these sex differences remain unavailable. From the electrophysiological point of view, women exhibit higher beating rates and slower repolarization than men. The underlying differences have been observed at the level of individual cardiomyocytes (CMs). This has led to the comprehensive research interest in identifying the cellular mechanisms responsible for sex differences in CM function. Furthermore, men undergo greater cardiac remodeling with aging than women. However, owing to limited human-based research material, most of the studies identifying the key mechanisms underlying the sex differences are conducted in animals. Although these animal studies have depicted numerous meaningful reasons behind sex differences, their outcomes cannot be extrapolated directly to humans because of fundamental differences in animal and human cardiac physiology and estrous cycle [9]. In addition, studies about sex differences have many confounding variables that might affect the results such as diet, exercise, and environment. Most of these problems can be solved with the recent progress in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived CMs (hiPSC-CMs) [10], which are not only human-based but also enable conducting research on sex difference in a controlled environment.

This review aims to provide an overview of the currently known sex-specific differences in the cardiac electrophysiology at the organ and cellular levels. Additionally, the effect of sex hormones on ion channels is discussed as well as sex-specific differences in cardiovascular drug responses.

Normal heart and age

The normal structure and physiology of the heart differ in men and women, and these differences reach their peak after puberty.

Size and structure

For men and women, the left ventricular (LV) mass values are similar during infancy and childhood, suggesting an almost the same initial number of CMs [11]. The clear sex difference in LV mass is observed only after puberty, and male CMs undergo greater hypertrophy than female CMs [11]. Men have 25–38% greater LV mass because of larger LV chamber dimension and wall thickness [11, 12]. In both sexes, the posterior wall thickness, septal wall thickness, LV mass, and LV mass index increase with age, but their values remain significantly smaller in women from 20 to 80 years of age [12]. The level of CM apoptosis also influences sex-specific differences; a male heart undergoes a higher percentage of apoptosis of ventricular CMs [13]. Thus, aging is associated with a significant decrease in the absolute number of CMs in a male heart, but the cellular volume is increased (i.e., hypertrophy) [14, 15]. In the left and right ventricles of males, binucleated cells progressively increase in number, whereas mononucleated cells progressively reduce with age [15]. Such phenomena have not been observed in a women heart [15]. The reason for the number of CMs to remain similar in an aging women heart but because of the higher regenerative capacity of the CMs in a women heart but is unlikely because of the absence of CM apoptosis. Females’ hearts are generally smaller but in proportion to their smaller body size [16].

Cardiac functions

LV ejection fraction (LVEF) is one of the central measures of LV systolic function. LVEF is the fraction of chamber volume ejected in systole (stroke volume) in relation to ventricular blood volume at the end of diastole (end-diastolic volume). Reports on whether LVEF differs between men and women are still conflicting [17].

The Framingham Heart Offspring Study showed that LVEF is not different between men and women [18], whereas the Dallas Heart Study reported that women had larger LVEF than men with the same age range [17]. Another large population study demonstrated that LVEF increased with age in both sexes, but was generally larger in women [12, 19]. After indexing ventricular volumes to body size, women have larger LVEF than men with similar age [20]. LV response to exercise also differs between sexes. Although the LVEF is smaller in men than in women at rest, it is reportedly larger in men than in age-matched women during exercise [21, 22]. Conversely, the increase in the end-diastolic volume index is greater in women during exercise but smaller during rest [22]. Additionally, men have a greater exercise capacity than women, most likely because they have a larger LV volume [23].

Electrocardiogram and patterns

Electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most widely used clinical test to evaluate heart’s electrical activity. Atrial depolarization is seen as the P wave; subsequently, the right and left ventricles are depolarized, forming the QRS complex. The T-wave represents ventricular repolarization to the resting state. The normal QT interval depends on the heart rate, and it is typically corrected (QTC) using various correction formulas [24]. T-wave amplitude (TWA) is the highest peak of the T-wave. ST angle is the angle between the baseline and the first 80 ms of the ST segment. Similar to the QT interval, the JT interval is used to quantify the repolarization duration; it is defined as the time period of QT subtracted by QRS duration [25] (Fig. 1). In addition, QT dispersion is defined as the difference between the longest and shortest QT interval in different ECG leads.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sex differences in electrocardiogram (ECG). Interval between two consecutive Rs (RR), interval between Q and T wave (QT); interval between J and T wave (JT), rate-corrected QT interval (QTC,); angle of ST elevation (ST angle) and T-wave amplitude (TWA). Green and red ECGs from men and women, respectively

Full size image

Fetal heart rate examination at 20–36 weeks of age by echocardiography has revealed no sex-related differences [26]. Neonatal ECG has demonstrated that female babies have higher heart rates and shorter absolute values of the QT interval with a shorter cycle length, leading to a QTC similar to that in male babies [27]. Studies with boys and girls younger than 15 years of age have shown no differences in heart rate and QTC intervals [28, 29]. After puberty, the QTC interval drops by approximately 20 ms in men, whereas it remains unchanged in women, leading to a longer QTC in women irrespective of the correction methods [24, 29]. The QTC gradually increases in men, and the correlation between age and QTC is greater in men than in women [24]. Therefore, the QTC differences between sexes are greater at younger ages, diminish with age, and disappear after 75 years of age [24, 28]. Furthermore, aging modulates the dispersion of ventricular repolarization; the older the individuals, the higher the QTC dispersion, which may contribute to cardiac mortality in old population [30]. Although QTC dispersion in young and middle-age shows no sex differences, it has been reported to be higher in older men than in older women (≥ 70 years old) [30, 31]. Sex differences are observed not only in cardiac repolarization, but also in ECG patterns (Fig. 1). Typical male and female patterns are readily recognizable in most ECGs without measurements. Male ECGs exhibit a higher J point, i.e., the level at which repolarization starts, a steeper ST segment (angle of the ST segment), and a greater TWA than female ECGs [25, 28]. Greater levels of J point and steepness of the ST angle segment in men implies a faster velocity of initial repolarization and typical early depolarization pattern [25]. During the period in which QTC is longer in women, the distribution of men and women ECG patterns also shows differences [25, 28]. All these repolarization variables correlate negatively with age in men but not in women [25]. However, increasing age is associated with a higher heart rate and a shorter mean RR interval only in women [31,32,33]; this association is caused by differences in ambient autonomic tone [23]. In addition, the slopes of the linear relationship between the absolute values of QT and RR intervals are steeper in women, indicating that women have longer QT intervals than men at a decreased heart rate and that sex difference in QTC is more marked at a longer cycle [33]. However, sex difference in QTC is absent at a shorter cycle [33], possibly because women shorten their QT interval more than men in response heart rate increase [34].

In conclusion, sex differences in ECG and its patterns are apparent only after puberty. Men exhibit a shorter and faster repolarization after puberty until approximately 75 years of age. In both sexes, QTC prolongs and ECG pattern changes with age, but these changes are more prominent in men than in women. Older men (> 70 years old) have a higher risk for ventricular arrhythmia at least partially due to higher QTC dispersion.

Effect of sex hormones and menstrual cycle

Generally, women have significantly longer QTC intervals because men begin to shorten their QTC interval after puberty [29]. The different testosterone levels may explain the differences in QT interval between sexes, since testosterone accelerates ventricular repolarization [35, 36]. In addition, free testosterone at physiological levels inversely correlate with QT interval in men but not in women [35, 36]. Castrated males had longer rate-corrected JT intervals (JTC) and less steep ST-segments than non-castrated males, further supporting the role of testosterone on the configuration and duration of ventricular repolarization [37]. Furthermore, the age-dependent changes in male ECG pattern tend to correlate with the rise in testosterone level during puberty and the decline in older males [28].

Unlike testosterone, estrogen does not have clear effects on the duration and pattern of cardiac repolarization in humans [36]. Bilateral oophorectomy does not induce any ECG changes in postmenopausal females, but it increases the mean duration and decreases the amplitude of the T-wave in premenopausal women [38]. An estrogen does not alter the heart rate, QTC or JTC in resting condition, but estrogen-deficient state increases the QT interval dispersion, which decreases after hormonal replacement therapy suggesting the protective role of estrogen against severe ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death [39,40,41]. However, hormone replacement therapy with estrogen increases the QT interval dispersion during peak exercise [41]. When combined with progesterone, the QTC interval does not increase, suggesting that progesterone reverses estrogen-induced QT prolongation [42]. Additionally, females with long QT syndrome (LQTS) have a lower risk for cardiac events during pregnancy, when the progesterone level increases [43]. However, the risk suddenly increases at postpartum, when the progesterone level decreases, also suggesting the protective role of progesterone [43]. In the menstrual cycle, the estrogen and progesterone levels change; estrogen levels gradually increase during the follicular phase, reach a peak after 11–13 days, and then decrease during the luteal phase, while progesterone levels do not increase until the luteal phase. Results about the effect of these hormonal changes on ECG and heart rate are still inconsistent [44,45,46,47].

In short, sex hormones, especially testosterone play an important role for the hormonal factor of the sex-specific differences mainly by affecting cardiac repolarization.

Cellular level

Several studies have revealed that sex differences exist already at the cellular level. However, due to limited availability of human samples, most of the experiments have been conducted with animal models such as rodent and canine models. With the help of hiPSC technology, information about sex-specific differences in humans at the CMs level can be obtained.

Contractility and excitation–contraction coupling

Cyclic changes in intracellular calcium (Ca2+) concentration regulate cardiac contractility. The Ca2+ influx through the L-type Ca2+ channels triggers the opening of ryanodine receptors (RyR2s), and subsequent release of Ca2+ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). This phenomenon gives rise to Ca2+ transients, referring to the process called Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release [48]. When the intracellular Ca2+ level increases, Ca2+ binds to myofilaments (troponin C), causing CM contraction. Relaxation occurs when the majority of Ca2+ is transferred back into the SR via the SR Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA), while a smaller amount of Ca2+ is extruded from the cell predominantly by the sodium (Na+)/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) [48].

At the cellular level, sex differences are observed in excitation–contraction coupling (ECC). Table 1 compares the intracellular Ca2+ handling properties between female and male CMs of different species. Several experimental results have shown that the CMs from female heart samples exhibit a smaller contraction along with longer time both to maximal/peak shortening and to 50% relaxation [49,50,51,52,53]. CM contractility depends not only on the myofilaments properties, but also on the diastolic and systolic Ca2+levels. The smaller contraction in female CMs arises from the smaller Ca2+ transient amplitude and/or lower diastolic Ca2+ levels in female CMs [49,50,51,52,53,54]. Another characteristic of female CMs is the slower rate of rise and decay of Ca2+ transient, corresponding to a longer time to peak shortening and the slower time to 50% relaxation [49, 50].

Table 1 Intracellular Ca2+ handling properties in female cardiomyocytes compared to male cardiomyocytes
Full size table

Smaller and slower rise of Ca2+ transient in female CMs implies reduced RyR2 activity, while a slower decay is due to reduced SERCA and/or NCX activity. Ca2+ content in SR is the same in male and female CMs and thus this does not explain the smaller Ca2+ release in female CMs [50, 54]. Actually, SR Ca2+ content has even been found to be higher in female CMs in one study [55]. The protein levels of SERCA, phospholamban (PLB), and calsequestrin show no sex differences [56, 57]. However, the protein and mRNA levels of RyR2 and NCX are higher in female hearts [57]. Thus, the altered intracellular Ca2+ handling in female CMs is not caused by the SR Ca2+ content and Ca2+ handling protein levels. Individual SR Ca2+ release units known as Ca2+ sparks may partly explain for this disparity. Female CMs have smaller Ca2+ spark amplitudes and durations (time to peak and decay time) [50, 54]. Furthermore, the degree of amplification of Ca2+ influx to the resulting amount of Ca2+ released from the SR can be quantified as ECC gain, which indicates the ratio of the amount of SR Ca2+ released per unit of L-type Ca2+ current (ICaL). In female CMs, the EEC gain is weaker, demonstrating that the amount of Ca2+ release per unit ICaL is lower in female CMs [53, 55]. Therefore, the smaller Ca2+ transient amplitude in female CMs is more likely to be caused by reduced Ca2+ influx trigger with a consequent reduction in SR Ca2+ release [49]. Aging also affects the sex differences in ECC [51, 52]. The fractional shortening, ICaL, and Ca2+ transients are reduced only in the CMs of older male mice, whereas SR Ca2+ content is increased in the CMs of older female mice [51]. Moreover, the Ca2+ sensitivity of myofilaments declines with age in male CMs, causing smaller contractions in older male CMs [52]. Therefore, despite that younger female CMs demonstrate smaller contractions, Ca2+ transient amplitude, diastolic Ca2+, and ECC gain, such differences vanish as the age advances [51, 52]. In addition, intracellular signaling and/or sex hormones play an important role in the regulation of intracellular Ca2+ handling, which engender sex-specific differences, as described below.

Taken together, the ECC in CMs depends on both sex and age, and the age-related alterations are more prominent in males than in females. Of note, smaller Ca2+ sparks and lower ECC gain are fundamental characteristics of female CMs. The marked reduction in ECC gain in female CMs may limit SR Ca2+ release under physiological conditions of stress such as exercise; this may explain why females are less capable of increasing LVEF under stress or exercise than males.

Action potential and ionic currents

Sex differences have been observed in action potential (AP) parameters and ionic currents and are strongly dependent on the species and origin of CMs within the ventricular wall (Table 2). In some animal studies, AP duration (APD) is longer in female CMs than in male CMs [55, 58,59,60,61], but other studies found no sex difference in APD [50, 53, 62, 63]. Xiao and coworkers examined sex differences at three transmural levels in dogs and demonstrated that APD was only significantly longer in the mid-myocardium of female dogs; the epicardium and endocardium showed no sex differences [64]. The resting membrane potential (RMP) [50, 53, 58, 60, 61, 63, 64], maximal upstroke velocity (dV/dt) [63], and AP amplitude (APA) [55, 63] are sex independent. Fast Na+ current (INa) is responsible for the rapid upstroke phase of AP. Although the INa densities in dog mid-myocardium do not differ in sexes [65], those in female endo/epicardium were significantly lower than those in male endo/epicardium [65].

Table 2 Action potential parameters and ionic currents in female cardiomyocytes compared to male cardiomyocytes
Full size table

Following rapid depolarization, transient outward potassium (K+) current (Ito) starts the repolarization of AP. The Ito densities are significantly lower in female mouse CMs [58] and in female dog endocardium than in male counterparts [64]. The ICaL is responsible for the plateau phase of AP. Female CMs from dogs [64] and guinea pigs [55] have increased ICaL densities. In contrast, James et al. showed that ICaL densities are decreased in female guinea pig CMs [59]. Furthermore, Sims and coworkers demonstrated significantly larger ICaL densities in CMs from the base of adult female rabbit hearts but found no difference between apical CMs [66]. As the plateau phase moves toward a more negative membrane potential, two types of K+ currents, namely, rapid rectifier K+ current (IKr) and slow rectifier K+ current (IKs), are activated. According to Liu et al., female rabbit CMs have significantly lower IKr densities than male rabbit CMs [67]. Zhu et al. also showed significantly lower IKs densities in female rabbit CMs [60]. Conversely, Xiao et al. demonstrated higher IKs densities in female dog epicardium and endocardium [64]. The ultra-rapid delayed rectifier K+ current (IKur) is mainly responsible for repolarization in mouse CMs, and IKur densities are significantly lower in female mouse CMs than in male CMs [61]. The inward rectifier K+ current (IK1) is activated during and after the repolarization phase to ensure terminal repolarization and stable RMP. The IK1 densities are significantly smaller in female guinea pig [59] and rabbit CMs [67]. Moreover, NCX current (INCX) densities are similar in sexes in pig [68] and rabbit atrial CMs [69] and CMs from the apex of a rabbit heart [70], but INCX densities are higher in female CMs from the base of a rabbit heart [70]. Verkerk et al. obtained human CMs from failing hearts and showed that female CMs have significantly longer APD and greater susceptibility to early after depolarization (EAD) [71]. In addition, female CMs express higher ICaL densities but smaller Ito densities than male CMs, but the APA, dV/dt, and RMP show no sex differences [71]. Gaborit et al. obtained CMs from healthy human hearts and demonstrated that female CMs express lower levels of various genes (human ether-a-go-go-related gene, mink, Kir2.3, Kv1.4, KChIP2, SUR2, and Kir6) responsible for cardiac repolarization [72].

Overall, many animal and human experiments have shown that APDs from female CMs are longer than that from male CMs, consistent with the clinical observation that women have longer QTc intervals. The cardiac AP results from the complex interplay of time- and voltage-dependent inward and outward ionic currents during AP’s various phases. The difference in APD between male and female CMs results from the unique composition of the ionic currents governing the APD. Furthermore, female CMs are more susceptible to EADs in response to increased cycle length, supporting the clinical observation that female sex is an independent risk factor for TdP [71].

Effect of beta-adrenergic stimulation

Adrenergic receptor activation is the primary mechanism that increases cardiac performances under stress. Upon beta-adrenergic activation, adrenergic receptors couple with G proteins, leading to adenylyl cyclase activation and secondary-messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production. Subsequently, cAMP activates protein kinase A (PKA), which promotes phosphorylation in various substrates, such as (i) L-type Ca2+ channel, which increases Ca2+ entry into cardiomyocytes; (ii) PLB, which accelerates Ca2+ sequestration into the SR and cardiac relaxation, and (iii) troponin I and C proteins, which reduce myofilament sensitivity to Ca2+ [73].

Male CMs exhibit higher beta-adrenergic receptor density and basal intracellular cAMP levels than female CMs; therefore, they have larger cAMP production upon beta-adrenergic stimulation [54, 74]. Furthermore, beta-adrenergic stimulation causes a larger augmentation of ICaL current densities, leading to increased Ca2+ release from SR, although basal SR Ca2+ content is similar between male and female CMs [49, 54, 56, 74]. The enhanced response to beta-adrenergic stimulation due to augmented intracellular signaling explains the larger positive inotropic effect in male CMs, as observed in both ventricular [74] and atrial CMs [75]. Additionally, the reduction in the decay time constant of the Ca2+ transient caused by beta-adrenergic stimulation is higher in the male heart than in the female heart, revealing that male hearts have a more pronounced lusitropic effect (i.e., relaxation) [76]. Even though the male and female hearts have similar Ca2+ transient durations after beta-adrenergic stimulation, APD reduction is less prominent in the female heart, as shown in the simultaneous optical mapping in ventricular AP and Ca2+ transient recording [76]. Voltage-clamp study revealed that beta-adrenergic stimulation induces smaller IKs in female CMs, suggesting the underlying mechanism behind the reduced capability of female CMs to further decrease in APD upon beta-adrenergic stimulation [60].

In conclusion, lower beta-adrenergic receptor density and/or lower intracellular cAMP level in female CMs attenuates the PKA phosphorylation of Ca2+ handling proteins and ion channels, which is the putative mechanism behind the limited positive inotropic effect under beta-adrenergic stimulation. The preserved beta-adrenergic regulation might be associated with reduced arrhythmic activity, explaining why women are less prone to severe arrhythmias [76].

Influence of sex hormones

The effect of sex hormones on cardiovascular physiology has been widely studied. CMs express sex hormone receptors, indicating that these hormones have direct cardiac effects [77,78,79]. At cellular level, sex hormones regulate various voltage-gated ion channels (Fig. 2) and also intracellular Ca2+ handling, thereby altering the cardiac repolarization [80].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Different voltage-gated ionic currents involved in action potential and influence of sex hormones in these ionic current. Ito, transient outward potassium current; ICa, calcium current; INa, sodium current; IKr/IKs, rapid/slow rectifier potassium current; IK1, inward rectifier potassium current

Full size image

Effect of sex hormones on ion channels

The effects of sex hormones on ion channels depend mainly on whether the hormone is present acutely or chronically (Fig. 3). The acute exposure of testosterone within the physiological range rapidly reduces the open probability of single ICaL and lowers ICaL current density [81]. It also decreases the APD mainly by enhancing IKs and suppressing ICaL via nitric oxide synthase 3 activation and nitric oxide production through a nongenomic pathway [82]. In contrast, the chronic treatment of testosterone increases the single-channel activity of ICaL and ICaL current density [81] and also INa current density [65]. Furthermore, testosterone upregulates the expression of genes for ICaL and NCX [83]. In female guinea pig CMs, the acute application of progesterone at 100 nM/L reduces APD mainly by enhancing IKs and inhibiting ICaL via a nongenomic pathway [84]. However, the supraphysiological concentration of progesterone (1–30 μM) in Langendorff-perfused female rabbit hearts exhibits a biphasic effect; it prolongs monophasic APD at lower concentrations (1–3 μM) but shortens at higher concentrations (10–30 μM) [85]. Moreover, high estradiol concentrations (1–30 μM) prolong the APD in a concentration-dependent manner by affecting one or more of the ionic currents, including ICaL, IKr, IKs, Ito, and IK1 [85, 86]. Estradiol can directly interact with ion channels without involving the membrane-associated estrogen receptors [87]. Of note, high estradiol concentrations prolong the APD by inhibiting IKr and IKs in female guinea pig CMs [88], but shorten it by inhibiting ICaL and delaying the recovery time of ICaL in male guinea pig CMs [89]. Therefore, while studying the effect of hormones on CMs, the sex of the animal from where CMs are isolated, should be considered. The estrogen of 300 nM concentrations shortens the APD by enhancing IKs and suppressing ICaL [90], but its physiological concentration (1 nM) prolongs the APD by suppressing IKr, with little or no effect on IKs and ICaL [90]. Furthermore, the incubation of CMs with estradiol (1 nM) enhances NCX current [70]. The plasma estrogen concentration is one of the key players in determining outward K+ current density thus, it affects the ventricular repolarization, as confirmed by reduced total outward K+ current densities and downregulation of K+ channel transcript level in female CMs [91, 92]. The long-term deficiency of ovarian hormones after ovariectomy results in higher ICaL, creating a larger “window” current that facilitates the increased occurrence of arrhythmias with and without isoprenaline in female guinea pig CMs [93]. However, in same study, the estradiol replacement prevents arrhythmias in CMs from ovariectomized guinea pig [93].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of gonadectomy in excitation–contraction coupling. Red arrows represent the effect of gonadectomy in women and green color represents the effect of gonadectomy in men

Full size image

In conclusion, sex hormones directly regulate ion channels and alter APD depending on their concentrations and whether the exposures are short or long. The long-term exposure of sex hormones acts via a genomic pathway, in which sex hormones bind to sex hormone receptors, translocate into nucleus and lead to the transcriptional regulation of ion channels [81, 94]. In addition, sex hormones can also directly targets the ion channels in a receptor-independent manner and referred as nongenomic regulation [81, 94]. Nongenomic actions can be distinguished from genomic effects by a more rapid onset (seconds to minutes), take place outside the cell nucleus via the activation of intracellular signaling including endothelial nitric oxide synthase and mitogen-activated protein kinase, and the fact that observed effects may not be blocked by sex hormone receptor antagonists [81, 94].

Effect of sex hormones on intracellular Ca2+ handling and contractility

The sex hormones also modulate the intracellular Ca2+ handling and contractile properties of CMs depending on acute or chronic application of hormones (Fig. 3). Pretreatment of rat CMs with testosterone (100 nM) for 24–30 h increases the peak Ca2+ transients, frequency of Ca2+ sparks, and fractional shortening thus it improves the CM contractility without altering the SR Ca2+ load [81]. In contrast, the acute testosterone application decreases the frequency of Ca2+ sparks and reduces contractility in testosterone-pretreated rat CMs [81]. When testosterone (100 nM) is acutely applied to non-testosterone-pretreated neonatal rat CMs, the intracellular Ca2+ release from the intracellular storage is increased by elevating the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate level [95]. In isolated male rat ventricular CMs, 24-h exposure of testosterone (1 μM) increases the peak shortening and relaxation velocity and decreases the time to peak shortening; conversely, acute exposure has no effect on the contraction and relaxation properties [79]. Animal experiments on gonadal testosterone withdrawal (GDX) have been conducted to study the influence of endogenous gonadal testosterone on the regulation of the Ca2+ handling in the heart. Two weeks after GDX reduced Ca2+ transient amplitude and peak shortening of CMs, and slowed down the Ca2+ transient decay is observed in male rats; however, the effects were completely reversed by testosterone replacement [96]. The reduction of the mRNA levels for the genes of NCX and L-type Ca2+ channels is observed [97]. However, long-term testosterone deficiency (10 weeks after GDX) increases the NCX1 expression, but it does not change the expression of SERCA2a, CSQ2, or total PLB in male mice [98]. If male rats receive testosterone replacement 9 weeks after GDX, the contractility and Ca2+ transient amplitude increase as a result of high Ca2+ release from SR and more efficient Ca2+ reuptake through SERCA and removal via NCX [99].

Moreover, acute estradiol application at supraphysiological concentrations (10–30 μM) reduces the contraction and Ca2+ transient amplitude [89]; the estrogen-induced negative inotropic effect is not mediated via estrogen receptors in the membrane, but it is more on the direct inhibition of ICaL [87]. Ovariectomy in female animals results in higher Ca2+ transient amplitude, faster rise and decay of Ca2+ transient, higher SR Ca2+ content, greater ECC gain, and higher spark frequencies in isolated CMs [93, 100, 101]. Ovariectomy increases SR Ca2+ storage and promotes SR Ca2+ loading, thus resulting into the increased Ca2+ spark frequency in ovariectomized CMs [101]. Furthermore, CMs from an ovariectomized animal heart exhibit decreased peak shortening, reduced maximum shortening/relengthening velocity, and prolonged shortening/relengthening duration [102]. The slow intracellular Ca2+ clearing and elevated resting intracellular Ca2+ levels caused by SERCA/PLB protein downregulation may underlie the mechanism behind the estrogen deficiency-induced altered mechanical and intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis [102, 103]. The estradiol [93, 102, 104] or progesterone [103] replacement in ovariectomized female animals ameliorates the changes in contractile function and intracellular Ca2+ handling properties of CMs caused by ovariectomy. Estrogen deficiency promotes the intracellular Ca2+ dysregulation, reduces myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity, and alters the contractile function, causing the formation of a more proarrhythmic substrate in an aging female heart. Taken together, the sex hormones directly modulate the myocardial function which partially explain the sex-based differences in myocardial function and may help to determine the differential incidence and outcomes of cardiac disease conditions in men and women.

Cardiovascular drug responses

Women have a higher risk of developing a special type of ventricular tachycardia, TdP, associated with adverse effects of drugs that prolong ventricular repolarization time. This is due to several sex-specific differences in physiology, pharmacokinetics, and/or pharmacodynamics [105]. Typically, women not only have a longer QTC at baseline, but also have more prolonged QT intervals after taking drugs known to prolong cardiac repolarization (e.g., Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs), placing them at a higher risk for TdP [105]. However, the detailed mechanism of TdP remains poorly understood. One possible explanation could be that drug concentrations are higher in women because of their smaller body sizes. However, quinidine (Class Ia antiarrhythmic drug) causes greater QTC prolongation in women than in men, although its serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics are not different between men and women [106, 107]. Furthermore, d,l-sotalol (class III antiarrhythmic drugs) increases the mean heart rate in women, who also face a threefold increased risk of developing TdP [108]. One study demonstrated that d,l-sotalol could induce extreme JTC prolongation in women regardless of the baseline JTC [109]. In another study investigating dofetilide (class III antiarrhythmic drug) administration and creatinine clearance in age-matched men and women, more than half of women discontinued the drug or underwent dose reduction because of significant QTC prolongation [110]. The Digitalis Investigation Group evaluated the efficacy of digoxin therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) and found that women taking digoxin had a higher mortality rate, although women with HF, but without digoxin medication had a lower mortality risk than men [111].

The endogenous sex hormones also have a role in drug-induced QT prolongation. After ibutilide (class III antiarrhythmic drug) infusion, the QTC prolongation and TdP occurrence was higher in women than in men [112, 113]. However, the progesterone level inversely correlates with the mean ibutilide-induced QTC prolongation and ibutilide-induced QTC prolongation is shortest during the luteal phase compared with that during the menstrual and ovulation phases, suggesting the possible protective effect of progesterone [113]. Furthermore, drug response in genetic cardiac diseases also differs with sex. During beta-blocker treatment of LQT type 1 patients with similar QTC intervals, men have shorter QTC intervals than women [114]. Moreover, beta-blocker therapy reduces the cardiac event rates in women with LQT type 3 syndrome, but its efficacy in men is still inconclusive because of the low number of prior cardiac events [115]. Patients with Na+ loss-of-function condition exhibit cardiac conduction disturbances and could provoke Brugada syndrome. Women with Brugada syndrome show greater conduction intervals and QTC in response to Na+ channel blockers, even though their baseline ECG parameters are similar to those of men [116].

Several in vitro studies have been performed to understand sex-specific differences in drug responses, and the results are similar to those of in vivo studies. Animal studies showed that a female heart is more prone to TdP development subsequent to QT prolongation in response to E-4031 (IKr blocker) and 4-aminopyridine (Ito blocker) [66, 117]. Dofetilide (IKr blocker) administration induces greater APD prolongation, EAD incidence, and repolarization dispersion in CMs from female hearts [63]. In addition, CMs from a gonadectomized male heart have higher dofetilide-induced APD prolongation and the presence of EADs than those from a control male heart. Testosterone replacement in gonadectomized animals diminishes the effect of IKr blockers on QT and APD, whereas estrogen replacement increases blockers’ adverse effects such as a higher magnitude of drug-induced prolongation and EAD incidences [63, 92, 118].

In conclusion, women have larger drug-induced QTC prolongation than men, and sex hormones play an important role in cardiac repolarization. All these results suggest that female sex is an independent risk factor for increased cardiac side effects of various drugs, and women have especially an increased risk of developing TdP. Therefore, the QT interval in female patients receiving drugs with potential effects on cardiac repolarization should be monitored closely.

Potential of human stem cell-based approaches

Considering the limited human heart material for research, most of our knowledge about sex-specific differences relies on animal experiments. However, cardiac ion channels, Ca2+ handling components, and estrous cycle differ among species. Although animal experiments reveal interesting results, direct extrapolation of animal data to humans is not always possible because of several uncertainties. Insufficient human-based data extensively limit our understanding of sex-specific electrophysiology, and further studies with human-based experiments are urgently required. The recent methodological and technical advancements with iPSC technology offer a robust and human-based platform for studying human cardiomyocyte physiology and pathophysiology [119, 120] as well as for screening pharmacological compounds [121]. HiPSCs provide an unlimited source of human CMs, offering an accessible and robust platform to study sex-specific drug responses. One of their advantages is that they carry donor-specific genetic information, enabling researchers to study the mechanisms of sex differences in different genetic cardiac diseases. One limitation of currently used hiPSC-CMs is that their phenotype resembles embryonic CMs [122] warranting caution in interpretation of the results. However, hiPSC-CMs have been successfully used to investigate the influence of genetics and sex hormones on the gene expression of cardiac ion channels and function of CMs. Papp and coworkers were the first to study the effect of sex hormones in hiPSC-CMs; they found that estradiol increases the ICaL and NCX current densities in hiPSC-CMs obtained from a female donor, and it slightly increases the ICaL in male-origin hiPSC-CMs but does not affect current NCX densities [123]. In clinical studies, women are more vulnerable to drug-induced QT prolongation, and similarly, hiPSC-CMs from women are more sensitive to rate-corrected field potential duration (FPDc) prolongation and arrhythmia incidence induced by IKr blockers [124, 125]. Similar to the result obtained from healthy human hearts [72], male-origin hiPSC-CMs displayed KCNE1 upregulation [125], resulting in a greater response against IKs blockers [124, 125]. In addition, estradiol administration increases FPD in female-origin hiPSC-CMs, whereas testosterone shortens FPD/APD in male-origin hiPSC-CMs [124, 126], consistent with clinical observations in which the QTC interval is shortened in males after puberty [29].

In conclusion, the intrinsic properties based on sex reveal fundamentally different responses in male and female-derived cells, making the hiPSC-CMs a useful model to study the mechanisms of sex differences and they help in predicting drug-induced arrhythmias in men and women. Furthermore, hiPSC-CMs can be maintained in a culture for a long time, making hiPSC-CMs a suitable model to study both the acute and the chronic effects of sex hormones. Sex-specific hiPSC-CMs enable us to control the environmental variables to study the genetic, epigenetic, and/or hormonal variables. Additionally, experimental variables such as the timing and dosage of hormonal application can also be optimized. Therefore, the development of male and female cardiac models helps achieve the goal of personalized medicine based on innovations in human stem cell technology without ethical constraints.

Conclusions

Both animal and human studies demonstrate that sex differences exist and range from gene expression to cardiac physiology. The presentation and progression of different cardiac diseases also differ in sex; men and women with cardiac diseases having the same gene mutations often have different clinical outcomes. Arrhythmia incidence is also different between men and women, and female sex itself is an independent risk factor a special ventricular arrhythmia, TdP, due to both genetic and acquired LQTS. Sex differences are an important factor to be considered when analyzing symptoms, searching for diagnosis, and optimizing the treatment for cardiac diseases.

Sex-specific differences in CMs and cardiac functions are most prominent after puberty demonstrating that sex hormones play an important role for causing such differences. However, detailed mechanisms underlying these sex differences are still unclear. In many studies, sex is not considered at all, causing misinterpretation of the actual results. Increasing the number of female participants in all types of studies, including animal experiments as well as clinical trials, and incorporating the sex as a factor in the analysis are needed to broaden our understanding of sex differences. Furthermore, endogenous sex hormone levels also change with age in both men and women. Therefore, experimental studies should incorporate not only sex, but also the sex hormone levels.

Currently, the data on sex-based electrophysiological and pharmacological responses from human-based models are limited and most of our understanding is still based on animal models. Although animal studies have delivered important information about sex differences and drug responses, such results cannot be directly translated in humans, and many drug therapies have still poorer outcomes in clinical studies than what was expected in animal studies [9]. One of the main reasons for this discrepancy is that cardiac physiology in animals differs from that in humans. Studies about sex-specific differences of new drugs should be performed in the human-based models with iPSC-derived male and female CMs. In addition, the sex differences should be consolidated into all phases of drug development to introduce safe and efficient drug treatment. Studies involving humans are expensive and can pose participants at an increased risk for side effects. Human-based heart biopsies are also limited, yielding a narrower human-based platform for research. Recent advances in hiPSC-CMs offer a robust human-based platform not only for a large drug screening, but also for studying the mechanisms of sex differences at cellular and tissue levels.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AP:

Action potential

APA:

Action potential amplitude

APD:

Action potential duration

Ca2+ :

Calcium

cAMP:

Cyclic adenosine monophosphate

CMs:

Cardiomyocytes

dV/dt:

Upstroke velocity

ECC:

Excitation–contraction coupling

ECG:

Electrocardiograph

FPDc:

Rate-corrected field potential duration

HF:

Heart failure

hiPSC-CMs:

Human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes

I CaL :

L-type calcium current

I K1 :

Inward rectifier potassium current

I Kr :

Rapid delayed rectifier potassium current

I Ks :

Slow delayed rectifier potassium current

I Kur :

Ultra-rapid delayed rectifier potassium current

I Na :

Sodium current

I to :

Transient outward potassium current

JTC :

Rate-corrected JT interval

K+ :

Potassium

LQTS:

Long QT syndrome

LVEF:

Left ventricle ejection fraction

Na+ :

Sodium

NCX:

Sodium calcium exchanger

PKA:

Protein kinase A

PLB:

Phospholamban

QTC :

Rate-corrected QT intervals

RMP:

Resting membrane potential

RyR2:

Ryanodine receptor 2

SERCA:

Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase

SR:

Sarcoplasmic reticulum

TdP:

Torsades de pointes

TWA:

T-wave amplitude

VF:

Ventricular fibrillation

References

  1. Shufelt CL, Pacheco C, Tweet MS, Miller VM. Sex-specific physiology and cardiovascular disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1065:433–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139:e56-528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cleland JGF, Swedberg K, Cohen-solal A, Cosin-aguilar J, Dietz R, Mason J, et al. The Euro Heart Failure Survey of The EUROHEART Survey Programme a survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe. Eur J Heart Fail. 2000;2:123–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Magnussen C, Niiranen TJ, Ojeda FM, Gianfagna F, Blankenberg S, Njølstad I, et al. Sex differences and similarities in atrial fibrillation epidemiology, risk factors, and mortality in community cohorts: results from the biomarcare consortium (Biomarker for cardiovascular risk assessment in Europe). Circulation. 2017;136:1588–97.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marchlinski FE, Deely MP, Zado ES. Sex-specific triggers for right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia. Am Heart J. 2000;139:1009–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rowin EJ, Maron MS, Wells S, Patel PP, Koethe BC, Maron BJ. Impact of sex on clinical course and survival in the contemporary treatment era for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012041.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Antzelevitch C, Brugada P, Brugada J, Brugada R, Rahimtoola SH, Alpert JS, et al. Brugada syndrome: from cell to bedside. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2004.04.005.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cannatà A, Fabris E, Merlo M, Artico J, Gentile P, Pio Loco C, et al. Sex differences in the long-term prognosis of dilated cardiomyopathy. Can J Cardiol. 2019;36:37–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clauss S, Bleyer C, Schüttler D, Tomsits P, Renner S, Klymiuk N, et al. Animal models of arrhythmia: classic electrophysiology to genetically modified large animals. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16:457–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-019-0179-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lock R, Al Asafen H, Fleischer S, Tamargo M, Zhao Y, Radisic M, et al. A framework for developing sex-specific engineered heart models. Nat Rev Mater. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00381-1.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, Meyer RA. Gender differences in left ventricular growth. Hypertension. 1995;26:979–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gebhard C, Stähli BE, Gebhard CE, Tasnady H, Zihler D, Wischnewsky MB, et al. Age- and gender-dependent left ventricular remodeling. Echocardiography. 2013;30:1143–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mallat Z, Fornes P, Costagliola R, Esposito B, Belmin J, Lecomte D, et al. Age and gender effects on cardiomyocyte apoptosis in the normal human heart. J Gerontol Ser A. 2001;56:M719–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.11.M719.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olivetti G, Melissari M, Capasso JM, Anversa P. Cardiomyopathy of the aging human heart. Myocyte loss and reactive cellular hypertrophy. Circ Res. 1991;68:1560–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Olivetti G, Giordano G, Corradi D, Melissari M, Lagrasta C, Gambert SR, et al. Gender differences and aging: effects on the human heart. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1068–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Legato MJ, Leghe JK. Gender and the heart. Sex-specific differences in the normal myocardial anatomy and physiology. Principles of gender-specific medicine. 2010. p. 151–61.

  17. Chung AK, Das SR, Leonard D, Peshock RM, Kazi F, Abdullah SM, et al. Women have higher left ventricular ejection fractions than men independent of differences in left ventricular volume: the Dallas heart study. Circulation. 2006;113:1597–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Salton CJ, Chuang ML, O’Donnell CJ, Kupka MJ, Larson MG, Kissinger KV, et al. Gender differences and normal left ventricular anatomy in an adult population free of hypertension: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study of the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1055–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sorimachi H, Kurosawa K, Yoshida K, Obokata M, Noguchi T, Naka M, et al. Sex differences in left ventricular afterload and diastolic function are independent from the aortic size. PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0214907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayward CS, Kalnins WV, Kelly RP. Gender-related differences in left ventricular chamber function. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;49:340–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Merz CNB, Moriel M, Rozanski A, Klein J, Berman DS. Gender-related differences in exercise ventricular function among healthy subjects and patients. Am Heart J. 1996;131:704–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hanley PC, Zinsmeister AR, Clements IP, Bove AA, Brown ML, Gibbons RJ. Gender-related differences in cardiac response to supine exercise assessed by radionuclide angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:624–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Burke JH, Goldberger JJ, Ehlert FA, Kruse JT, Parker MA, Kadish AH. Gender differences in heart rate before and after autonomic blockade: evidence against an intrinsic gender effect. Am J Med. 1996;100:537–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rabkin SW, Cheng XBJ, Thompson DJS. Detailed analysis of the impact of age on the QT interval. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016;13:740–8.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bidoggia H, Maciel JP, Capalozza N, Mosca S, Blaksley EJ, Valverde E, et al. Sex-dependent electrocardiographic pattern of cardiac repolarization. Am Heart J. 2000;140:430–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fleisher LA, Dipietro JA, Johnson TRB, Pincus S. Complementary and non-coincident increases in heart rate variability and irregularity during fetal development. Clin Sci. 1997;92:345–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stramba-Badiale M, Spagnolo D, Bosi G, Schwartz PJ, On behalf of the Misnes Investigators. Are gender differences in QTc present at birth? Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:1277–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Surawicz B, Parikh SR. Prevalence of male and female patterns of early ventricular repolarization in the normal ECG of males and females from childhood to old age. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1870–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rautaharju P, Zhou SH, Wong S, Calhoun HP, Berenson GS, Prineas R, et al. Sex differences in the evolution of the electrocardiographic QT interval with age. Can J Cardiol. 1992;8:690–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang J-H, Lin Y-Q, Pan N-H, Chen Y-J. Aging modulates dispersion of ventricular repolarization in the very old of the geriatric population. Heart Vessels. 2010;25:500–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tran H, White CM, Chow MS, Kluger J. An evaluation of the impact of gender and age on QT dispersion in healthy subjects. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2001;6:129–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramaekers D, Ector H, Aubert AE, Rubens A, Van De Werf F. Heart rate variability and heart rate in healthy volunteers: Is the female autonomic nervous system cardioprotective? Eur Heart J. 1998;19:1334–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stramba-Badiale M, Locati EH, Martinelli A, Courville J, Schwartz PJ. Gender and the relationship between ventricular repolarization and cardiac cycle length during 24-h Holter recordings. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:1000–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Magnano AR, Holleran S, Ramakrishnan R, Reiffel JA, Bloomfield DM. Autonomic nervous system influences on QT interval in normal subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1820–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang Y, Ouyang P, Post WS, Dalal D, Vaidya D, Blasco-Colmenares E, et al. Sex-steroid hormones and electrocardiographic qt-interval duration: findings from the third national health and nutrition examination survey and the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:403–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Charbit B, Christin-Maître S, Démolis JL, Soustre E, Young J, Funck-Brentano C. Effects of testosterone on ventricular repolarization in hypogonadic men. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:887–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bidoggia H, Maciel JP, Capalozza N, Mosca S, Blaksley EJ, Valverde E, et al. Sex differences on the electrocardiographic pattern of cardiac repolarization: possible role of testosterone. Am Heart J. 2000;140:678–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. De Leo V, La Marca A, Agricola E, Morgante G, Mondillo S, Setacci C. Resting ECG is modified after oophorectomy and regresses with estrogen replacement therapy in premenopausal women. Maturitas. 2000;36:43–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Saba S, Link MS, Homoud MK, Wang PJ, Estes NAM. Effect of low estrogen states in healthy women on dispersion of ventricular repolarization. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:354–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Larsen JA, Tung RH, Sadananda R, Goldberger JJ, Horvath G, Parker MA, et al. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on QT interval. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:993–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Altunkeser BB, Ozdemir K, Içli A, Celik C, Akyürek C, Gök H. Effects of long-term hormone replacement therapy on QT and corrected QT dispersion during resting and peak exercise electrocardiography in post-menopausal women. Jpn Heart J. 2002;43:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kadish AH, Greenland P, Limacher MC, Frishman WH, Daugherty SA, Schwartz JB. Estrogen and progestin use and the QT interval in postmenopausal women. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2004;9:366–74.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Seth R, Moss AJ, McNitt S, Zareba W, Andrews ML, Qi M, et al. Long QT syndrome and pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1092–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. McKinley PS, King AR, Shapiro PA, Slavov I, Fang Y, Chen IS, et al. The impact of menstrual cycle phase on cardiac autonomic regulation. Psychophysiology. 2009;46:904–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Endres S, Mayuga KA, De Cristofaro A, Taneja T, Goldberger JJ, Kadish AH. Menstrual cycle and ST height. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2004;9:121–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nakagawa M, Ooie T, Takahashi N, Taniguchi Y, Anan F, Yonemochi H, et al. Influence of menstrual cycle on QT interval dynamics. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29:607–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Khan S, Prakash J, Rashid Ullah Beg M, Kumar M, Hussain G, Dixit R, et al. To study the effect of different phases of menstrual cycle on ECG & blood pressure in healthy young adult females. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2016;4:10406–14.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bers DM. Cardiac excitation-contraction coupling. Nature. 2002;415:198–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Curl CL, Wendt IR, Kotsanas G. Effects of gender on intracellular [Ca2+] in rat cardiac myocytes. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol. 2001;441:709–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Farrell SR, Ross JL, Howlett SE. Sex differences in mechanisms of cardiac excitation-contraction coupling in rat ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;299:H36-45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Grandy SA, Howlett SE. Cardiac excitation-contraction coupling is altered in myocytes from aged male mice but not in cells from aged female mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291:H2362–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Howlett SE. Age-associated changes in excitation-contraction coupling are more prominent in ventricular myocytes from male rats than in myocytes from female rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00214.2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Leblanc N, Chartier D, Gosselin H, Rouleau JL. Age and gender differences in excitation–contraction coupling of the rat ventricle. J Physiol. 1998;511:533–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Parks RJ, Ray G, Bienvenu LA, Rose RA, Howlett SE. Sex differences in SR Ca2+ release in murine ventricular myocytes are regulated by the cAMP/PKA pathway. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;75:162–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Mason SA, MacLeod KT. Cardiac action potential duration and calcium regulation in males and females. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;388:565–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen J, Petranka J, Yamamura K, London RE, Steenbergen C, Murphy E. Gender differences in sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium loading after isoproterenol. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285:H2657–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Chu SH, Sutherland K, Beck J, Kowalski J, Goldspink P, Schwertz D. Sex differences in expression of calcium-handling proteins and beta-adrenergic receptors in rat heart ventricle. Life Sci. 2005;76:2735–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wu Y, Anderson ME. Reduced repolarization reserve in ventricular myocytes from female mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;53:763–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. James AF, Arberry LA, Hancox JC. Gender-related differences in ventricular myocyte repolarization in the guinea pig. Basic Res Cardiol. 2004;99:183–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhu Y, Ai X, Oster RA, Bers DM, Pogwizd SM. Sex differences in repolarization and slow delayed rectifier potassium current and their regulation by sympathetic stimulation in rabbits. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol. 2013;465:805–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Trépanier-Boulay V, St-Michel C, Tremblay A, Fiset C. Gender-based differences in cardiac repolarization in mouse ventricle. Circ Res. 2001;89:437–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Brouillette J, Lupien MA, St-Michel C, Fiset C. Characterization of ventricular repolarization in male and female guinea pigs. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2007;42:357–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Pham TV, Sosunov EA, Gainullin RZ, Danilo P, Rosen MR. Impact of sex and gonadal steroids on prolongation of ventricular repolarization and arrhythmias induced by Ik-blocking drugs. Circulation. 2001;103:2207–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Xiao L, Zhang L, Han W, Wang Z, Nattel S. Sex-based transmural differences in cardiac repolarization and ionic-current properties in canine left ventricles. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291:H570–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Barajas-Martinez H, Haufe V, Chamberland C, Roy MJB, Fecteau MH, Cordeiro JM, et al. Larger dispersion of INa in female dog ventricle as a mechanism for gender-specific incidence of cardiac arrhythmias. Cardiovasc Res. 2009;81:82–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sims C, Reisenweber S, Viswanathan PC, Choi BR, Walker WH, Salama G. Sex, age, and regional differences in L-type calcium current are important determinants of arrhythmia phenotype in rabbit hearts with drug-induced long QT type 2. Circ Res. 2008;102:e86-100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Liu XK, Katchman A, Drici MD, Ebert SN, Ducic I, Morad M, et al. Gender difference in the cycle length-dependent QT and potassium currents in rabbits. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998;285:672–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wei SK, Mccurley JM, Hanlon SU, Haigney MCP. Gender differences in Na/Ca exchanger current and β-adrenergic responsiveness in heart failure in pig myocytes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1387.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Tsai WC, Chen YC, Kao YH, Lu YY, Chen SA, Chen YJ. Distinctive sodium and calcium regulation associated with sex differences in atrial electrophysiology of rabbits. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:4658–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Chen G, Yang X, Alber S, Shusterman V, Salama G. Regional genomic regulation of cardiac sodium-calcium exchanger by oestrogen. J Physiol. 2011;589:1061–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Verkerk AO, Wilders R, Veldkamp MW, de Geringel W, Kirkels JH, Tan HL. Gender disparities in cardiac cellular electrophysiology and arrhythmia susceptibility in human failing ventricular myocytes. Int Heart J. 2005;46:1105–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Gaborit N, Varro A, Le Bouter S, Szuts V, Escande D, Nattel S, et al. Gender-related differences in ion-channel and transporter subunit expression in non-diseased human hearts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010;49:639–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Xiang Y, Kobilka BK. Myocyte adrenoceptor signaling pathways. Science (80-). 2003. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079206.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Vizgirda VM, Wahler GM, Sondgeroth KL, Ziolo MT, Schwertz DW. Mechanisms of sex differences in rat cardiac myocyte response to β-adrenergic stimulation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.2002.282.1.H256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Schwertz DW, Vizgirda V, Solaro RJ, Piano MR, Ryjewski C. Sexual dimorphism in rat left atrial function and response to adrenergic stimulation. Mol Cell Biochem. 1999;200:143–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Hoeker GS, Hood AR, Katra RP, Poelzing S, Pogwizd SM. Sex differences in β-adrenergic responsiveness of action potentials and intracellular calcium handling in isolated rabbit hearts. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e111411.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Mosselman S, Polman J, Dijkema R. ERβ: Identification and characterization of a novel human estrogen receptor. FEBS Lett. 1996;392:49–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Mahmoodzadeh S, Dworatzek E. The role of 17β-estradiol and estrogen receptors in regulation of Ca2+ channels and mitochondrial function in Cardio myocytes. Front Endocrinol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Golden KL, Marsh JD, Jiang Y, Moulden J. Acute actions of testosterone on contractile function of isolated rat ventricular myocytes. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;152:479–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Abi-Gerges N, Philp K, Pollard C, Wakefield I, Hammond TG, Valentin JP, et al. Sex differences in ventricular repolarization: from cardiac electrophysiology to Torsades de Pointes. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004;18:139–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Er F, Michels G, Brandt MC, Khan I, Haase H, Eicks M, et al. Impact of testosterone on cardiac L-type calcium channels and Ca2+ sparks: acute actions antagonize chronic effects. Cell Calcium. 2007;41:467–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Bai CX, Kurokawa J, Tamagawa M, Nakaya H, Furukawa T. Nontranscriptional regulation of cardiac repolarization currents by testosterone. Circulation. 2005;112:1701–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Golden KL, Marsh JD, Jiang Y. Testosterone regulates mRNA levels of calcium regulatory proteins in cardiac myocytes. Horm Metab Res. 2004;36:197–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Nakamura H, Kurokawa J, Bai C-X, Asada K, Xu J, Oren RV, et al. Progesterone regulates cardiac repolarization through a nongenomic pathway. Circulation. 2007;116:2913–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Cheng J, Ma X, Zhang J, Su D. Diverse modulating effects of estradiol and progesterone on the monophasic action potential duration in Langendorff-perfused female rabbit hearts. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2012;26:219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Berger F, Borchard U, Hafner D, Pütz I, Weis TM. Effects of 17β-estradiol on action potentials and ionic currents in male rat ventricular myocytes. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1997;356:788–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ullrich ND, Krust A, Collins P, MacLeod KT. Genomic deletion of estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ does not alter estrogen-mediated inhibition of Ca2+ influx and contraction in murine cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;294:H2421–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Tanabe S, Hata T, Hiraoka M. Effects of estrogen on action potential and membrane currents in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol Circ Physiol. 1999;277:H826–33. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.2.H826.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Jiang C, Poole-Wilson PA, Sarrel PM, Mochizuki S, Collins P, MacLeod KT. Effect of 17β-oestradiol on contraction, Ca2+ current and intracellular free Ca2+ in guinea-pig isolated cardiac myocytes. Br J Pharmacol. 1992;106:739–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Kurokawa J, Tamagawa M, Harada N, Honda SI, Bai CX, Nakaya H, et al. Acute effects of oestrogen on the guinea pig and human IKr channels and drug-induced prolongation of cardiac repolarization. J Physiol. 2008;586:2961–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Saito T, Ciobotaru A, Bopassa JC, Toro L, Stefani E, Eghbali M. Estrogen contributes to gender differences in mouse ventricular repolarization. Circ Res. 2009;105:343–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Drici MD, Burklow TR, Haridasse V, Glazer RI, Woosley RL. Sex hormones prolong the QT interval and downregulate potassium channel expression in the rabbit heart. Circulation. 1996;94:1471–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Yang HY, Firth JM, Francis AJ, Alvarez-Laviada A, MacLeod KT. Effect of ovariectomy on intracellular ca2+ regulation in Guinea pig cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017;313:H1031–43.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Kurokawa J, Kodama M, Clancy CE, Furukawa T. Sex hormonal regulation of cardiac ion channels in drug-induced QT syndromes. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;168:23–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Vicencio JM, Ibarra C, Estrada M, Chiong M, Soto D, Parra V, et al. Testosterone induces an intracellular calcium increase by a nongenomic mechanism in cultured rat cardiac myocytes. Endocrinology. 2006;147:1386–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Curl CL, Delbridge LMD, Canny BJ, Wendt IR. Testosterone modulates cardiomyocyte Ca2+ handling and contractile function. Physiol Res. 2009;58:293–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Golden KL, Marsh JD, Jiang Y. Castration reduces mRNA levels for calcium regulatory proteins in rat heart. Endocrine. 2002;19:339–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Sebag IA, Gillis MA, Calderone A, Kasneci A, Meilleur M, Haddad R, et al. Sex hormone control of left ventricular structure/function: mechanistic insights using echocardiography, expression, and DNA methylation analyses in adult mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;301:H1706–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Tsang S, Wong SSC, Wu S, Kravtsov GM, Wong TM. Testosterone-augmented contractile responses to α1- and β1-adrenoceptor stimulation are associated with increased activities of RyR, SERCA, and NCX in the heart. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2009;296:C766–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Fares E, Parks RJ, MacDonald JK, Egar JMS, Howlett SE. Ovariectomy enhances SR Ca 2+ release and increases Ca 2+ spark amplitudes in isolated ventricular myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;52:32–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Fares E, Pyle WG, Ray G, Rose RA, Denovan-Wright EM, Chen RP, et al. The impact of ovariectomy on calcium homeostasis and myofilament calcium sensitivity in the aging mouse heart. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e74719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Ren J, Hintz KK, Roughead ZKF, Duan J, Colligan PB, Ren BH, et al. Impact of estrogen replacement on ventricular myocyte contractile function and protein kinase B/Akt activation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;284:H1800–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Bupha-Intr T, Wattanapermpool J. Regulatory role of ovarian sex hormones in calcium uptake activity of cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291:H1101–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Turdi S, Huff AF, Pang J, He EY, Chen X, Wang S, et al. 17-β estradiol attenuates ovariectomy-induced changes in cardiomyocyte contractile function via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Toxicol Lett. 2015;232:253–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Nicolson TJ, Mellor HR, Roberts RRA. Gender differences in drug toxicity. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2010;31:108–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Benton RE, Sale M, Flockhart DA, Woosley RL. Greater quinidine-induced QTc interval prolongation in women. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000;67:413–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. El-Eraky H, Thomas SHL. Effects of sex on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of quinidine. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;56:198–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Lehmann MH, Hardy S, Archibald D, Quart B, MacNeil DJ. Sex difference in risk of torsade de pointes with d, l-sotalol. Circulation. 1996;94:2534–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Lehmann MH, Hardy S, Archibald D, MacNeil DJ. JTc prolongation with d, l-sotalol in women versus men. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:354–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Pokorney SD, Yen DC, Campbell KB, Allen LaPointe NM, Sheng S, Thomas L, et al. Dofetilide dose reductions and discontinuations in women compared with men. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:478–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Rathore SS, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Sex-based differences in the effect of digoxin for the treatment of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1403–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Gowda RM, Khan IA, Punukollu G, Vasavada BC, Sacchi TJ, Wilbur SL. Female preponderance in ibutilide-induced torsade de pointes. Int J Cardiol. 2004;95:219–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Rodriguez I, Kilborn MJ, Liu XK, Pezzullo JC, Woosley RL. Drug-induced QT prolongation in women during the menstrual cycle. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;285:1322–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Conrath CE, Wilde AAM, Jongbloed RJE, Alders M, Van Langen IM, Peter Van Tintelen J, et al. Gender differences in the long QT syndrome: effects of β-adrenoceptor blockade. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;53:770–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Wilde AAM, Moss AJ, Kaufman ES, Shimizu W, Peterson DR, Benhorin J, et al. Clinical aspects of type 3 long-QT syndrome: an international multicenter study. Circulation. 2016;134:872–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Benito B, Sarkozy A, Mont L, Henkens S, Berruezo A, Tamborero D, et al. Gender differences in clinical manifestations of Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1567–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Liu XK, Wang W, Ebert SN, Franz MR, Katchman A, Woosley RL. Female gender is a risk factor for torsades de pointes in an in vitro animal model. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999;34:287–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Hara M, Danilo P, Rosen MR. Effects of Gonadal Steroids on ventricular repolarization and on the response to E4031. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998;285:1068–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. van Mil A, Balk GM, Neef K, Buikema JW, Asselbergs FW, Wu SM, et al. Modelling inherited cardiac disease using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: progress, pitfalls, and potential. Cardiovasc Res. 2018;114(14):1828–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvy208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Brandao KO, Tabel VA, Atsma DE, Mummery CL, Davis RP. Human pluripotent stem cell models of cardiac disease: from mechanisms to therapies. Dis Model Mech. 2017;10(9):1039–59. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.030320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Rowe RG, Daley GQ. Induced pluripotent stem cells in disease modelling and drug discovery. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20(7):377–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0100-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Ahmed RE, Anzai T, Chanthra N, Uosaki H. a brief review of current maturation methods for human induced pluripotent stem cells-derived cardiomyocytes. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00178.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Papp R, Bett GCL, Lis A, Rasmusson RL, Baczkó I, Varró A, et al. Genomic upregulation of cardiac Cav1.2α and NCX1 by estrogen in women. Biol Sex Differ. 2017;8:26.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Huo J, Wei F, Cai C, Lyn-Cook B, Pang L. Sex-related differences in drug-induced QT prolongation and Torsades de Pointes: a new model system with human iPSC-CMs. Toxicol Sci. 2019;167:360–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Zeng H, Wang J, Clouse H, Lagrutta A, Sannajust F. HiPSC-CMs from different sex and ethnic origin donors exhibit qualitatively different responses to several classes of pharmacological challenges. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2019;99: 106598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Salem J-E, Yang T, Moslehi JJ, Waintraub X, Gandjbakhch E, Bachelot A, et al. Androgenic effects on ventricular repolarization. Circulation. 2019;140:1070–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the funding agencies for supporting this study.

Funding

Academy of Finland, The Pirkanmaa Hospital District, The Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, The Pirkanmaa Regional Fund of the Finnish Cultural Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33520, Tampere, Finland

    Chandra Prajapati, Jussi Koivumäki, Mari Pekkanen-Mattila & Katriina Aalto-Setälä

  2. Heart Center, Tampere University Hospital, Ensitie 4, 33520, Tampere, Finland

    Katriina Aalto-Setälä

Authors
  1. Chandra Prajapati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jussi Koivumäki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mari Pekkanen-Mattila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katriina Aalto-Setälä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CP wrote and edited the manuscript. JK, MPM, and KAS edited the manuscript. KAS acquired the funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandra Prajapati.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The authors agree with the publication rules and charges.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prajapati, C., Koivumäki, J., Pekkanen-Mattila, M. et al. Sex differences in heart: from basics to clinics. Eur J Med Res 27, 241 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00880-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00880-z

Keywords

  • Sex differences
  • Electrocardiogram
  • Arrhythmias
  • Heart failure
  • Torsades de pointes
  • iPSC modeling
  • Animal experiments

European Journal of Medical Research

ISSN: 2047-783X

Contact us